Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal I asked Christian forums where and how to look for a wife

andrej

andrej

I hate simps
★★★★
Joined
Oct 27, 2025
Posts
3,875
Online time
2d 2h
The answers were:
"You're just 19, you have plenty of time live your life."
"Just socialize in your church and tell people that you're single"
"Go to Bible study groups"
"Find some new hobbies where you can meet new people"
"Ask your friends to set you up with someone"

Unironically, the best answer I got was actually this:
"Maybe dating isn't for you and God is calling you for priesthood"

The other answers were other Christians who also at ages of like 30 can't find a partner

Just be NT and good looking theory
Just have friends theory

It really is over
 
No Christianity for your face.
 
If god (lowercase g) was real we would all have a wife
 
:soy: "if yh wanted you to have a wife He'd give you one!"
Isn't it convenient that yh wants every wife beating chad to have a wife and but wants every sensitive incel to die alone
 
As usual Cuckstians have ALL the answers, just no good ones! :feelskek:
 
If god (lowercase g) was real we would all have a wife
:soy: "if yh wanted you to have a wife He'd give you one!"
Isn't it convenient that yh wants every wife beating chad to have a wife and but wants every sensitive incel to die alone
Chad gets a whore who only likes him for his looks so since she has no humanity in her and he ignores her obvious sins they both burn in hell
 
As usual Cuckstians have ALL the answers, just no good ones! :feelskek:
It's obvious that the Church is suffering an attack from the satan controlling world. Traditional Christianity would not condemn foids having preferences in looks. The Bibles teaches that everyone is equal regardless of they look. Maybe there were foids 2000 years ago who weren't like this but unfortunately in modern times foids are all like this
 
It's obvious that the Church is suffering an attack from the satan controlling world. Traditional Christianity would not condemn foids having preferences in looks. The Bibles teaches that everyone is equal regardless of they look. Maybe there were foids 2000 years ago who weren't like this but unfortunately in modern times foids are all like this
No women were always like they are now.

Its just that now allows them to be what they are.

They simply conform to whatever the culture allows and promotes.

Their nature is to get societal approval and the pat on the head.

If they can only achieve that by being tradthots they'll be tradthots.

If they can only acheive that by being BBC nigger loving dick sucking whores they'll do that.

They are amoral by nature and heavily pragmatic and hypergamous.

They are not romantic naive fools by default like we men are.

Christianity won't tell you anything but lies and misdirections about their nature and pretty much everything else.
 
Proof buddy?
Also where is the Father and Holy Spirit
Proof is in the documented evidence for resurrection as well as numerous miracles in the Church
The Father, the HS and the Son are all one God who is everywhere (omnipresent) if by where you mean the position in time and space
 
Proof is in the documented evidence for resurrection as well as numerous miracles in the Church
Give me a miracle
The Father, the HS and the Son are all one God who is everywhere (omnipresent) if by where you mean the position in time and space
What?!
 
i think they're worldview is outdated and not intuned for people like us, its like asking chad how to get girls, pointless. I know this is the most obvious shit ever but I still wanted to write something in this post
 
3 persons one God
That mean that father, son, holy spirit aren't gods but persons that combine to make one god
The persons are co-eternal and co-equal all alike are uncreated and omnipotent.
Okay why they are three persons, why not 1 or 2 or even 4?
 
Christcuckery is one of the worst copes. Not only can the religion be oneshot with like 2-3 problems in scriptures, it so obviously does nothing. Like just rub your braincels together for a bit, would christians really lead the lives they do if they were favored by an omnipotent being?
 
That mean that father, son, holy spirit aren't gods but persons that combine to make one god
Yes the persons aren't multiple gods they are one God but I'm not sure what you mean by combine
Okay why they are three persons, why not 1 or 2 or even 4?
Because the Church teaches us that through Biblical evidence God is trinitarian. If Christian God is real it's impossible for there to be less or more persons than three. If Islamic God is real it's impossible for there to be more persons than one.
 
Christcuckery is one of the worst copes. Not only can the religion be oneshot with like 2-3 problems in scriptures, it so obviously does nothing. Like just rub your braincels together for a bit, would christians really lead the lives they do if they were favored by an omnipotent being?
Because 2000 years of churches theology and textual criticism was oneshot with 2-3 problems. Are we deadass?
 
Yes the persons aren't multiple gods they are one God but I'm not sure what you mean by combine

Because the Church teaches us that through Biblical evidence God is trinitarian. If Christian God is real it's impossible for there to be less or more persons than three. If Islamic God is real it's impossible for there to be more persons than one.
Trinitarianism is a later theological development because christcucks didn't know what to do with Jesus as a being (gospel of Mark Jesus so obviously reads like a charismatic preacher and healer, of which we have boatloads from that area and time). And a completel misread of Holy Spirit from Judaism. Early Jewish Christians didn't believe in trinitarianism, and it's so completely illogical it destroys the religion on its own. You likely don't believe the church doctrine yourself, or commit modalism/partialism on accident. It's such mental gymnastics it still hasn't landed.
 
