Blackpill How the fuck can you claim to be blackpilled but also are religious?

[Deleted member 38748]

Jfl being an atheist is 100% the default view. People only believe in religion because they are indoctrinated into it before their balls have even dropped.

And also the burden of proof has nothing to do with how popular a belief is GrAYfag.

Atheists will try explain away God by showing how belief in God originates – but this commits the genetic fallacy.

Burden Of Proof in Theism vs Atheism: There is no need to ‘prove’ God does Not exist?

Often times, one will hear an atheist assert that there is no need to prove God does not exist. This claim, however, is simply a massive generalization. Burden of proof : Is the obligation on a par…

refutingatheism.wordpress.com

The Presumption of Atheism on Trial

It’s become fashionable to say atheism has no burden of proof. It’s said atheism is the default assumption and the onus is on the theist to prove, not on the atheist to disprove. While this idea h…

prudencelouise.com

 

[Deleted member 34772]

Burden Of Proof in Theism vs Atheism: There is no need to ‘prove’ God does Not exist?

Often times, one will hear an atheist assert that there is no need to prove God does not exist. This claim, however, is simply a massive generalization. Burden of proof : Is the obligation on a par…

refutingatheism.wordpress.com

The Presumption of Atheism on Trial

It’s become fashionable to say atheism has no burden of proof. It’s said atheism is the default assumption and the onus is on the theist to prove, not on the atheist to disprove. While this idea h…

prudencelouise.com

These links mean nothing jfl

You cannot make just make a claim out of thin air without any empirical evidence.

Just because other people are christian doesn’t mean atheist magically hold the burden of proof. There are thousands of other religions with large followings as well.

 

[Deleted member 38748]

These links mean nothing jfl

You cannot make just make a claim out of thin air without any empirical evidence.

Just because other people are christian doesn’t mean atheist magically hold the burden of proof. There are thousands of other religions with large followings as well.

you didnt even read it (obviously)

if you're an atheist, you are making the claim, that there is no god at all and that the universe just was created out of nothing.

see the teleological argument

also, the claim is not "out of thin air"

 

[Deleted member 34772]

you didnt even read it (obviously)

Skimmed through both articles. You are quoting these like they are peer reviewed studies and not biased articles written by some religious nuts.

Imaging citing a BLOG named

Refuting Atheism

Logic, Reason & God

refutingatheism.wordpress.com

As actual evidence
Jfl

if you're an atheist, you are making the claim, that there is no god at all and that the universe just was created out of nothing.

This is not true at all

teleological argument

Has been debunked countless times

Teleological Argument

View: https://youtu.be/PHmjHMbkOUM

 

[Deleted member 38748]

Skimmed through both articles. You are quoting these like they are peer reviewed studies and not biased articles written by some religious nuts.

you are not gonna have "peer reviewed" studies, about burden of proof philosophy

and calling them "religious nuts", is just an ad hominem fallacy

This is not true at all

yes it is. who made the universe then? if you believe it was created by someone, thats a form of theism

if you believe it was not created, then it happened by itself without then that is atheism

Has been debunked countless times

Teleological Argument

• If we extrapolate from the nature of the universe to the nature of its creator then we should infer from the finitude of the universe that the Creator is finite.​

lol, we dont know if the universe is finite, and even if it was, that doesnt mean we can assume the creator is finite. the creator god, being the one where it began, would have to be eternal. unless he suddenly appeared out of nowhere, but how would that have arisen? it doesnt just happen. god is supernatural

• In human experience, complex enterprises require teamwork. This suggests that creation is a joint enterprise. There is no single God, then, but rather a family or committee of gods.​

you are trying to apply human projects, which are done by beings with limited power, to that of an omnipotent god

View:
View: https://youtu.be/PHmjHMbkOUM

evolution has never been "proven", at least macro evolution anyway. micro evolution has been shown to have some truth though. this dude has just made up that all these different species all have a single common ancestor

also the creation of living organisms, resulting from inorganic material, has never been replicated

 

[Deleted member 34772]

you are not gonna have "peer reviewed" studies, about burden of proof philosophy

You are literally claiming that a god exists yet have absolutely no empirical evidence. If a god exists and he interacts with reality then it should be measurable in some way (like the global flood which never happened). If god doesn’t interact with reality in any measurable way then why should we treat him as though he exists?

and calling them "religious nuts", is just an ad hominem fallacy

You literally cited a fucking wordpress BLOG called refuting atheism as if I should take them seriously jfl. At least I quoted an actual edu website. Muh ad hominem.

yes it is. who made the universe then? if you believe it was created by someone, thats a form of theism

I don’t know who made the universe or how is came to be before the big bang. That is the difference between atheists and theists. Theists claim to know the truths to the universe are in their 3000 year old book while atheists acknowledge the limits of their knowledge.

We cannot know anything that happened “before” the universe existed. For all intents in purposes NOTHING existence before the big bang (as far as we know).

if you believe it was not created, then it happened by itself without then that is atheism

Atheism never makes any claims about how the universe was created. We simply just do not agree with the claim that a god exists, LET ALONE your god.

evolution has never been "proven", at least macro evolution anyway. micro evolution has been shown to have some truth though.

There is no such thing as “micro” or “macro” evolution. This is a common creationist talking point. There is evolution over a short period of time, then there is evolution over a long period of time.

also the creation of living organisms, resulting from inorganic material, has never been replicated

Okay

 

[Deleted member 38748]

You are literally claiming that a god exists yet have absolutely no empirical evidence. If a god exists and he interacts with reality then it should be measurable in some way (like the global flood which never happened). If god doesn’t interact with reality in any measurable way then why should we treat him as though he exists?

the global flood has many stories of it happening in many different historical cultures, people just dismiss it as a "myth".

I don’t know who made the universe or how is came to be before the big bang. That is the difference between atheists and theists. Theists claim to know the truths to the universe are in their 3000 year old book while atheists acknowledge the limits of their knowledge.

We cannot know anything that happened “before” the universe existed. For all intents in purposes NOTHING existence before the big bang (as far as we know).

you seem more like an agnostic, than an atheist then

There is no such thing as “micro” or “macro” evolution. This is a common creationist talking point. There is evolution over a short period of time, then there is evolution over a long period of time.

you can literally look up the differences of macro and micro evolution

Difference Between Micro- Evolution and Macro-Evolution (with Comparison Chart) - Bio Differences

Micro-evolution refers to the alteration in a gene pool of the population over time, resulting in small changes of an organism in the same species. On the other hand, Macro-evolution refers to the alteration in organisms, and these changes gradually give rise to completely new species, which is...

biodifferences.com

Okay