M
MajorThomas666
It's all so tiresome
-
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2025
- Posts
- 2,805
- Online time
- 21h 4m
Wow cuckdit shames you for your looks and your height, and your genetics and if you don't have these immutable genetic factors, you are attacked with vitroil and turned into an laughing stock. Wow, who knew!
Yes. If the short guy on right had decent face but was still that height, everyone would still make fun of him. If the guy on right was uglier but still that height, people would console him.This is why I think short is worse than being ugly. Even outside of inkwelldom it's such a malus for everything that you do. It's a serious deficiency in ways that no other trait really is. Perhaps only muscular dystrophy, a legitimate disease, or something like it, is worse.
It's the last universal prejudice not criminalized in anyway.Everyone just thinks it’s ok to mock manlets.
Hate also how Redditors always reckon they are these massive guys. You see them comment stuff like “yeah dude im hugggee, 6’5” and 290lbs”
True, but is it a deficiency, or is it external factors that make it a deficiency?Being short is such a malus for everything that you do. It's a serious deficiency in ways that no other trait really is. Perhaps only muscular dystrophy, a legitimate disease, or something like it, is worse.
You could say the same about most of our negative traits except, maybe, low IQ. They're negative in the sense that they're undesired in the current society.True, but is it a deficiency, or is it external factors that make it a deficiency?
Being short isn't inherently bad, but be short and try to get promotion by HR or your tall CEO over tall, handsome guys, you'll be slogging in the same cubical until death.
Exactly. This is why discrimination against the short and ugly is extremely frustrating, because they are traits that wouldn't have any impact on someone's contributions or overall ability in a vacuum. It's purely because of others' biases regarding these traits that they have any impact on someone's life.True, but is it a deficiency, or is it external factors that make it a deficiency?
Being short isn't inherently bad, but be short and try to get promotion by HR or your tall CEO over tall, handsome guys, you'll be slogging in the same cubical until death.
It's an innate deficiency, like dystrophy. External factors only take advantage of it, as the strong and better have always done to the weak and worse.True, but is it a deficiency, or is it external factors that make it a deficiency?
Being short isn't inherently bad, but be short and try to get promotion by HR or your tall CEO over tall, handsome guys, you'll be slogging in the same cubical until death.
ofc they do
Only immutable traitsYou could say the same about most of our negative traits except, maybe, low IQ. They're negative in the sense that they're undesired in the current society.
No. I made a post a few weeks ago mentioning how short, ugly incels controlled the world through Catholicism before ((())), illuminates and tall Protestants infiltrated and hijacked it, preaching eugenics, racialism, dispensationalism and prosperity gospel, ending in where we are today.Form over matter, aesthetics over merit.
Was it always like this though? Or is it a product of loosening social norms?





