I know porn is not "real life", but I see these guys with verified 8" dicks and how easily women take all 8" of them... then I look down at mine and I think "wtf".
And fuck these studies that claim 5-6" are average too, because in theory that might be the case, but in practice, it is not. What I mean by that is that is, in practice, <5" dicks are easily out of the pool of people having sex. Guys under 5" have either felt the sting of rejection for their size, or intuitively know they're too small, so they're out. So from a women's perspective, 5" is easily considered small. Once that's established, we can finally start to determine the actual average. Now I know dick size is a bell curve distribution but I think when you consider the fact that guys with bigger dicks are having more sex with more women, the distribution appears to be more evenly distributed to the general population of women. So from that assumption, it becomes simple math... assuming a range of 5" to 8.5", you come to an average of 6.75".
Now, admittedly, this is where I start reaching (maybe). When have women ever been satisfied with average? Think about height. Women generally do not like settling for average, they will, but that doesn't mean they're happy about it. 5'9" is average male height in the US, but women only start swooning for guys above 6' or 6'1". That means you have to be about 5% over the average in height to have women wet for you. Now apply that 5% increase to the 6.75" and it means your dick has to be about 7.08" long to have women genuinely wanting/impressed by your dick. So what does that mean for guys? Women only start swooning for guys not at 6.75" but at 7.08", and the 5.5" dick is obviously out of the question at that point too. And don't pretend like a mere 1.5" difference is nothing, because that discrepancy is huge.
I know I'm reaching with some of this shit... but I'm convinced that my logic checks out, even if my numbers might not, but I bet my figures are close.
And fuck these studies that claim 5-6" are average too, because in theory that might be the case, but in practice, it is not. What I mean by that is that is, in practice, <5" dicks are easily out of the pool of people having sex. Guys under 5" have either felt the sting of rejection for their size, or intuitively know they're too small, so they're out. So from a women's perspective, 5" is easily considered small. Once that's established, we can finally start to determine the actual average. Now I know dick size is a bell curve distribution but I think when you consider the fact that guys with bigger dicks are having more sex with more women, the distribution appears to be more evenly distributed to the general population of women. So from that assumption, it becomes simple math... assuming a range of 5" to 8.5", you come to an average of 6.75".
Now, admittedly, this is where I start reaching (maybe). When have women ever been satisfied with average? Think about height. Women generally do not like settling for average, they will, but that doesn't mean they're happy about it. 5'9" is average male height in the US, but women only start swooning for guys above 6' or 6'1". That means you have to be about 5% over the average in height to have women wet for you. Now apply that 5% increase to the 6.75" and it means your dick has to be about 7.08" long to have women genuinely wanting/impressed by your dick. So what does that mean for guys? Women only start swooning for guys not at 6.75" but at 7.08", and the 5.5" dick is obviously out of the question at that point too. And don't pretend like a mere 1.5" difference is nothing, because that discrepancy is huge.
I know I'm reaching with some of this shit... but I'm convinced that my logic checks out, even if my numbers might not, but I bet my figures are close.
