Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel how to combat incel frustrations: outlaw giving fellatio to week-old babies unless the newborn boy will grow up to be a gigachad

Wiz32BlackJiggaboo

Wiz32BlackJiggaboo

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2018
Posts
19,738
I'm sure we have some kind of tech that can predict future attractiveness of a days-old baby looking at his bone structure, but if not, we could I think reasonably predict his likelihood of growing up to be a gigachad based on doing massive decile ranking scales of adults and designating him as "giga-destined" if both his parents are 10/10 gigachad and gigastacy.

I realize that there is an important scientific value to having some baby penises put in mouths before their 2nd week of breathing air outside of the womb: it is necessary to do this as part of the efficient Hebrew ritual which scalps the head/glans of the penis, amputating the prepuce which can transmit STDs.

STDs are a big concern for gigachads because they constantly get offers of free sex: they can't reasonably be expected to afford the amount of condoms it would take to keep up with the amount of sexual partners thrust upon them.

In interest of pursuing EQUITY so that gigachads only need to buy as many condoms as incels do (maybe 1 per year when they can afford an escort on minimum wage) it is important that we take every step possible to protect gigachad health from STDs, and they is why they should be circumcised in the safest way possible: by a bearded hook-nosed rabbi who will quickly bathe his exposed bleeding stump in the healing saliva of his mouth.

I don't believe we should continue to allow this practise for sub-gigachad males though. I believe the amount of sex that sub-gigachad males are able to achieve is minimal enough that we should be able to afford a brand-new condom for each instance of sex. We are not burdened with thousands of sexual invitations like gigachad (poor guy) who just can't afford that many condoms: since the only way we can get sex is by escorts or betabuxing, and since that's so expensive already (no less than two hundred bucks a coom I would imagine) adding another $1 for a condom (or whatever iti s they cost, never actually bought any TBH) is probably less than a 0.5% tax on the charge.

You have to understand though: with the amount of money that gigachad pays for his sexual encounters, probably $2 for bus fare or something, that $1 per condom is like a 50% tax on his sexual expenses. This is just not EQUITABLE for Gigachad so it is 100% medically necessary to circumcise Chad to protect him from the STDs he will inevitably get from his dozens/hundreds of sexual partners since he won't feasibly be able to afford enough condoms to keep up with his sex life.

The government should pay for these mandatory circumcisions of gigachad-to-be-babies, in the long run it will cost a lot less than buying thousands of condoms when he is older. You have to understand that even if we did that, gigachad probably would lack the presence of mind to use them because foids would be leaping on his cock quicker than he could rip open the package. They also want his babies so they will poke holes in condoms and let STDs through: so we need to make sure gigachad has no prepuce for STDs to hide in.

A side benefit of this is I think there will be much less incel anger in the world, because I think circumcised incels are angrier than uncircumcised incels. I believe there is an inherent sense of anger, persecution and paranoia that occurs when your genitalia are ritualistically scalped in a nepiopedophilic blood ritual, and it's really hard to come back from that and love humanity.

I believe also this will make incels more competetive as sexual partners since they will have a size advantage over gigachad due to not having half their dicks cut off. It will also make sex with incels much more pleasant to foids since it will be lower-friction.

Chad doesn't need to worry about this: foids get 100% maximum wet for him so it doesn't matter if he lacks a mobile sheath. Foids will also provide free lube for Chad to fuck them, while incels would be expected to purchase their own lube.

I also think that we should protect future gigachads against herpes. Herpes can live in your lips, those folds of skin are providing a moist dark area for bacteria and viruses to grow. We should permanently expose gigachads' wonderful teeth to the air and light to prevent infections.

Gigachad will inevitably be kissed by thousands of girls: his mouth will become a bacterial soup if we do not take steps to amputate to protect him from infections.

Sub-gigachads do not need this since they kiss so rarely: sometimes not at all. They don't have to be anywhere near as concerned about contracting Herpes from kissing, so they should be able to retain their lips.
 
1616773685135
 
I bet in Amphibia they don't slice off the tips of the frog dicks, that's why Anne loves them so much
 
Brutal. This thread took a lot of effort to make but almost no reply.
 
