Serious how to iq flex in math class

[Albertopenheimer]

HERES HOW TO FIND THE VERTEX OF A PARABOLA WITH ONLY ONE KNOWN VALUE

Heres how:
A vertex in this context is the middle of the spike at the parabola

Introduction:

What values represent what varibles

In some cases theres no p*x, but in those cases its not shown/written because p=0.
I will explain with an example, cuz its the best way to do so.
Example equation:

You also could say

Thats the parabola:

The first number tells the x(left and right) position of it, the second the y(up and down)

With every point the x position gets bigger, so does the y position.
calculate like we dont know the position of point P, A and L. We only know the position of Q

Main part:

[calculating what x and y equals]:

[inserting a slitghtly different value for the x position (Do it with the value of "1" ) compared to the known one, therefore creating a new point]
[checking if he can lie on the parabola; if not do it it in the other direction]

P -> A -> L -> Q

(I fact) The difference between P and A y-value is 1
(II fact) The difference between A and L y-value is 3
(III fact) The difference between L and Q y-value is 5

And as i tried it out with more points, the value difference of the y position keeps increasing by 2


Now:
[get the y-difference between the created point and your start point]
[subtract your y pos every time; but every time u do it subtract by a 2 values lower number (only all the times after the first time of subracting)]
[dont keep subtracting if you just subtracted by 1]
>now u know the y pos of the parabola
[insert it into f(x) and get x to know]
>know u know the vertex of the parabola

 

[Asgard]

AKA, just have above average fluid intelligence, bro!

Spoiler: Harsh truth for IQ deniers

Not everyone (85% of the general population) can do higher math.

In fact, WMI is positively, highly correlated with your mathematic ability. So that shows pretty much how critical is having an actual, far above-average IQ when it comes to pursuing a math heavy career.

 

[Asgard]

the other things are explained in like 8th grade

memorization =/= actual understanding

 

[Asgard]

k delete your other responses, you could be suspected to be below 18 y/o

I'm not well versed in mathematics, so what? And that is most definitely not a sign of mental "maturity" by any means. Not everyone is meant to understand (or apply) mathematics in a meaningful way.

 

[iicc66]

HERES HOW TO FIND THE VERTEX OF A PARABOLA WITH ONLY ONE KNOW POINT

Heres how:
A vertex in this context is the middle of the spike at the parabola

Introduction:

What values represent what varibles

View attachment 1451431

View attachment 1451432

In some cases theres no p*x, but in those cases its not shown/written because p=0.
I will explain with an example, cuz its the best way to do so.
Example equation:
View attachment 1451434
You also could say
View attachment 1451437
Thats the parabola:
View attachment 1451438



The first number tells the x(left and right) position of it, the second the y(up and down)
View attachment 1451449
View attachment 1451447

With every point the x position gets bigger, so does the y position.
calculate like we dont know the position of point P, A and L. We only know the position of Q

Main part:

[calculating what x and y equals]:

[inserting a slitghtly different value for the x position (Do it with the value of "1" ) compared to the known one, therefore creating a new point]
[checking if he can lie on the parabola; if not do it it in the other direction]

P -> A -> L -> Q

(I fact) The difference between P and A y-value is 1
(II fact) The difference between A and L y-value is 3
(III fact) The difference between L and Q y-value is 5

And as i tried it out with more points, the value difference of the y position keeps increasing by 2

{
Next stage as a sentence
So as we know what y position q is on, we can create L
Than knowing that theres a value difference of the y position of 5 and that its the 3th fact (see up in the thread), we know that u have to go down 5 units on y pos., than 3 units, than 2 units and lastly to go to the vertex 1 unit
The same stage as a to do list
[get the y-difference between the created point and your start point]
[subtract your y pos every time; but every time u do it subtract by a 2 values lower number (only all the times after the first time of subracting)]
[dont keep subtracting if you just subtracted by 1]
>now u know the y pos of the parabola
[insert it into f(x) and get x to know]
>know u know the vertex of the parabola
}

No fucking idea what that is, chatgpt did my exam hope i dont fail

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

Just derivate and equate to 0 my nigga

 

[Albertopenheimer]

Just derivate and equate to 0 my nigga

but the vertex isnt alway on x=0 or y=0

 

[Failed Pullout]

AKA, just have above average fluid intelligence, bro!

Spoiler: Harsh truth for IQ deniers

Not everyone (85% of the general population) can do higher math.

In fact, WMI is positively, highly correlated with your mathematic ability. So that shows pretty much how critical is having an actual, far above-average IQ when it comes to pursuing a math heavy career.

"There are different types of intelligence bro" Like no it's safe to say if you struggle with math you are at best low average.

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

but the vertex isnt alway on x=0 or y=0

And? It works as well

 

[Asgard]

"There are different types of intelligence bro" Like no it's safe to say if you struggle with math you are at best low average.

What are you even talking about? Your Working Memory Index is a component of your FSIQ.

 

[Failed Pullout]

What are you even talking about? Your Working Memory Index is a component of your FSIQ.

People will usually say retarded shit like "you have emotional intelligence" "maybe you're just a bad test taker" at people who struggle with logic problems especially math to make them feel better.

 

[Friezacel]

I excelled at English but was absolutely terrible at school

 

[Albertopenheimer]

nvm, it was firstly meant to be clickbait, than i fell for it. U need 2 points, with x and y values
but the correct vers. is still original engough to flex

 

[Albertopenheimer]

And? It works as well

but than there wouldnt be no flex