Footmat
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2018
- Posts
- 318
This witch-hunt to Weinstein shows exactly, how society protects and defends only women and that absolute independetly of how they behave in the same case. Let me tell you why:
Situation: A attractive role in a Film is offered. Two parties are involved. The producer (Weinstein) and the actress. The second party is not only one actress, it is "sum X" actresses, who want to join the role. Weinstein is a fat ugly men, the ONLY reason, the foids met him, is to be statusmaxxed by him. Now, he isn´t a cuck and he know, his status let him give the possibility to have sex with many stacys. Without beeing subtile, he let the women know, how to boost their career. And here is the point, where the hypocrisy begins:
As this behavior was revealed, the witch-hunt called "me-too" began. Of course, if some foid regret his offer, she was disadvantaged to the foid, who accept it and spread her legs wich is not since yesterday a carrer-boost in Hollywood......it always was. But who is demanding of the actresses, wich get their roles, boosted their career with vagina-cheating (my word for women that boost their career with sex) ? THEY made it possible, that producers choose this way to offer roles. Where is the condemn of the masses? Since today, i can´t find anything about the women, wich vagina-cheated. So we learn: Actress regret = Victim. Actress accept = silence. Not one word about the sluts, who made it possible. No speculation who could be the actresses who accept. No, where they choose the other offender? Right, to the male actors and their "silence". And the male actors are much less involved that the female ones. But who cares about female "silencen" in this case? Right, nobody !
Situation: A attractive role in a Film is offered. Two parties are involved. The producer (Weinstein) and the actress. The second party is not only one actress, it is "sum X" actresses, who want to join the role. Weinstein is a fat ugly men, the ONLY reason, the foids met him, is to be statusmaxxed by him. Now, he isn´t a cuck and he know, his status let him give the possibility to have sex with many stacys. Without beeing subtile, he let the women know, how to boost their career. And here is the point, where the hypocrisy begins:
As this behavior was revealed, the witch-hunt called "me-too" began. Of course, if some foid regret his offer, she was disadvantaged to the foid, who accept it and spread her legs wich is not since yesterday a carrer-boost in Hollywood......it always was. But who is demanding of the actresses, wich get their roles, boosted their career with vagina-cheating (my word for women that boost their career with sex) ? THEY made it possible, that producers choose this way to offer roles. Where is the condemn of the masses? Since today, i can´t find anything about the women, wich vagina-cheated. So we learn: Actress regret = Victim. Actress accept = silence. Not one word about the sluts, who made it possible. No speculation who could be the actresses who accept. No, where they choose the other offender? Right, to the male actors and their "silence". And the male actors are much less involved that the female ones. But who cares about female "silencen" in this case? Right, nobody !
Last edited: