Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory how would you rank the whites?

SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

The Satoru Iwata of incels.is
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
21,996
1. White South Africans

Not only do you have dutch genes, but you are the last of the modern whites to experience what it is like to benefit from apartheid state privilege. You have three paypal mafia members: Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and David Sacks, all with roots in South Africa with absolute power in America, destined to reshape the world into technofeudalism. As well as Dricus Du Plessi, as UFC middleweight champion, a Chad with a fighting style I call Chad chaos:

2025 05 02 14 01 05 chad mem   Google Search  Mozilla Firefox


He is a tank that just absorbs hits until he hits you chaotically-- a style that is only possible with superior genes.

2. Dutch-- they are the tallest people (biggest dicked) people on earth, high in aryanness, they are well liked, intelligent, and have a country most people would prefer to live in.

3. Scandinavians-- second tallest most aryan people on earth, but slightly more soy than the dutch. If they only had whores and drugs in their country instead of socialism and faggotry.

4. Germans & Austrians & Swiss-- when you think of the master race, you think of a german, but they tend to be height mogged by the dutch and scandis.

5. Aussies-- When you think of a guy that fucks and completely does not give a shit about what others think about them you think of an Aussie.

6. English- dapper men who have a monopoly on language and mog this chart in their contributions to culture and imperialism.

7. French & Belgians-- Always super interesting culturally, but ultimately gay manlets that will be outbred and not last as a white race

8. Kiwis- similar to Aussies but they lack the pure CHAD aggression of an aussie hooligan.

9. Irish (including Bretons, Scottish, Welsh)- irish are white as fuck, but have been known to be lower class immigrants and had stints with famine in the past that put them down.

10. Italians-- although you mog culturally and are historically interesting, you are not pure enough to rank higher.

11. American whites (middle class and up)-- they are decent looking wealthy, wild, and assertive.

12. Russians-- although the Russkies mog, they are known to be untrustworthy tempramental alcoholics.

13. ASHKENAZI JEWS-- super high IQ rulers of the world, but a lot of you are imbred looking, and most of the world hates you for your puppetry. Other type of jews are not white enough to pass.

14. Spanish, Portugese, and (Latin white diaspora)-- much like italians, cunts go to your country to get gangbanged by Ferdiand and Pablo, but a lot of you are impure manlets, and ironically, your language is too associated with the wetbacks you conquered long ago.

15. Poles-- your country got ran over and over like an AM victim, so you are like white, but loser whites.

16. Finns- you are competent people with a beautiful country, but too introverted and reptilian to be acknowledged or for people to care about you to use your Finnishness as a positive.

17. Eastern Europeans (including romanians and hungarians)-- a bunch of weird whores, nobody knows enough about you culturally other than the fact that you are whores.

18. American white trash-- lowest IQ of the whites that are pretty much all born-again meth head maga retards. You can always SEAmaxx

19. Greeks- gay norwood reaper vicitms, also you have really shitty accents. The worst of all European accents.

20. Armenians-- the lowest form of white for obvious reasons.

Who am I missing??
 
Last edited:
Saar where are light skinned indians?
 
Balkanites/Dinarids+Greeks

Romanians

Hungarians

Celts like the Bretons, Scottish, Welsh, etc

Finns
 
Unfair to group American whites together IMO. A lot of different types.
 
Unfair to group American whites together IMO. A lot of different types.
Yeah I was gonna add onto this

In fact, a lot of guys I know differentiate between the Anglo-American "founding stock" kind and the more later Irish+German+Italian+Slav etc. kind

This is a meme in fact

TwoFacesofAmerica
 
Balkanites/Dinarids+Greeks

Romanians

Hungarians

Celts like the Bretons, Scottish, Welsh, etc

Finns
I have to think about the greeks & finns , but I would lump the scots & welsh with the irish

romanians & Hungarians
lump in w EE
 
if a jew can play a white in a movie, they are white to me
Some do look White, due to the fact they have one White parent & one Ashkenazi Jewish(already half-white half-Levantine) parent

So basically actual Ashkenazi Jews are more mutts/their own thing
 
I'd also argue Italians, at least the North ones, should be above Russians
 
Unfair to group American whites together IMO. A lot of different types.
i want to keep it somewhat simple

to me there's like the southern imbred white trash bringing everyone down.

I'd say the tall midwestern American is the highest SMV white male in america,

You also have surfer type dudes in Cali.