Brutal. This thread took a lot of effort to make but almost no reply.
TBH wondering if I was too subtle, are people offput because they're too literal?
Sometimes a proposal can be TOO modest I guess
 
what nigga
Have the government pay rabbis to suck baby-chad's cock to limit STDs, and leave subhuman males uncircumcised to be sexually competitive.

Just ignore OP, tbh ngl ded srs. He has full-blown, coomer-fueled autism.
 
Have the government pay rabbis to suck baby-chad's cock to limit STDs, and leave subhuman males uncircumcised to be sexually competitive.

Just ignore OP, tbh ngl ded srs. He has full-blown, coomer-fueled autism.

I just explained things in detail sir.

Also I didn't say anything about the government paying the rabbis to do this, obvious the chad baby's chad dad should pay for it.
You're correct post-comma though
 
I just explained things in detail sir.

Also I didn't say anything about the government paying the rabbis to do this, obvious the chad baby's chad dad should pay for it.
What do you call this, then:
The government should pay for these mandatory circumcisions of gigachad-to-be-babies, in the long run it will cost a lot less than buying thousands of condoms when he is older.
Is the government supposed to be paying for these circumcisions or chad's dad?
 
Ah TBH forgot I wrote that. Let's have both: the government will partially offset the cost like 10% and chad-dad pays the other 90%
 
I feel like these curt replies are done by people too inattentive to read the post or too low-IQ to process it.
Or you're just unnecessarily abstruse with your words, bro, just like that word in this sentence that I didn't need to use. As a general rule, if the average reader needs to consult a dictionary or thesaurus multiple times, or need you to clarify things, the problem isn't really with their vocabulary or comprehension. It could be, but it usually isn't.
 
Or you're just unnecessarily abstruse with your words, bro, just like that word in this sentence that I didn't need to use.
I'm glad you did though, reflexively wanted to make fun of a typo but looked it up first... is ironic how obscure it's usei s?

As a general rule, if the average reader needs to consult a dictionary or thesaurus multiple times, or need you to clarify things, the problem isn't really with their vocabulary or comprehension. It could be, but it usually isn't.

We sometimes have different ideas of what words should be common knowledge though.

Which ones in particular invoke the most criticism from you and what should I have substituted?
 
We sometimes have different ideas of what words should be common knowledge though.

Which ones in particular invoke the most criticism from you and what should I have substituted?
In the case of your post it's not so much the use of uncommon words, but the unneeded verbosity to get your point across. It's not about "dumbing it down" but being adroit with how you make your point without being convoluted. Adding unnecessary complexity can easily weaken the point you're trying to get across.
 
thats gross as hell wtf are you even talking about ew
 
In the case of your post it's not so much the use of uncommon words, but the unneeded verbosity to get your point across
Examples?

. It's not about "dumbing it down" but being adroit with how you make your point without being convoluted. Adding unnecessary complexity can easily weaken the point you're trying to get across.

Swift's Modest Proposal was what, around 25 pages?

Unnecessary complexity can be the point.

If you're too concise then the obvious topic jumps out at people instead of sneaking up on them.

I find if you let an idea brew and sneak up it has more dramatic impact, potentially.
thats gross as hell wtf are you even talking about ew
Happy 2-week anniversary preteencel

We are discussing how mohels should limit prepuce amputation and homosexual fellatio to only attractive baby boys instead of doing it to ugly ones too as they presently do. Dial it back a bit.

Please also enjoy my other thread on how in the interest of feminism we should engage in a full 3-step (mil'ah/pri'ah/metsis'ah) bris for newborn baby girls.
 
Last edited:
Examples?
The whole thing, tbh ngl. It reads like stream of consciousness rambling.

Swift's Modest Proposal was what, around 25 pages?

Unnecessary complexity can be the point.

If you're too concise then the obvious topic jumps out at people instead of sneaking up on them.

I find if you let an idea brew and sneak up it has more dramatic impact, potentially.
OK, so you want dramatic effect. Sure, whatever.
 
Im confused tbh. Are they really sucking babies dick?
 
Chad obsessed
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top