Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL I asked both Grok and ChatGPT if men that think of themselves as "sub-5s" and "sub-human" are objectively ugly based of studies and face reveals

andinocel

andinocel

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Posts
5,509
They both used different wording, but the answers were in the lines of 'men who think of themselves as 1 or 2 out of 10 and describe themselves as sub-human are usually average to below average appearance, around 3 to 5'................SO BASICALLY FUCKING YES, we are accurate. 3 to 5 out of 10 is still fucking ugly and does not cut it to register in foids' radar.

They both think that dating/courtship is like it was 40-50 year ago...an average looking or even slightly below guy, could find a cute mid to settle. But being a 4 to 5 now is akin to being a 1 or 2, or deformed, several decades ago
 
They both think that dating/courtship is like it was 40-50 year ago...an average looking or even slightly below guy, could find a cute mid to settle.
Why create an AI if they limit it so that it doesn't learn shit?

Those fucking lying scumbags.



Why don't you throw ChatGPT and all the others out? So far it just sounds like talking to an average normie.
 
So far it just sounds like talking to an average normie.
more like the average redditor. "mmm actsuallly this view isn't supported by mainstream discourse "
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top