I realized this when seeing this video start making rounds in MRA-type spaces.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1mc3wcm/we_were_raised_by_people_who_hate_us/
It's completely impossible for men to understand how much women hate them. From birth, we are led to believe that our mothers, sisters, and women in general are good people who don't want bad things to happen to us. For women, it's the exact opposite. For men, the thought that "M-M-Maybe our mommies don't like us," is basically seen as something so terrifying only someone mentally scarred would think so. Something you only think to yourself in your dark moments. Something that's supposed to shock people when you say it.
Now, compare that to how women always talk about not just their fathers, but all men. There, total dehumanization is the norm. Feminists, and women in general, hate their fathers. There's a reason why the official, oppression fantasies-based feminist version of the past, is that all before 20th century or so, all fathers were creepy freaks who always abused their daughters and only ever thought of them as sexual objects. That's how they view history. That's how they view all historical, and current, men.
And it's not just fathers. I've recently downloaded this ebook, since I think I've mentioned a few times that I've been quite curious about how the supposed female "oppression" actually looked historically when we look at the hard data between how brothers and sisters have differed in life outcomes, since that's the one area where that would actually be visible.
www.jstor.org
How do you guess they describe sibling relationships in the past? Whatever you thought, I don't think it was this.
The entire gist of that book is basically that all men are emotionless, latent sexual predators who want to rape and abuse their sisters, always have and always will. That's what that book is about when strip away all the yapping and bullshit around it. It's not even really a feminist book, it just has mostly female authorship. That's genuinely just how those female historians believe men are like. They even go out of their way to barely imply here and there that the men even felt emotions at all or bonded with their sisters at all.
Why do you think men in every society in history have made sure to make male-on-female rape one of the harshest-punished crimes, but women have never even thought that female-on-male rape is bad? Genuinely try finding a single mention of a woman anywhere in history denouncing women raping or abusing men. It doesn't exist, but the opposite we have countless examples of, and that's how they still think, they don't see men as human and have no empathy for them, no matter how close they are to them. Even if we assume the extremely shaky, oppression fantasies-based version of the past women believe in, where they supposedly had no power to force a change in laws in any way, why do we not see them even having talked about it? We have countless diaries, correspondence and so on preserved from the past, yet we have absolutely nothing showing women even contemplating that society should do anything to protect men from being abused and mistreated by women. Absolutely nothing. Has not a single woman in the past seen her male friends, fathers, brothers, sons or anything being abused by their wives, girlfriends and so on? Or have they simply not cared, because they never had, and never will have any empathy for men?
Why do you think women have never opposed wars, or only men being the ones fighting and dying in wars? Why is there absolutely no record of women anywhere in history saying that men shouldn't be dying on the battlefield, or that they should be there with them, instead being happy with the men they've grown up with risking their lives and never coming home, apart from it happening in male fantasies.
Compare this piece of fiction:
tvtropes.org
To this actual protest by women in ancient times:
Male fantasy = Women protesting to stop men risking their lives in a war
Male reality = Women go through war not giving a shit about their men dying, instead mass riot to be allowed to wear nice dresses
Why do you think absolutely no women have a problem with underage boys being kicked out of domestic violence shelters?
Or why they have no problem with feminists protesting against men having any domestic violence shelters for them at all?
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1d3tntt/30_feminist_organizations_protested_the_creation/
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cv5bwi/90_feminist_groups_and_130_womens_shelters_sign/
In fact, why does the supposed "female backlash" against extreme feminism amount to absolutely nothing at all?
Why is it that even on here, guys usually write entire paragraphs of what they've experienced to justify hating foids, while foids never do so? Could it be that it just comes to them naturally?
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1mc3wcm/we_were_raised_by_people_who_hate_us/
It's completely impossible for men to understand how much women hate them. From birth, we are led to believe that our mothers, sisters, and women in general are good people who don't want bad things to happen to us. For women, it's the exact opposite. For men, the thought that "M-M-Maybe our mommies don't like us," is basically seen as something so terrifying only someone mentally scarred would think so. Something you only think to yourself in your dark moments. Something that's supposed to shock people when you say it.