Maybe it just makes more sense to make imbred american white trash it's own category so the other white americans can rank higher
 
1. Skandis
2. Germs, dutch, french, belgs, etc
3. Brits, irish
4. USA crackers
 
1. White South Africans

Not only do you have dutch genes, but you are the last of the modern whites to experience what it is like to benefit from apartheid state privilege. You have three paypal mafia members: Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and David Sacks, all with roots in South Africa with absolute power in America, destined to reshape the world into technofeudalism. As well as Dricus Du Plessi, as UFC middleweight champion, a Chad with a fighting style I call Chad chaos:

2025 05 02 14 01 05 chad mem   Google Search  Mozilla Firefox


He is a tank that just absorbs hits until he hits you chaotically-- a style that is only possible with superior genes.

2. Dutch-- they are the tallest people on earth, high in aryanness, they are well liked, intelligent, and have a country most people would prefer to live in.

3. Scandinavians-- second tallest most aryan people on earth, but slightly more soy than the dutch. If they only had whores and drugs in their country instead of socialism and faggotry.

4. Germans & Austrians-- when you think of the master race, you think of a german, but they tend to be height mogged by the dutch and scandis.

5. Aussies-- When you think of a guy that fucks and completely does not give a shit about what others think about them you think of an Aussie.
These are the only true Whites. No others you listed are Whites.

However, Germans and Scandinavians are far more racially pure than better than White South Africans.

Balkanites/Dinarids+Greeks

Romanians
Not White -- tainted with Asiatic and Arab (turkic) blood.

Hungarians
Not White -- Hungarians (Magyars) are of Uralic and NOT Indo-European origin. They are yellow chinks.

Celts like the Bretons, Scottish, Welsh, etc
Not White, they ape-like, subhuman creatures.

Not White, tainted with Asiatic blood.

Tell me, are you one of these bastards yourself?
 
Last edited:
These are the only true Whites. No others you listed are Whites.

However, Germans and Scandinavians are far more racially pure than better than White South Africans.


Not White -- tainted with Asiatic and Arab (turkic) blood.


Not White -- Hungarians (Magyars) are of Uralic and NOT Indo-European origin. They are yellow chinks.


Not White, they ape-like, subhuman creatures.


Not White, tainted with Asiatic blood.

Tell me, are you one of these bastards yourself?
white south africans are the only TRUE whites because they have done the most culturally to maintain white purity
 
These are the only true Whites. No others you listed are Whites.

However, Germans and Scandinavians are far more racially pure than better than White South Africans.
The skandis are the most white of all, both in appearance, culture and behavior. The climate made their skin more actual white, living remote made them more reserved and thanks to the long winters they are good planners and socially awkward.
Dutch are basically ethnics compared to skandis.
 
Not White -- tainted with Asiatic and Arab (turkic) blood.

Apparently it's news to you that Arab and Turkic ancestry are two different things, and you presumably think they are the same because they generally share the same religion, Islam.
 
Why? Because Turks genocided them and you don't consider Turks to be "white?"
That's one aspect, and the fact that they were genocided causes them to act in very defensive ways. But culturally they just don't behave like whites. You're not gonna see an Armenian doing something white as fuck like treat their pets like children. They behave somewhere in between a mexican and a filipino.
 
Apparently it's news to you that Arab and Turkic ancestry are two different things, and you presumably think they are the same because they generally share the same religion, Islam.
No. Turkics are Arab. They are the same people. do not project your lies onto me.
 
I have to think about the greeks & finns , but I would lump the scots & welsh with the irish

romanians & Hungarians
lump in w EE
Maybe romanians not that sure about hungarians
 
The only true Whites are the Germanics, which the Ancient Israelites were, and the nordics.
 
Germans are transgender rights activist who are being bullied into suicide by Varangian Aryan Slavs. EE aryans won
 
Germans are transgender rights activist who are being bullied into suicide by Varangian Aryan Slavs. EE aryans won
Jfl EE has a low birth rate itself and also just recently Poland lost its last LGBT+ zone
 
That's one aspect, and the fact that they were genocided causes them to act in very defensive ways. But culturally they just don't behave like whites.

So what is your definition of "white," a mix of cultural and genetic elements?

They behave somewhere in between a mexican and a filipino.

This is probably just how you look at both people from the Caucasus and Western Asia in general.
 
You're the type of person that's very proud of their sheer ignorance, not sure if you've ever realized that.
What do you suggest that the Turkic were? There have been genetic studies that show that they are Arabs. You just don't need to speak on these topics, since clearly, you don't have the slightest clue of what you're talking about.
 
What do you suggest that the Turkic were? There have been genetic studies that show that they are Arabs. You just don't need to speak on these topics, since clearly, you don't have the slightest clue of what you're talking about.

Ah yes, of course, I forgot Turks and Arabs were synonymous and all of the reputable studies that proved as much.

Cite me one such study to prove you aren't just making this up on the spot...I'll wait.
 
Ah yes, of course, I forgot Turks and Arabs were synonymous and all of the reputable studies that proved as much.

Cite me one such study to prove you aren't just making this up on the spot...I'll wait.
There are genetic studies that prove my notion. I will not do your bidding.
 
Ah yes, of course, I forgot Turks and Arabs were synonymous and all of the reputable studies that proved as much.

Cite me one such study to prove you aren't just making this up on the spot...I'll wait.
DNA does NOT work for genealogy. History does just fine.

Turkics are the descendants of Ham, like most of modern Arabia, and just like the other nations of the East. They were scattered after Babel and they’re part of the broader Semitic-Hamitic line.

The truth is simple: the Turkic peoples are from Ham, and their history, when it is stripped of modern (((propaganda))), makes that clear.
 
DNA does NOT work for genealogy. History does just fine.

Turkics are the descendants of Ham, like most of modern Arabia, and just like the other nations of the East. They were scattered after Babel and they’re part of the broader Semitic-Hamitic line.

The truth is simple: the Turkic peoples are from Ham, and their history, when it is stripped of modern (((propaganda))), makes that clear.

Genesis 10:6-7 (Descendants of Ham):
"The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan. The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabtechah; and the sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan."

Genesis 10:1-5 (Descendants of Japheth):
"Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth; and sons were born to them after the flood. The sons of Japheth were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah; and the sons of Javan were Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations."

Genesis 11:8-9 (The Tower of Babel):
"So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they stopped building the city. Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth."
 
DNA does NOT work for genealogy. History does just fine.

Turkics are the descendants of Ham, like most of modern Arabia, and just like the other nations of the East. They were scattered after Babel and they’re part of the broader Semitic-Hamitic line.

The truth is simple: the Turkic peoples are from Ham, and their history, when it is stripped of modern (((propaganda))), makes that clear.

So first it was "There have been genetic studies that show that they are Arabs" then when I asked you to show me one of these supposed "genetic studies" that prove all Turks = all Arabs, you predictably did not do so.

You are flat-out just invoking Abrahamic mythology at this point to try to justify your notion that what we call Turks and Arabs are not distinct groups, an obviously nonsensical claim that no scholar would take seriously, when it's common knowledge Turks originally came from north-east Asia, the region that now includes the modern state of Mongolia. As for Arabs, of course the Arabian peninsula, especially the modern countries of Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

You obviously are trying to make "Turks" (what are called "Turks" now could be anyone that speaks a Turkic derived language, from Anatolian people in Turkey descended from Hittites and Greeks who speak the modern dialect known as "Turkish," to anyone that inhabits a Turkic speaking region; Tatars, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Azeris, Uyghurs, Kyrgyz...) and "Arabs" (again: people will describe "Arabs" to mean anyone who speaks Arabic and is from a Muslim majority nation; Maltese speak an Arabic dialect but due to being Catholic conspicuously never get referred to as such...) synonymous because they're both predominantly Muslim groups; the fact you invoked Abrahamic mythology in a feeble attempt to "prove" this demonstrates as much.

Like any other typical white nationalist, you feel a need to homogenize all Muslim peoples in the same category because it helps to justify your ahistorical world-view.
 
Last edited:
The truth is simple: the Turkic peoples are from Ham, and their history, when it is stripped of modern (((propaganda))), makes that clear.

Tell me what the motive of "the Jews" is to brainwash people into thinking that Turks and Arabs are not synonymous.

Also if I didn't know what I did I'd say something like: "if the Jews are the main force in your mind responsible for misleading people from your understanding, then why do you invoke their scripture in the Torah?" but I am aware that you distinguish the ancient Hebrew Israelites from modern Jews whose religion is Rabbinic Judaism, a distinct creed that is derived from the religion of the Hebrew Israelites but is very different in belief and practice.

You are absolutely right to distinguish them; (part of the insanity of Judaism is making these groups to be synonymous, not a mindset the most well-read Jewish person could have, but unfortunately a widely held mistaken notion) but obviously not the way you do so and you undoubtedly have some crank theory as to what "the Jews" in the world today are whether that's "the Khazar theory" or some other notion to justify your mindset: "they are not ❝The Real Ones❞ and are fakers." (in fact modern Ashkenazi Jews have far less Semitic ancestry than Arabs in the Middle East today, but they still have some so are not making up the notion they can trace back to ancient Hebrew Israelites.)
 
Last edited:
Boers should be near the bottom. They're basically failed American Whites and mostly stuck in South Africa because the Netherlands and much of Europe is extremely overpopulated.

Even the radicals don't want to rerun the country and are just trying to establish a homeland (Volkstaat) in Western South Africa.


Hitler's Germany ruined the colonial experience for Europeans. Without him and the Bolshevik rise in the October revolution, ethnics would still be globally enslaved. In the modern day, Germans have zero sense of nationalism.

Italians (South Europeans) contributed to the ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews.

Russians are seen as Asiatic barbarians who are not truly European.

Eastern Europeans are seen as weird, lower-tier Whites.

Like you said, Scandinavian countries are socially and culturally finished.

The French are the highest class of Whites. Plus, many Francophone countries are de-facto colonies of France.

Anglos. I don't need to say too much. Anglos conquered Australia, Canada, and America. And act as the global police. They are the Whites of Whites in a sense.

^
My list from worst to best.
 
Last edited:
There are genetic studies that prove my notion. I will not do your bidding.

LOL, as if that isn't the most pathetic excuse I ever heard.

You can't cite any studies because they don't exist and you can't admit that you just made it up. No serious scholar who does genetic research would make as asinine a claim as "Arabs and Turks are the same group," much less cite Biblical scripture/mythology to supposedly prove that that is the case. You are the most laughable white nationalist I have ever interacted with on this site.

You are obviously younger than I am, who knows, maybe you'll grow out of this mindset one day.
 
So first it was "There have been genetic studies that show that they are Arabs" then when I asked you to show me one of these supposed "genetic studies" that prove all Turks = all Arabs, you predictably did not do so.

You are flat-out just invoking Abrahamic mythology at this point to try to justify your notion that what we call Turks and Arabs are not distinct groups, an obviously nonsensical claim that no scholar would take seriously, when it's common knowledge Turks originally came from north-east Asia, the region that now includes the modern state of Mongolia. As for Arabs, of course the Arabian peninsula, especially the modern countries of Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

You obviously are trying to make "Turks" (what are called "Turks" now could be anyone that speaks a Turkic derived language, from Anatolian people in Turkey descended from Hittites and Greeks who speak the modern dialect known as "Turkish," to anyone that inhabits a Turkic speaking region; Tatars, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Azeris, Uyghurs, Kyrgyz...) and "Arabs," (again: people will describe "Arabs" to mean anyone who speaks Arabic and is from a Muslim majority nation; Maltese speak an Arabic dialect but due to being Catholic conspicuously never get referred to as such...) synonymous because they're both predominantly Muslim groups; the fact you invoked Abrahamic mythology in a feeble attempt to "prove" this demonstrates as much.

Like any other typical white nationalist, you feel a need to homogenize all Muslim peoples in the same category because it helps to justify your ahistorical world-view.
You fucking nigger, you’re so deep in the globalist matrix, you can’t even see the chains around your mind. Your whole argument is a patchwork of (((mainstream))) lies. Turks/Turkics and Arabs are the same, and are tied by the blood of Ham, as laid out in Genesis 10. Why do you pass around terms like "North Central Asia" or "Anatolian Hittites" to confuse me? You are just incorrect. The Turkic peoples didn’t "migrate" from Mongolia either, that is a lie peddled by academics.

They were scattered after Babel, just like the Arabs, as part of a Semitic-Hamitic line. You try to paint me as an ignorant to silence me, but I’m not the one twisting history. I’m exposing the ancient truths that (((they))) don’t want you to know.

The descendants of Ham (Cush, Egypt, Put, Canaan, and their offshoots) spread across the East, including Turkey and Arabia. The "Turkic" peoples are just a branch of that tree. Tatars, Kazakhs, Uyghurs are all part of the Hamitic line, and their differences exaggerated by those who profit from chaos, such as yourself. Saudi Arabia or Yemen do not define Arabs. That’s just geography. The maltese Catholic veneer doesn’t change their Semitic roots.

My worldview is rooted in the truth of scripture. DNA can be a tool of deception.

I’m not here to do your bidding or play the games. Don’t come at me with this recycled talking points and come to expect me to bow to your false gods of "evidence" and "reason."

The truth IS IN BIBLE, in the scattering of Babel, in the bloodlines of Ham.

Stop parroting words that seem true. You are just a zionist, globalist shill.
 
LOL, as if that isn't the most pathetic excuse I ever heard.

You can't cite any studies because they don't exist and you can't admit that you just made it up. No serious scholar who does genetic research would make as asinine a claim as "Arabs and Turks are the same group," much less cite Biblical scripture/mythology to supposedly prove that that is the case. You are the most laughable white nationalist I have ever interacted with on this site.

You are obviously younger than I am, who knows, maybe you'll grow out of this mindset one day.
You’re so predictable, clinging to (((mainstream science))) :feelshaha:. So what if I’m younger? What does that matter? You're just seething a big time
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
9
Views
503
lifeisfucked215
lifeisfucked215
Stupid Clown
Replies
11
Views
468
General Franco
General Franco
TouhouMathcel
Replies
55
Views
2K
Epedaphic
Epedaphic

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Abou Baldiaby
  • Xpvfz
  • Choler
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top