Experiment How to sabotage the Incel Terroristic Shooting Organization (VER)

[GhostedPhantom]

If every toilet takes one for the team and fucks one incel for just a month to take his virginity (and then mysteriously dumps him), that incel will be tainted forever. He won't be able to join this forum because he has ascended and therefore is a fakecel. Even if he chooses to hide this from others, he'll always doubt whether he really is an incel or not and he'll have a false hope of ascension.

Why am I not afraid of giving them this idea? Because they're too chad-only to even consider doing this. Whatever toilet lurkers may read this are probably vomiting at the idea of committing an act as heinous as giving any of us a chance at ascension.

 

[SociallyStupid]

No, if that actually happened (I know it won't) the definition of "incel" in this forum would simply change and exclude "sex for ulterior motives". This is actually consistent with escortcels not being banned here: Escorts also don't want the sex on its own, but the money - and if we generalize that to all kinds of favours, it would still make sense.

 

[telamon]

I've thought about this before. One foid could suck 100's of our dicks if she volunteered. Its akin to having a huge surplus of food but refusing to give it to starving people.

 

[GhostedPhantom]

No, if that actually happened (I know it won't) the definition of "incel" in this forum would simply change and exclude "sex for ulterior motives". This is actually consistent with escortcels not being banned here: Escorts also don't want the sex on its own, but the money - and if we generalize that to all kinds of favours, it would still make sense.

I made the implicit assumption that the foids would keep their motives for these short relationships hidden. The lines would get even blurrier if their reason for dumping incels is that they've found someone better because that can happen to normies too.

 

[GhostedPhantom]

I've thought about this before. One foid could suck 100's of our dicks if she volunteered. Its akin to having a huge surplus of food but refusing to give it to starving people.

Not quite. It would work against us. It would be like giving all starving African kids full meals for a month and then being like "look, they're well-fed" and stopping all charities for starving African kids.

 

[SociallyStupid]

I made the implicit assumption that the foids would keep their motives for these short relationships hidden. The lines would get even blurrier if their reason for dumping incels is that they've found someone better because that can happen to normies too.

Look, if everyone can have let's say a one-month relationship once in their lifetime, then the definition of Incel here would become not being able to achieve a long term relationship or a significant density of short-term relationships.

Technically the definition of incel doesn't mean that you _never_ had the chance to have sex, but just that you _currently_ don't have the chance of sex. The rules for this forum are just stricter because there are a lot of Incels who even fulfill these stricter rules and it makes a good boundary, but isn't necessary. Even the more liberal definition of Incel would still reject women as the vast majority have easy access to free sex, so it wouldn't even be a radical change.