Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory "Humans have 20x more female ancestors than male ancestors"

I

IsaaqYare

.
-
Joined
May 18, 2023
Posts
206
Which implies that the common mating strategy amongst humans for most of history is polygamy, ie chad and his harem. I'm seeing more and more feminists and cucked men saying this shit as a justification for the increasing numbers of incels and lonely men. They think that monogamy is a artificial construct that was created 10,000 years ago, which is roughly 10% of man's existence, by men to enslave and evenly distribute women to men. Now that women have been "liberated" and monogamy is on it's way out (almost every marriage is dead bedroom or cucked), we are simply dealing with an excess of non-chad males that need to die off after slaving away for the state without ever having a partner or children. This is the reasoning behind that argument.

Honestly, this argument has some merit and idk how to counter it. Some quick research proves that the statement is true, we do have more female ancestors than male ancestors.

What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
the argument is blackpilled, there is nothing to counter that, except stating that more-and-more non-chads start to drop out of society and rot, which will inevitably lead to societal collapse.

Can you name any successful non-monogamous society btw?
 
the argument is blackpilled, there is nothing to counter that, except stating that more-and-more non-chads start to drop out of society and rot, which will inevitably lead to societal collapse.

Can you name any successful non-monogamous society btw?
That's what I was thinking as well. It's actually quite interesting how humans literally did nothing of note for 190,000 years until some guy decided to invent monogamy 10,000 years ago. Only then did everything that constitutes a culture and early cvilization begin to flourish. One could argue that the same monogamy these feminists and cucks demonize lead to everything humanity has ever developed culturally and technologically.
 
Last edited:
Yes that's correct. I read somewhere that average harem in neolit consists 18 females. That created 18 incels for one Chad! Thanks to feminism that times are coming back. Time of harems.
 
That's what I was thinking as well. It's actually quite interesting how humans literally did nothing of note for 190000 years until some guy decided to invent monogamy 10000 years ago. Only then did everything that constitutes a culture and early cvilization begin to flourish. One could argue that the same monogamy these feminists and cucks demonize lead to everything humanity has ever developed culturally and technologically.
Inventing monogamy was first sexsual communist revolution in history - distributing females equally (of course it was never perfect) since than till neoliberal sexsual revolution of 1960s
 
Inventing monogamy was first sexsual communist revolution in history - distributing females equally (of course it was never perfect) since than till neoliberal sexsual revolution of 1960s
It's the reason why everything you associate with humanity exists. Without monogamy, we would still be doing what humans did for 190,000 years: nothing. Communism is freeloaders stealing from the productive ones in society. Monogamy is the only way to develop past tiny hunter gatherer tribes. They're not the same.
 
Last edited:
Damn, i just realized that this where a foid's hypergamy originates from. They exclusively bred with chad for most of history. It's literally encoded into their DNA. Just when you thought the blackpill couldn't get any worse....
 
The reason most men back then didn't reproduce wasn't because they were too ugly for foids, it was that they died before they got the chance to fuck.
 
I hope the younger coming generations suffer far more greatly then any of us
 
if that's already hard to grasp then try drinking this in:

Roughly 80% of all foids that existed in this world reproduced (making us their descendants)
 
so it means that we're all the sons of chad but we're still ugly looking

the next generations will probably have 1 or 2 fathers
 
If you are capable of engaging in monogamy, that means your brain is less primitive and more evolved. This is something that the eugenicist feminist soy cucks and foids cannot accept, they are the ones who are more like monkeys, because promiscuity is pure animal behavior without any reason.
 
the argument is blackpilled, there is nothing to counter that, except stating that more-and-more non-chads start to drop out of society and rot, which will inevitably lead to societal collapse.

Can you name any successful non-monogamous society btw?
This. Yes it's always been nature for chad to have harems but it's also been nature for chad to have to fight to keep it. This current system where chad had harems and incels are paying taxes for his dozen kids is unnatural.
 
The reason most men back then didn't reproduce wasn't because they were too ugly for foids, it was that they died before they got the chance to fuck.
Yes selection criteria was different. Height still mattered but stuff like chin or carthanal tilt gave way to psychopathy and dark triad traits which were most important to survive.
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
4
Views
628
Cryo
Cryo
WastedPotential
Replies
70
Views
1K
Grodd
Grodd
RealSchizo
Replies
16
Views
2K
societysucks
societysucks
AdExpress
Replies
8
Views
857
FuckYou
FuckYou
ravisk
Replies
6
Views
453
nihilum
nihilum

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top