Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL How is this still on Wikicuckia kek

  • Thread starter Deleted member 36342
  • Start date
Deleted member 36342

Deleted member 36342

Chunghwa minkuo wansui
-
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Posts
5,679
"Differences in male and female jealousy can also be observed. While female jealousy is more likely to be inspired by emotional infidelity, male jealousy is most likely to be brought on by sexual infidelity. A clear majority of approximately 62% to 86% of women reported that they would be more bothered by emotional infidelity and 47% to 60% of men reported that they would be more bothered by sexual infidelity"
The first one is when a chad won't commit to them and the second one is when normies' whore of a wives/partners cheat on them kek

 
The results of the findings aren't offensive to women or the liberal status quo, therefore, it hasn't been deleted.
 
The results of the findings aren't offensive to women or the liberal status quo, therefore, it hasn't been deleted.
Well, is not this a simple and quick answer?
 
It's literally called "women are wonderful." :feelshaha:
Nobody cares how it's being called lmfao, it lit points that is a mass bias that takes place in society :feelshaha:
It lit points out the bluepill bs kek
 
Nobody cares how it's being called lmfao, it lit points that is a mass bias that takes place in society :feelshaha:
It lit points out the bluepill bs kek
But the bias does not say anything negative about women. At best, it's neutral. If it wasn't, you can bet that there would be some raging feminist or soy cuck writing about "revisionist science" or whatever. They've even went after math because it's "racist and sexist". JFL
 
But the bias does not say anything negative about women. At best, it's neutral. If it wasn't, you can bet that there would be some raging feminist or soy cuck writing about "revisionist science" or whatever. They've even went after math because it's "racist and sexist". JFL
Fair 'nuf:dab:
 
Wikipedia is completely partial
 
:society: we all know why
 
I don't know if I'm gonna even try to stand the sight of them,like Jesus christ the ultimate normie culture and faggotary are above the roof. :feelsUgh:
 
"Differences in male and female jealousy can also be observed. While female jealousy is more likely to be inspired by emotional infidelity, male jealousy is most likely to be brought on by sexual infidelity. A clear majority of approximately 62% to 86% of women reported that they would be more bothered by emotional infidelity and 47% to 60% of men reported that they would be more bothered by sexual infidelity"
The first one is when a chad won't commit to them and the second one is when normies' whore of a wives/partners cheat on them kek

There's a reason you can't cite wikipedia as a reliable source when studying, or refer to a wikipedia article as a valid reference. You think that's bad though, you should check the "rationalwiki", it's just a leftwashed shithole
 
Look at the trash they right about MRAs or MGTOWs

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement "There are two distinct age ranges for Men's Rights Activists: group one consists of adolescent boys aged 12-16, and group two is mainly inhabited by young adult males in the early 20s to late 30s range. The most prominent MRA media and literature consist of memes circulated on sites such as iFunny or 4chan, as well as YouTube channels run by fundamentalists or, unfortunately, New Atheists." Yeah, because men who are concerned about the fact that we are more discriminated against in current Western society (obviously im talking in first world/developed countries) than women are just sexists or a bunch of teenagers.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way "Adherents buy into the rhetoric of men's rights advocates, but instead of trying to address (alleged) issues, they have vowed either to stay away from women altogether or to stop dating/marrying women and having children.[3] In other words, it's a hilarious and terribly sad movement which quite pointlessly leaves people alienated and bitter towards an entire gender, banishing themselves to loneliness based on faulty assumptions and "problems" which could have been overcome."
Yeah, but if a woman was abused by her previous partners they'd consider her a poor victim who needs help from every possible source and is justified in hating men. Being fucked over by women in the past and then not wanting to deal with them somehow makes you a misogynist (or an incel who pretended to be with women in the past). The IQ of all the rationalwiki writers is collectively 50.

Honestly if everyone here goes ER, please try to find the rationalwiki tards and get them first.
 

Similar threads

Fire.
Replies
4
Views
279
rope infinity ♾️
rope infinity ♾️
Freixel
Replies
10
Views
324
curryboy420
curryboy420
Top Red Garnacho
Replies
37
Views
753
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
brazi
Replies
8
Views
334
brazi
brazi

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top