Women have no need to argue correctly as society is structured to give her a default 'win' button by simply becoming emotionally driven during the argument. People say that women rely on their emotions too much but the truth is that they simply resort to it in the face of an overwhelming adversary. Why do women break out in tears at the slightest provocation? It's not because she's genuinely showing an emotion, no, much like an Octopus utilising it's ink sack, a foid simply turns on the tap and she's instantly become the victim (and therefore the victor) in any situation she's in. Her reptilian mind knows that once she cries and screams any red blooded man in the vicinity will, without thinking, rush to her aid instinctively. They use this to avoid responsibility, culpability and confrontation.
They have become so entrenched in this culture that they have reached peak ego - a position where they now genuinely believe that they are near infallible which is why the bulk of their retorts are simply smug one-liners and emojis, they have been pandered to such an extent that they truly believe that doing so is an actual retort that proves their point. They have no need to dwell on the merits of an argument or even the prospect that they may be wrong as they have a line of yes-men at her disposal that would agree with any asinine thing she says.
Their minds are also wired in such a way that they believe simple underhanded tactics such as turning others against you if proof that they are correct. If you state 2+2=4 and she thinks it equals 5 then once she cannot argue any longer she'll just turn everyone against you and the core element of the argument becomes lost in a sea of contrived and fabricated drama that she uses to only boost her own ego, and during this gorging of attention she manages to convince herself that 2+2=5, and because of this she further cements in her mind that she is perfect and incapable of intellectual or factual error.
