That makes sense, what do you think might replace it as a distinguishing factor in that case?
Skills, abilities, social rank, or, government position.
We live in the age now where appearance is a subtle irony to women, for those who are ugly. So if people in general have something SO IN RELATION TO POWER/ GLAMOR as looks being generally taken care of, then women will then desire to make status have its heyday.
But women are also genetically wired to hyperemphasize looks, and build the halo effect off of it, based on the attainmentmaze stigma around it, and the distinguishment of having it as well. They may just microanalyze whose looks are better, which in turn with geno splicing may make a new conformity.
Women like conformity, but they like it because it established beta for the alpha also. And defines the capacities of the people they're with to have some kind of moderation so that those who exceed it they can be with. Hence why women are slightly opposed to a nazi germany society, and love to have a shadow elite governing everything. Because then that allows them a hiding space of power once they become a part of it. Thing they hate though is not being a part of it.
Mankind's shadow elite is a tacit reflection of human nature/ forms of government/ capitalism, and communism is just a gloss over mankind's shadow elite as well (NKVD, stalin, lenin, kremlin, etc).
Women in general like to be beyond what it standard/ custom and with what is dominarchally distinguished. Even if it has to be minuscule.Women are attracted to predators, and the more ominous/ ethereal/ mysterious the notion of it is, then the more attractive/ formidable.