I hate immigration

[PurgatoryPass]

I agree, always the worse never the best (asian women only)

And latinas/hijabibabys

 

[Blackpill Monk]

I only like good immigrants, bad immigrants who commit crimes should be eutanised

 

[rope infinity ♾️]

And you behaved like every self-righteous SJW ethnicel; keep coping.

Also, the whole reason as to why many of us became SFcels is due to the fact we can see what is going on: Whites are facing possible replacement, and we don't want this to happen. It's as simple as that, and you have even acknowledged the declining birthrates before amongst whites iirc.

I've already debunked this claim, it has nothing to do with great replacement rather it has do with industrialization and modernization of countries

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0COwtusdtC/?igsh=em1zaHBnY3ZxYWxh

Actually, Mesopotamia was older than IVC.

IVC is estimated at about 2600 BCE, whereas Mesopotamia is 4000BCE.

And the legacy left by Greece, Rome, and various other civilizations(including non-White ones) mogs IVC easily.

I know mesopotamia is older, what legacy was left by mesopotamians their legacy was also lost like IVC. Now, you are at legacy, you consider Romans better than Mauryans or the Arab civilizations not because they were superior to these but because of Eurocentrism.

"rabid dogs" jfl: You do realize that a difference exists between waging war in a strategic, co-ordinated, and efficient manner as opposed to some tribes massacring each other?

You know that most historical wars were 90 percent similar to two tribes massacring each other. And the whole startegic co-ordinated wars could only be applied to modern wars, which also costed many innocent lifes, so there is no such thing as startegic co-ordinated civilized war, for those people affected by it. Go ask the innocent Iraqis about the "strategic and civilised" war.

War is part of human nature & can even improve the human condition at times: We simply need to have some organized form of military for public security, providing a more cohesive social structure, and being prepared.

While war may have been a part of human history, it is not an essential or inevitable aspect of human nature. Humans have the capacity for peace and cooperation, as demonstrated by successful peaceful societies such as IVC and modern countries like U.A.E(Dubai), Norway and Finland etc., international treaties, and global organizations working for peace and conflict resolution.
The negative consequences of war often outweigh any potential benefits. The loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, displacement of populations, and long-term psychological trauma experienced by both soldiers and civilians. The positive outcomes of war could be achieved through diplomacy, negotiation, and non-violent means.

I stated the difference between theory v. in practice, as well as explained why I think we have an agenda behind egalitarianism & why it is being pushed.

No one is pushing egalitarianism, ask me I advocate for egalitarianism I have yet to see someone pushing our agenda.

He's not just some random grifter, he's an individual who was an economist & studied various schools of thought, work, etc. Not to mention this was in the past, when education was less "woke"

I literally gave you tons of proof, how he has taken money from billionaires to advocate for their interests. Ah yes "woke" everything that challenges the status quo of the whites and the elites.

Cope. Billionaires fund leftists & at a much larger scale: Antifa has been funded by George Soros in order to destabilize Western countries even more.

Cope. Literally gave you tons of evidence. What you are doing is called coping, saying stuff without evidence. Do you even know what left is some liberals aren't left, actual leftists are socialist and advocate against billionaires and don't take money from them. And ANTIFA is decentralised and cannot take money because it's decentralised. Go read the first few lines.

Antifa (United States) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

He is pushing the counterculture response, as Egalitarianism is the most commonly pushed for ideal from politicians, the media, educational institutions, etc.

You don't push counterculture by taking money from billionaires and the "counterculture" literally benefits the the billionaires, you took money from jfl. Why are you coping so hard? No one is pushing egalitarianism, literally tell me who the fuck is pushing cause I really need to know and support him if he is pushing actual egalitarianism.

Then why do the various institutions they fund promote it?

Which institutions? DON'T say some professors in a university, cause many educated people are egalitarian and socialist. And the people who funds the universities can't tell the universities who to hire.
Name the institutions, professors and who are they being funded by with proof, like I did with your "counter culture" professor.

 

[rope infinity ♾️]

Again, I was stating how Egalitarianism is part of their agenda towards the "you will own nothing & will be happy" since Egalitarianism in principle is a lie & form of "controlled opposition" in order to trick the masses into thinking it is achievable.

You don't even know what egalitarianism is, and you are literally denying the definition of egalitarianism and argue against the definition jfl.

How is it their agenda? Egalitarianism literally campaigns against private institute for the elites, it literally asks for higher tax for the rich. How is egalitarianism advocating from the elites, it's literally against them. Again you literally fail to understand what egalitarianism is.

Such as?

Democracy, Equal opportunity, Empathy and Compassion.

Those terms are very broad & virtually every ideology, religion, and movement espouses them, yet they all have differing methods & ways of interpreting them.

No, if you read what I said you'll know those people clearly advocated for egalitarianism.

No wonder it collapsed then.

It's mature phase lasted longer than mature phase of greek and Roman empire

It goes against laws of nature & thus everyone.

You know that civilization, you eating cooked food goes against laws of nature. We've left nature and it's laws behind the day we created civilization. And existence of Bonobos proofs that it doesn't entirely goes against laws of nature.

Good, democracy has failed & is partially why we are in the current state of things.

Failed your SF idiology, if it failed you doesn't mean it failed everyone.

It resisted it simply because it new that the new order of democracy would wish to do away with the Church, that's why. They wished to preserve what they had.

Which proves my point that it never acted as a counter weight, and aided the oppressiveness.

Commoners do deserve to be well cared-for, but many of them simply will not have the qualities, achievements, etc needed to be governors, generals, scientists, etc.

You are coping. And saying stuff without presenting anecdotal evidence. Many scientists were children of your average Joe.

Example?

Better planned cities.
Easy access to clean water.
Not getting forced to join military and fight wars for some retard who would be remembered not you.
Abundance of food, because of highly fertile plain.

You do realize maybe it's due to the fact that their location prevented that? Maybe not so much the fact that they had people around them who were warlike.

Which war waging civilizations were around Greeks and Romans rather greek and Romans attacked others like rabid dogs.

It is, because you used it in a way to attack me & discredit my argument. And he is a much better user than you are tbh.

Much better because he is a jester for SFcels like you and worship whites and I am a bad user because I debunk your SFcel copes by actual evidence.

Duh: It also mogged in seafaring which I personally believe serves as a good reflection of a peoples advancement.

IVC trade with mesopotamians via sea, and they were good sea farers too. This is also another evidence for their advancements.


Do you even read my responses? You don't even know what egalitarianism and you are mixing it with authoritarianism which you are a advocate for.