Now, compare that to how women always talk about not just their fathers, but all men. There, total dehumanization is the norm. Feminists, and women in general, hate their fathers. There's a reason why the official, oppression fantasies-based feminist version of the past, is that all before 20th century or so, all fathers were creepy freaks who always abused their daughters and only ever thought of them as sexual objects. That's how they view history. That's how they view all historical, and current, men.
And it's not just fathers. I've recently downloaded this ebook, since I think I've mentioned a few times that I've been quite curious about how the supposed female "oppression" actually looked historically when we look at the hard data between how brothers and sisters have differed in life outcomes, since that's the one area where that would actually be visible.
Sibling Relations and the Transformations of European Kinship, 1300-1900 on JSTOR
Recently considerable interest has developed about the degree to which anthropological approaches to kinship can be used for the study of the long-term developm...
www.jstor.org
How do you guess they describe sibling relationships in the past? Whatever you thought, I don't think it was this.
The entire gist of that book is basically that all men are emotionless, latent sexual predators who want to rape and abuse their sisters, always have and always will. That's what that book is about when strip away all the yapping and bullshit around it. It's not even really a feminist book, it just has mostly female authorship. That's genuinely just how those female historians believe men are like. They even go out of their way to barely imply here and there that the men even felt emotions at all or bonded with their sisters at all.
Why do you think men in every society in history have made sure to make male-on-female rape one of the harshest-punished crimes, but women have never even thought that female-on-male rape is bad? Genuinely try finding a single mention of a woman anywhere in history denouncing women raping or abusing men. It doesn't exist, but the opposite we have countless examples of, and that's how they still think, they don't see men as human and have no empathy for them, no matter how close they are to them. Even if we assume the extremely shaky, oppression fantasies-based version of the past women believe in, where they supposedly had no power to force a change in laws in any way, why do we not see them even having talked about it? We have countless diaries, correspondence and so on preserved from the past, yet we have absolutely nothing showing women even contemplating that society should do anything to protect men from being abused and mistreated by women. Absolutely nothing. Has not a single woman in the past seen her male friends, fathers, brothers, sons or anything being abused by their wives, girlfriends and so on? Or have they simply not cared, because they never had, and never will have any empathy for men?
Why do you think women have never opposed wars, or only men being the ones fighting and dying in wars? Why is there absolutely no record of women anywhere in history saying that men shouldn't be dying on the battlefield, or that they should be there with them, instead being happy with the men they've grown up with risking their lives and never coming home, apart from it happening in male fantasies.
Compare this piece of fiction:
Lysistrata - TV Tropes
As the play is Older Than Feudalism, all spoilers on this page are unmarked. A comedy by the Greek playwright Aristophanes. It is Older Than Feudalism, having first been performed in 411 BC, and (as such) is one of the oldest scripts still in use …
tvtropes.org
To this actual protest by women in ancient times:
>"rigidly patriarchal society"
>women openly demonstrating to get laws revoked
>the fucking roman empire cucks to them and removes the law
Just read this holy shit:
Lex Oppia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Male fantasy = Women protesting to stop men risking their lives in a war
Male reality = Women go through war not giving a shit about their men dying, instead mass riot to be allowed to wear nice dresses
Why do you think absolutely no women have a problem with underage boys being kicked out of domestic violence shelters?
Or why they have no problem with feminists protesting against men having any domestic violence shelters for them at all?
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1d3tntt/30_feminist_organizations_protested_the_creation/
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cv5bwi/90_feminist_groups_and_130_womens_shelters_sign/
In fact, why does the supposed "female backlash" against extreme feminism amount to absolutely nothing at all?
Why is it that even on here, guys usually write entire paragraphs of what they've experienced to justify hating foids, while foids never do so? Could it be that it just comes to them naturally
?
