E
What is the origin of the evils existing in ordinary life? corruption? domination? emotions? Intellectualism in the last 500 years has produced the most varied interpretations of what would be the origin of all evils. Pekka Eric-Auvinen however, with his Extreme Misanthropy, has given us a potential answer: Humanity is the origin of evils. this answer, of course, was not only given by Pekka/Wokka, but also by many other people, who have reached the same conclusion throughout history, such as Pentti Linkola, who wrote in all his intellectual work, how humanity is the only cause of all major problems for himself and other living beings. Humanity being the origin of evils may seem like something really out of the question, especially at first sight, but in order to analyze the answer, a precise observation of reality and a mentality ready to accept the results is necessary. Throughout all of human history, we have seen all the possible manifestations that human beings can carry out, both in the most peaceful and in the most brutal and violent ways. We have seen the rise of empires born of bravery and along with it, their downfall. we have seen the rise of prejudice and its subsequent liberation. we have seen peace dominated by war, only to be regained afterwards. It is very important to understand that human and natural evils do represent a non-constructive part of the universe that is a threat to everything that exists. every corruption, pollution, war, domination, achievement, thought or deed has a cause, an origin. therefore action itself is not an essence but an effect, a manifestation of a force or agent which is the very origin of what exists. denying, therefore, that humanity is indeed the origin of all evils is to deny the very objective existence of life in today's world. all pacifist reform movements are also based, therefore, on a mistaken basis on the functioning of man, appealing to victimhood and not reality as the basis of their principles, making everyone dysfunctional in a perpetual way. if there's one thing humanity has, it's persistence in its troubled nature. people never change in essence. they can obviously adapt to the occasion, but whenever they have power, they will manifest the very thing they were trying to hide. In this perspective, we see that the existential value of modern humanity, for the most part, is to act as a predatory species of its own world, sucking its resources, in order to transform the habitat into something dead, amorphous and without spirit, the total opposite of the movement , mutability and natural life. therefore, modern humanity does not have a really functional existential value. another thing that aggravates the situation for humanity is that the same, when carrying out such feats, does not actually perpetuate them, since cities, buildings, monuments, historical facts and social aspects are only possible to exist, with human presence. the non-existence of humanity would take with it all the creation left by it in a period of less than 800 years. There is nothing man-made on this planet that is durable or permanent enough to be functional in any way to the environment and therefore is always destroyed by natural forces. the value of beings is based on their manifestation and functionality towards the whole. beings whose function is totally predatory, have total extinction as a future. beings whose individuals follow nothing but natural laws and therefore maintain a balance and unity with the natural whole, guarantee its perpetuation and existential constructive value. in other words, a large part of current humanity, at least 98%, has no functional existential reason to exist and is nothing more than a disease for other living beings and habitats that, in the end, will eventually overcome it due to their vulnerability and not suitability and mastery towards natural forces. this means that the human presence on the planet is currently a power struggle. on the one hand: human beings who are mostly parasites of natural resources, trying to give value to their lives through personal beliefs, and on the other hand, the almighty nature, whose action is slow and progressive, but extremely effective in carrying out attacks in all directions with functional effects in order to reduce the population. It is interesting to note that large population leaps are always linked to huge mega social disasters, cultural decline, increased violence, and the performance of any act that goes against the very existence of the species, which always culminates in population declines. some believe it possible that technology and human science are adept enough to gain not only domination of the natural forces and habitats of the planet, but also the stellar perpetuity of humanity. however, even in our times, such statements are purely utopian in the face of true human achievements. it is only a matter of time before the human population declines to levels 90 to 95% lower than what we are now with the worsening climate crisis, potential shift in the north atlantic current, widespread continental desertification, ocean acidity, super storms , epidemic outbreaks of more lethal disease variants, changes in human behavior caused by an increasingly oppressive or liberal environment, a generalized increase in violence, wars, etc. nature is already victorious. the question is, when will be the final burial of modern humanity? population reduction is an unquestionable fact that may even be unpalatable at first, but it is the basic premise of time winners. humanity will not be able to stop this fact even if it wants to and therefore, there is no other possibility than to contribute to it, whether peacefully or violently. Modern humanity is a plague, which will inevitably be extirpated by the very nature it wants to exterminate, and probably, this extinction will be caused again, by the most unthinkable things to humans. the question is: Are you part of that species to be exterminated by time or are you something different, dissonant, a voice unified with nature? it's your choice.
