Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

How tall is this forum?

What is your height

  • 5'7 or less (manlet)

    Votes: 13 19.1%
  • 5'7 - 6'3 (avg)

    Votes: 52 76.5%
  • 6'3 or above (tall)

    Votes: 3 4.4%

  • Total voters
    68
fred_herbert

fred_herbert

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Posts
468
I am a former lookism and r/incels poster. I have noticed that there are many (extreme) manlets on this forum. What I would like to figure out is if the proportion of manlets on this forum is higher than the population proportion.

Asumptions:

- population is all young adult males residing in western countries
- the population is normally distrubted
- mean is 5'11 / 180 cm
- stdev is 2.75 in / 7 cm
- a manlet is anyone under 5'7 / 170 cm

Given those asumptions the proportion of manlets in the population is:

0.0766 or 7.66 percent.

rmsEgdp.pnghttp:


So to test this hypothesis I would like anyone who lives in a western country (MANLET OR NOT) to vote in the poll so that we can put a nail in the coffin on height theory once and for all. I will provide the results once we have obtained a reasonably sized sample.
 
Lmao, here (as in where I live) anything below 6'0 is manlet. No exceptions.
 
I'd be interested in a genuine height poll. I wonder what the mean Incel height is.
 
6'3, posture of a neanderthal hunchback orangutan
 
Well so far 16% are below 5'7, which is more than 2 times higher than the proportion in the general population (7%). Not surprising, but we need more data to confirm this for sure.
 
5'11

My face ruins me though.
 
fred_herbert said:
I am a former lookism and r/incels poster. I have noticed that there are many (extreme) manlets on this forum. What I would like to figure out is if the proportion of manlets on this forum is higher than the population proportion.

Asumptions:

- population is all young adult males residing in western countries
- the population is normally distrubted
- mean is 5'11 / 180 cm
- stdev is 2.75 in / 7 cm
- a manlet is anyone under 5'7 / 170 cm

Given those asumptions the proportion of manlets in the population is:

0.0766 or 7.66 percent.

rmsEgdp.pnghttp:


So to test this hypothesis I would like anyone who lives in a western country (MANLET OR NOT) to vote in the poll so that we can put a nail in the coffin on height theory once and for all. I will provide the results once we have obtained a reasonably sized sample.
So you call us manlet, a clearly pejorative term, but somehow want to prove that height isn't a big deal?
Sure you might be tall and ugly but that doesn't mean height is also not a deal breaker to femoids. They are extremely picky and many different things matter.
 
fred_herbert said:
Well so far 16% are below 5'7, which is more than 2 times higher than the proportion in the general population (7%). Not surprising, but we need more data to confirm this for sure.

It seems there's a lot more manlets here than in the general population. What else would've happened?
 
Kointo said:
It seems there's a lot more manlets here than in the general population. What else would've happened?

Well I know it's obvious, I just wanted to prove it. Because there's many copers who think being a manlet (sub 5'7) isn't a death sentence.
 
FeminismsCancer said:
So you call us manlet, a clearly pejorative term, but somehow want to prove that height isn't a big deal?
Sure you might be tall and ugly but that doesn't mean height is also not a deal breaker to femoids. They are extremely picky and many different things matter.

Why did you assume he was trying to prove it false? He's trying to prove that it's true. Look at his latest post.
 
Kointo said:
Why did you assume he was trying to prove it false? He's trying to prove that it's true. Look at his latest post.

Saying "[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]so that we can put a nail in the coffin on height theory once and for all." and pointing out that it's only 7.5% of this forum seems to point in the direction of disbelief more than support but that's just me.[/font]

Edit: OK just saw the second post now so scrap that.
 
FeminismsCancer said:
Saying "[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]so that we can put a nail in the coffin on height theory once and for all." and pointing out that it's only 7.5% of this forum seems to point in the direction of disbelief more than support but that's just me.[/font]

You misundersood me, my intention was to confirm not disprove height theory, my original post was poorly worded.
 
fred_herbert said:
You misundersood me, my intention was to confirm not disprove height theory, my original post was poorly worded.

Yes it kinda was but I saw your other post now, like I said in the edit above.
 
FeminismsCancer said:
Saying "[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]so that we can put a nail in the coffin on height theory once and for all." and pointing out that it's only 7.5% of this forum seems to point in the direction of disbelief more than support but that's just me.[/font]

Edit: OK just saw the second post now so scrap that.

The argument is resolved, then
 
lmao, you have to be above 6’3” to be tall? do you live in the Netherlands or something?

anyway I’m 5’7” = manlet = it’s over, it never even began

even if I was handsome, I’d still be sub-8

Anybody over 6’ is a fakecel
 
MayorOfKekville said:
lmao, you have to be above 6’3” to be tall? do you live in the Netherlands or something?

anyway I’m 5’7” = manlet = it’s over, it never even began

even if I was handsome, I’d still be sub-8

Anybody over 6’ is a fakecel

I picked 6'3 as the tall category, because it is the manlet equivalent in terms of proportion:

~7% are sub 5'7 and ~7% are 6'3+
 
fred_herbert said:
I picked 6'3 as the tall category, because it is the manlet equivalent in terms of proportion:

What is that supposed to mean?

Women are universally attracted to tall men, without exception. It is impossible for a man to be “too tall”. The taller the man, the more attractive he is to women.
 
MayorOfKekville said:
What is that supposed to mean?

Women are universally attracted to tall men, without exception. It is impossible for a man to be “too tall”. The taller the man, the more attractive he is to women.

It means that there are as many people 6'3 and above as there are people 5'7 and below. If u picked 100 random people from the street, 7 would be shorter than 5'7 and 7 would be taller than 6'3.
 
MayorOfKekville said:
What is that supposed to mean?

Women are universally attracted to tall men, without exception. It is impossible for a man to be “too tall”. The taller the man, the more attractive he is to women.

He took the 7% percent from the small end, and the 7% from the tall end.


dr-problematic said:
its not like its a good enough hate still

You can never assume with some people. If I said I was 5'8, they'd call me Michael Jordan and say I'm fakecel.
 
Kointo said:
He took the 7% percent from the small end, and the 7% from the tall end.



You can never assume with some people. If I said I was 5'8, they'd call me Michael Jordan and called me a fakecel.



nah, 6ft+ is something that can be considered as a plub, below that is average standard
 
dr-problematic said:
nah, 6ft+ is something that can be considered as a plub, below that is average standard

Agreed. I'm saying that some people think 5'8 is relatively tall. I don't.
 
fred_herbert said:
It means that there are as many people 6'3 and above as there are people 5'7 and below. If u picked 100 random people from the street, 7 would be shorter than 5'7 and 7 would be taller than 6'3.

Ah ok, get it now.
 
Should have cut it up into more poll options:
-sub 5 7
-5 7 to 5 9
-5 9 to 5 11
-5 11 to 6 2
-6 2 to 6 4
-Above 6 4
 
6'4 with shoes on, and I insist that counts.
 
KV- said:
Should have cut it up into more poll options:
-sub 5 7
-5 7 to 5 9
-5 9 to 5 11
-5 11 to 6 2
-6 2 to 6 4
-Above 6 4

Yeah I think so too because now all you see is a big spike in the middle though it's already clear that the Bell curve would be skewed in favour of the shorter end compared to the general population.
 
This place will not have normal distribution. The shorter you are the harder it gets to find a mate. Incels would naturally be lower than the national average so are bell curve will be left skewed.
 
Kointo said:
5'11

My face ruins me though.

This is me.

Frame isn't much to write home about either.

And not being NT.
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
17
Views
448
underballer
U
J
Replies
10
Views
470
Antisocialloner
Antisocialloner
1TZ0VER
Replies
35
Views
626
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top