Yes the persons aren't multiple gods they are one God but I'm not sure what you mean by combine
So that means that jesus is not a god but he is a person with 2 other persons that make one god
Because the Church teaches us that through Biblical evidence God is trinitarian. If Christian God is real it's impossible for there to be less or more persons than three
That is not a proof, you say "Biblical evidence", but I am talking logically
If Islamic God is real it's impossible for there to be more persons than one.
Yes, Allah is islam is one and the only God
 
Because 2000 years of churches theology and textual criticism was oneshot with 2-3 problems. Are we deadass?
Yes, we are deadass, and these problems are known for 2000 years. The authors of gospels didn't even know Torah, they were complete hacks.
Here's some fun facts for you.
- st. Paul didn't even know Hebrew. He makes an argument from grammar in Galatians 3:16 that betrays the fact that he's reading the Septuagint (greek translation from Ptolemaic Egypt).
- authors of gospels didn't know Hebrew either, noticable when they quote Torah
- Jesus didn't even believe in same metaphysics you do. He believed in bodily resurrection, like 1st century jews did. Or Jehova witnesses today. It's why he (supposedly) resurrects in the gospels. Because his contemporaries thought that was the thing to do. Heaven, Aristotelian God with Platonic properties, is smuggling in greek metaphysics. Bronze age jews didn't even believe in a soul (another platonic concept) it's why god breathes life into Adam. Jews thought breath is your "soul"
- Paul contradicts Jesus. Jesus never says to not obey old laws like Paul does. I'll remind you that Paul just had a heat induced hallucination of Jesus in a desert and then went around claiming bunch of bullshit contradicting hebrew bible (remember, same guy that claims to be divinely inspired but also gets the scriptures wrong)
- Genesis itself has 2 creation accounts, one of them is Yahwist (Yahweh used to be a god of war in Judean polytheism btw). You can notice the two origin points by the fact that Genesis 1 calls god God and Genesis 2 calls god Lord God
- old judaism has a bunch of zoroastrian imports and later persian influences, as an example the burning bush and moses removing his shoes is direct imagery from eternal fire and zorastrian priests removing their shoes in shrines

This is pure internal critique. There's whole bunch of other stuff that I forget, but Christianity is literally fanfiction of an old fanfiction combining myths from all over the place
 
Trinitarianism is a later theological development because christcucks didn't know what to do with Jesus as a being (gospel of Mark Jesus so obviously reads like a charismatic preacher and healer, of which we have boatloads from that area and time). And a completel misread of Holy Spirit from Judaism. Early Jewish Christians didn't believe in trinitarianism, and it's so completely illogical it destroys the religion on its own. You likely don't believe the church doctrine yourself, or commit modalism/partialism on accident. It's such mental gymnastics it still hasn't landed.
Trinitarianism is evident through both the Old and New Testament. In the Old Testament, “LORD” is distinguished from “Lord” (Genesis 19:24; Hosea 1:4). The LORD has a Son (Psalm 2:7-12; Proverbs 30:2-4). The Spirit is distinguished from the “LORD” (Numbers 27:18) and from “God” (Psalm 51:10-12). God the Son is distinguished from God the Father (Psalm 45:6-7; Hebrews 1:8-9). In the New Testament, Jesus speaks to the Father about sending a Helper, the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17). This shows that Jesus did not consider Himself to be the Father or the Holy Spirit. Consider also the other instances when Jesus speaks to the Father. Was He speaking to Himself? No. He spoke to another Person in the Trinity which is the Father. In several places, the Old Testament records encounters with someone called “the Angel of the Lord.” This supernatural presence speaks as if He is God, identifies Himself with God, and exercises the responsibilities of God. For example, in Genesis 16:10, the Angel of the Lord says to Hagar, “I will increase your descendants so much that they will be too numerous to count.” Of course, God is the One who blesses Ishmael, but it’s the Angel of the Lord who personally makes the promise to his mother. The same Angel of the Lord appears to Abraham and assumes the role of God, saying, “Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son” (Genesis 22:12, emphasis added ). See also Exodus 3:2; Judges 2:1–4; 5:23; 6:11–24; 13:3–22; 2 Samuel 24:16; Zechariah 1:12; 3:1; 12:8. In several passages, those who see the Angel of the Lord fear for their lives because they had “seen the Lord.” It’s clear that the Angel of the Lord was no mere angel. Viewed through the lens of the New Testament teaching of the Trinity, it’s easy to conclude that the Angel of the Lord references a pre-incarnate appearance of the Son.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B0ROQF6hq4
 
Trinitarianism is evident through both the Old and New Testament. In the Old Testament, “LORD” is distinguished from “Lord” (Genesis 19:24; Hosea 1:4). The LORD has a Son (Psalm 2:7-12; Proverbs 30:2-4). The Spirit is distinguished from the “LORD” (Numbers 27:18) and from “God” (Psalm 51:10-12). God the Son is distinguished from God the Father (Psalm 45:6-7; Hebrews 1:8-9). In the New Testament, Jesus speaks to the Father about sending a Helper, the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17). This shows that Jesus did not consider Himself to be the Father or the Holy Spirit. Consider also the other instances when Jesus speaks to the Father. Was He speaking to Himself? No. He spoke to another Person in the Trinity which is the Father. In several places, the Old Testament records encounters with someone called “the Angel of the Lord.” This supernatural presence speaks as if He is God, identifies Himself with God, and exercises the responsibilities of God. For example, in Genesis 16:10, the Angel of the Lord says to Hagar, “I will increase your descendants so much that they will be too numerous to count.” Of course, God is the One who blesses Ishmael, but it’s the Angel of the Lord who personally makes the promise to his mother. The same Angel of the Lord appears to Abraham and assumes the role of God, saying, “Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son” (Genesis 22:12, emphasis added ). See also Exodus 3:2; Judges 2:1–4; 5:23; 6:11–24; 13:3–22; 2 Samuel 24:16; Zechariah 1:12; 3:1; 12:8. In several passages, those who see the Angel of the Lord fear for their lives because they had “seen the Lord.” It’s clear that the Angel of the Lord was no mere angel. Viewed through the lens of the New Testament teaching of the Trinity, it’s easy to conclude that the Angel of the Lord references a pre-incarnate appearance of the Son.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B0ROQF6hq4

If it's evident from Old Testament why don't jews believe it? Why did they go about a thousand years not believing it. I

That Gensis quote is famous, it's redactional layering, I forget what it was exactly, but it's evidence of overwriting of source material by later groups. It's not trini-retadianism
Psalm 2 is obviously talking about the ruler, christards cannot stop taking shit out of context.
Proverbs 30 says nothing about a son. Holy spirit is a concept in Judaism, it's not what christards pretend it is. There's talmudic verses where Holy Spirit and God talks back and forth, it's a literary vehicle. It's why jews think you're dumb goyim. You don't understand their scripture and read stupid shit into it.

I am not arguing with chat gpt. Keep coping.

Go ahead and explain to us the hypostatic union and how Jesus is 100% man and 100% God violating basic laws of logic. Remember it's not 50 50, that's partialism.
 
Jesus is God and a person of the Trinity.
Here we go again
Jesus is god, Father is god, Holy Spirit is god and at the same time they are 3 persons who form one god, jfl :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
The burden is on you to prove that Trinitarianism is illogical
Okay
First, Logically why they are 3, why not 2, why not 4, why not 1? What is the advantage of 3 ?

Second, How can 3 control the universe and the whole life? I mean in Islam, there is one God who is Allah. He is one and only who control the life, but in your religion they are 3, that make a huge possibility of disagreements between them

Third, If the trinity is true, how can 3 complete gods form one true god and who is that true god?

Also why you mention jesus in your daily life, why don't you mention The Father or The Holy Spirit?
Maybe Allah is calling for your martyrdom.
You better answer 🙃
 
What do you believe in idiot?
I'm an atheist. It's the blackpill of religion. There's nothing. You will die and that's it. Stop coping and wasting time reading pedo fanfics and doing dumb rituals
 
I'm an atheist
Ohhhh cool, I have some questions for you nigga

1- How did life begin?
2- What is the purpose of life?
3- What is after death?
4- If there is nothing, what is the proof and why are you alive?, I mean why you cope and don't rope if there is nothing (I don't encourage suicide but I am asking why you cope and be a cuck who watch sexhavers everywhere and don't rope?)
5- What is morals? I mean, what is your moral compass? You say "pedo" "dumb", How can you decide that something is wrong or true or dumb?
 
Ohhhh cool, I have some questions for you nigga

1- How did life begin?
With a self replicating molecule. Emergent complex behaviour from simple operations is a very common thing. Game of Life is touring complete. Your computer hardware runs on one boolean function.
2- What is the purpose of life?
Anthropocentric question. Purpose is a human concept. You're just trying to pilot your molecule to the next generation. There's genes that cause some small critters to alert the group to a predator, killing the individual in process. Most salient example of the genes surviving and not the individual.
3- What is after death?
Same thing there was before birth. Consciousness is a function of brain. If you got impaled through your skull and survived you'd have degraded functions/personality changes.

4- If there is nothing, what is the proof and why are you alive?
The proof is that during 0 brain activity you form no memories. All visions during brief periods of "death" occur when there's brain activity.

I mean why you cope and don't rope if there is nothing
same reason you play videogames you know will end

5- What is morals? I mean, what is your moral compass? You say "pedo" "dumb", How can you decide that something is wrong or true or dumb?
Morals is a large group consensus of acceptable behaviour. It's a necessary mechanism of social species. Chimps have morals, whales have morals. It's not some voodoo beamed into your brain. There's tribes in africa that consider eating their relatives after they die a moral virtue. Anything not completely destructive to the group has a chance of persisting. Even ridiculous things like mesoamerican child sacrifices (by the way, also religiously moral, same paradigm you believe in).
How can you decide that something is wrong or true or dumb?

Strictly speaking, it's my opinion. Truth is a property of statements we make. Truth doesn't float in the universe anywhere. Closest thing to "truth" is comparing my mental model with what I am perceiving. But you have a different mental model of a "chair" than I do. Despite that we can communicate
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • sulpuda
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →