Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory How sluts and complete cucks argue on social media

svgmn1

svgmn1

Incellus Maximus
★★
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Posts
3,159
Online
25d 23h 22m
As we know, Typically when you follow a set of values or a certain way of thinking that others like you do or other mindsets, you subconsciously begin to form psychological entanglements with individuals of that group, this is a direct result of your ego and it's bias: bias to points that your ego likes, and bias against the ones that your ego doesn't.

without going much into detail on the psychological aspect of things, I have been working on recognizing a pattern that soy cucks and foid sluts (specifically) follow when arguing against others.

for example i'll show you some of the similar phrases that normies use:

yikes
sweetie you're having a mental breakdown.
why are you lashing out on everyone?
who hurt you?
you really need some help.

And many other phrases :what:

note that I am not saying that incels or other people don't have catchphrases or buzzwords to smear at the faces of normies, totally not. I am merely pointing at the normie side of things and how we all experienced similar, patternal activity when dealing with them.

I have also recognized a very unique pattern anong normies and concluded that people among them who can't debate, typically bait you to insult them by directly or indirectly mocking you. it is such a psychopathic behavior that amazes me. it starts a provoking behavior or phrase that is bound to intiate a backlash. from this point, you have two options: either to subliminally mock and deride, eventually picking the exact same route they're following, or to insult them. and despite libcucks and normies crying about ad hominem, they -unironically- seem like the most avid practitioners of such a fallacy according to my analysis. normies will have no problem attacking you based on your sex life, looks, mental state etc. and they will quickly jump to pointing out your weaknesses, instead of civil debating and conversate. while also -contradictorily- shaming you for doing the same, only in a more direct manner instead of playing mental gymnastics. based on the previous sentence, a one mighty conclusion is drawn: that there is no way to talk with normies but to insult them.

from this point and after, the upcoming respond to an insult against them (which was full knowingly prompted by them) will be met with outcries and witchhunt.
it's really a proof of work method of argument. there is no knowledge involved in this, why need knowledge in an argument you are bound to "win" anyways? in the end, the other side you're debating with will either get banned, get his post removed or witchhunted on social media.



On the social media of things, Elon Musk recently bought twitter. and despite him being a cuck, he's a cuck who provokes libcucks and they both have history. based on this I'm sure some rules will change. let's see how this will play out for these people and their internet arguments :what:
 
Last edited:
jerkjocky

jerkjocky

mentally chad
★★★★
Joined
Apr 10, 2022
Posts
1,361
Online
7d 19h 36m
yikes
sweetie you're having a mental breakdown.
why are you lashing out on everyone?
who hurt you?
you really need some help.
i think ive heard people in real life say one of these phrases like a single digit amount of times in my entire life. i think youre exaggerating how much people behave like IT users and reddit/discord soy cucks IRL.
I have also recognized a very unique pattern anong normies and concluded that people among them who can't debate, typically bait you to insult them by directly or indirectly mocking you. it is such a psychopathic behavior that amazes me. it starts a provoking behavior or phrase that is bound to intiate a backlash. from this point, you have two options: either to subliminally mock and deride, eventually picking the exact same route they're following, or to insult them. and despite libcucks and normies crying about ad hominem, they -unironically- seem like the most avid practitioners of such a fallacy according to my analysis. normies will have no problem attacking you based on your sex life, looks, mental state etc. and they will quickly jump to pointing out your weaknesses, instead of civil debating and conversate. while also -contradictorily- shaming you for doing the same, only in a more direct manner instead of playing mental gymnastics. based on the previous sentence, a one mighty conclusion is drawn: that there is no way to talk with normies but to insult them.

from this point and after, the upcoming respond to an insult against them (which was full knowingly prompted by them) will be met with outcries and witchhunt.
it's really a proof of work method of argument. there is no knowledge involved in this, why need knowledge in an argument you are bound to "win" anyways? in the end, the other side you're debating with will either get banned, get his post removed or witchhunted on social media.
this is all pure autism and socially inept retard shit. people will normally talk shit back and forth to each other. its a type of socializing. you just rip back into them. it seems like youre heavily autistic and cant understand voice inflections or social cues
 
svgmn1

svgmn1

Incellus Maximus
★★
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Posts
3,159
Online
25d 23h 22m
i think ive heard people in real life say one of these phrases like a single digit amount of times in my entire life. i think youre exaggerating how much people behave like IT users and reddit/discord soy cucks IRL.
I was strictly speaking of arguments on the internet thus there is no exaggeration to this point.

this is all pure autism and socially inept retard shit. people will normally talk shit back and forth to each other. its a type of socializing. you just rip back into them. it seems like youre heavily autistic and cant understand voice inflections or social cues
It could be that I am autistic like the majority here but I can recognize patterns. you however speak exactly like a grayfag or a foid who got touched by this which is expected and the nerve on some grayfag larpers like you fascinates me :what:
 
El Enemigo

El Enemigo

Wizard
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Posts
4,046
Online
32d 11h 56m
Normies barely know how to insult from so much soy, notice how all of their insults are never aggressive but instead try to mock you in the most passive way, a good example of this is when they call you sad :lul:

"How sad you are"
"You are so sad dude"

How is that even an insult intended to hurt?
 
svgmn1

svgmn1

Incellus Maximus
★★
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Posts
3,159
Online
25d 23h 22m
Normies barely know how to insult from so much soy, notice how all of their insults are never aggressive but instead try to mock you in the most passive way, a good example of this is when they call you sad :lul:

"How sad you are"
"You are so sad dude"

How is that even an insult intended to hurt?
maybe their shit attempts at attacking someone is what prompts one to insult them in the end :blackpill::what:
 
Mentally lost cel

Mentally lost cel

The Prince of Istanbul
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Posts
16,579
Online
59d 18h 48m
Found the incel
 
El Enemigo

El Enemigo

Wizard
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Posts
4,046
Online
32d 11h 56m
maybe their shit attempts at attacking someone is what prompts one to insult them in the end :blackpill::what:
And? Imagine insulting someone like that irl, soyest trait ever
 

Similar threads

W
Replies
14
Views
274
SupremeGentleman48
SupremeGentleman48
Currycel69_
Replies
6
Views
313
bigantennaemay1
bigantennaemay1
GOIT
Replies
8
Views
193
proudweeb
proudweeb
Currycel69_
Replies
2
Views
107
Currycel69_
Currycel69_
The Grinch
Replies
6
Views
199
The Grinch
The Grinch
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top