P
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hlx6y8/please_find_something_to_demonstrate_that_this_is/
Please find something to demonstrate that this is wrong part 2 becaus…
archived 6 Jul 2020 00:17:19 UTC
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hlx6y8/please_find_something_to_demonstrate_that_this_is/
Ban science it hurts their feelings.
P
@Edmund_Kemper @Mainländer @Robtical @Irishcel @Caesercel
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hlx66a/i_am_getting_sent_this_part_1_please_find/
archive.is
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hlx66a/i_am_getting_sent_this_part_1_please_find/
I am getting sent this part 1. Please find something wrong with this …
archived 6 Jul 2020 00:21:57 UTC
Attachments
Last edited:
This but replacing the race stuff for young females stuff.
Truth hurts u IT fuckers
Holy shit the memes write themselves 
E
They’re probably gonna use arguments like:
*muh sample size. Sure, the sample size is only 48, but that’s no big deal because human sexuality doesn’t vary by country, region, age group, race, etc. there’s NO evidence that the prevalence of homosexuality varies by age group, region, race, etc. and chronophilia (sexual attraction to a particular age group) is as innate as sexual orientation toward a particular gender. For example, studies have shown that pedophiles (people who are attracted predominantly to prepubescent children. Not all child molesters are pedophiles) have brains very different from that of non-pedophiles and are more likely to be below average height and more likely to be left-handed (homosexuals also are more likely to be left-handed). Hebephiles are also more likely to be left handed. There’s lots of evidence that chronophilia and sexual orientation toward a particular gender is all innate.
Chronophilia and sexual orientation doesn’t vary by age group, region, race, etc. unlike public opinion on gun control or abortion or whatever, which explains why large sample sizes are more important with political views but not with prevalence ofcertain sexual orientations or chronophilias. Therefore, if a majority of the men showed sexual arousal to adolescent girls ages 12-16, then that just shows you that it’s common among men. I found other studies showing that it’s common.
they also will try saying that penile phallometry isn’t reliable because it received criticism before. Well this isn’t exactly true. Many sexologists and researchers continue to use it because they decided its still adequate and asking people about their sexuality is difficult because many people won’t be honest due to extreme stigma. And if phallometry isn’t reliable at all, why did the men show only little arousal to prepubescent girls and little to no arousal to men of all age groups? Kinda tells you something.
*muh sample size. Sure, the sample size is only 48, but that’s no big deal because human sexuality doesn’t vary by country, region, age group, race, etc. there’s NO evidence that the prevalence of homosexuality varies by age group, region, race, etc. and chronophilia (sexual attraction to a particular age group) is as innate as sexual orientation toward a particular gender. For example, studies have shown that pedophiles (people who are attracted predominantly to prepubescent children. Not all child molesters are pedophiles) have brains very different from that of non-pedophiles and are more likely to be below average height and more likely to be left-handed (homosexuals also are more likely to be left-handed). Hebephiles are also more likely to be left handed. There’s lots of evidence that chronophilia and sexual orientation toward a particular gender is all innate.
Chronophilia and sexual orientation doesn’t vary by age group, region, race, etc. unlike public opinion on gun control or abortion or whatever, which explains why large sample sizes are more important with political views but not with prevalence ofcertain sexual orientations or chronophilias. Therefore, if a majority of the men showed sexual arousal to adolescent girls ages 12-16, then that just shows you that it’s common among men. I found other studies showing that it’s common.
they also will try saying that penile phallometry isn’t reliable because it received criticism before. Well this isn’t exactly true. Many sexologists and researchers continue to use it because they decided its still adequate and asking people about their sexuality is difficult because many people won’t be honest due to extreme stigma. And if phallometry isn’t reliable at all, why did the men show only little arousal to prepubescent girls and little to no arousal to men of all age groups? Kinda tells you something.
I can’t read the arguments IT make because it’ll be too much ragefuel can you describe what they say WITHOUT quoting them?
Last edited:
There are some comments there basically saying that as soon as you notice a girl you found attractive is a high school girl or something, you must immediately stop looking and try to convince yourself that you don't really want to have sex with her.
they are coping subhumans like @Caesercel
E
Did you read both threads?
Also, finding out they’re underage doesn’t magically get rid of your attraction. It’s not some button you turn on or off. Homosexuals can’t turn into straight people so how can you get rid your attraction to them just because you discovered they’re underage? Sexuality doesn’t work that way
P
@werty1457 argues otherwise. fucking moron
You have to be very low t or gay not to find nude teens attractive.
E
Is he a moralfag?
P
he is moralfag like the other big three @PPEcel @Caesercel @FrothySolutions
Yeah, there is one of them contesting the study. These ones I mentioned are basically advocating that you must condition yourself against the attraction if you find out that the girl is under whatever age they think is the minimum one.
There's also @Irishcel . Shit, I leave the forum for a couple of months and you people let it happen? It was nothing like that in late 2019 when I was still active, kek.
Last edited:
Turn on subs in english
The same argument is made on a flat earth forum as on IT "can someone disprove his argument? i know that he's wrong"
IncelTears is literally as dumb as Flat Earthers
Also femoids grow up faster wich makes them look older at a younger age that's why men showed arrousal by young foids (i found a photo that a classmate sent me when i was 12 it shows a foid on a motorbike from my previous class and i kid you not she looks like she is in her early 20's at 13 y/o)
Last edited:
What is this? Can't see the graph on phone
D
When faced with facts, IT can’t refute them.
E
What did they say when contesting the study (don’t quote just describe)?
Wow you have obviously done your research on counter arguing anti - pedo stances haven't you.
Sound like a veteran. But we are all just reasonable men here having logical discussion amiright? No pedos here FBI.
They're saying the methodology must be wrong because there's no way those results can be true.
@Edmund_Kemper deserves a honoris causa degree in that subject. That doesn't imply he's a pedo, he's just an intelligent autist who has intense specific interests.Wow you have obviously done your research on counter arguing anti - pedo stances haven't you.
Last edited:
@Edmund_Kemper @Mainländer @Robtical @Irishcel @Caesercel
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hlx66a/i_am_getting_sent_this_part_1_please_find/
I am getting sent this part 1. Please find something wrong with this …
archived 6 Jul 2020 00:21:57 UTC
I agree. Regular men can easily have sexual attraction towards pre puberty girls. Its not rocket science.
Wow you have obviously done your research on counter arguing anti - pedo stances haven't you.
E
First of all, can you stop rubbing your clit?Wow you have obviously done your research on counter arguing anti - pedo stances haven't you.
Any ways, explain how my arGument didn’t work. Chronophilia and sexual orientation doesn’t vary by age group, region, race etc
Of course. I never said he is one. He just has a very nice and niche specific (((interest)))
I think it's very understandable to develop and interest in that subject after you learn how gynocentric society is and how the mainstream lies to us about what's normal male sexuality and what isn't.
E
Just because the results are hard for them to believe doesn’t mean it’s false. Many information will be hard to believe in life
And also, when I was got older I got worried about how I was still attracted to teens but my therapist told me it’s normal. And I also got interested in the NOMAPs too
They don't want to accept it because it demolishes the worldview they hold, which is not based on actual biology, actual science, actual morals or anything of the kind. Feminism is just a dumb ideology.
E
The only “proof” they have that finding a 17 year old even remotely attractive is rare is society saying it’s rare. But society always tells us myths
I accidentaly clicked on the profile of the guy who made that thread on IT, look at the type of community he belongs to:
www.reddit.com
Jesus, the absolute state of people.
r/AreTheStraightsOK
r/AreTheStraightsOK: Is someone holding these poor souls hostage and forcing them to be together?
www.reddit.com
Jesus, the absolute state of people.
JFL @ them referring to a 15 year old as a child.
But only on their side. The 15 year old that joked about rape should be tried as an adult and sent to a russian gulag.
But only on their side. The 15 year old that joked about rape should be tried as an adult and sent to a russian gulag.
Serious Question. What do you think the foid AOC should be. For all things, marriage, sex, relationship, making pornography etc.
E
Foids look better at 16-18 than they do at 30
The irony is that there is a debate among scientists about races because of things like fst values, so idk how scientific that statement is. If someone wanted to get their point across, they should mention something non-pc but less contentious
For marriage, sex and relationships (which in an ideal society would all be one thing), puberty. Pornography ideally shouldn't exist, but like I said in recent threads, outlawing just pornography without outlawing other stuff like no-fault divorce, female sexual licentiousness, etc, would be cucked.
If you were to put a number on puberty, for legal purposes, what would it be?
Putting numbers will always be arbitrary in that context. But I'll play your game: 13. The most accepted definition of a child is 0-12, so 13 seems to be the most reasonable number I could give you. Plus, at 13, pretty much all girls are at least in the middle of puberty.
Last edited:
E
Nearly all foids have hit puberty by age 12
I know, but I was being a bit conservative. To avoid "look at this particular 12 yo who's still a perfect child!" kind of responses.
E
How old does polly klaas look to you?
I translated her posts:
“Nothing in the world has changed but because I read a study that shows men are attracted to females I am now afraid to go outside”
In which particular pic? Google says she was 12 when she died, but some pics must be from when she was younger.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
