How did Nordics become the Master Race? What will happen when they are gone?

[RageAgainstTDL]

So I think it's pretty clear that overall the Nordics are the master race. Tallest and best looking for both genders.

Check out these chicks from Iceland:


Even the guy asking in that video is a Chad.

People from Nordic countries say Pewdiepie would be average over there:

Is there any evolutionary reason Nordics became so superior to everyone else? Why have they never exerted their physical superiority to conquer the world or spread more than they have?

Nordics are going to be damn near extinct in 2-3 generations. Is this a bad thing that humanity is losing its most physically advanced race?

 

[TheGoodGuy]

And the worst place to be short and ugly in. All of my friends are 6´1" to 6´3" and I am 5´7". And it´s torture to go for a walk in the day while seeing all these slutty girls, that is why I usually go for walk in the middle of the night which I am going to do now. It´s 12:47am in Denmark right now btw.

I sometimes envy guys who live in countries with less attractive girls like curries and such. Because being sorrounded by such beautiful girls in Scandinavia is so taunting.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

 

[slavcel]

Nordic race doesn't even exist. http://europasoberana.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-new-racial-classification-i.html - read this. What we used to refer as "Nordic" is a mixture of three racial types - White Nordid, Red Nordid and Armenid with predominance of the first ones.

 

[fOreVER]

sometimes i wish i was nordic be an english teacher somewhere in india or asian or leach off from roasties and roam across the globe planting the seeds of the gods

 

[EARTH]

They are not going "extinct" in 2 - 3 generations.

Do not confuse being outnumbered by the brown races, and extinction.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

- Results of being a hunter gatherer society for a longer time in the past.
- More meat over generations.
- Better healthcare
- social culture
- more vitamins
- less economic pressure
- better values
- health education
- resulting in less stress

It is a mix.

Copy their social standards and our children can all become chad.

 

[Lord_Starscream]

- Results of being a hunter gatherer society for a longer time in the past.
- More meat over generations.
- Better healthcare
- social culture
- more vitamins
- less economic pressure
- better values
- health education

It is a mix.

Pretty much. Not many people really consider it but Nordic countries were incredibly undeveloped before they found oil. People were living much more healthy and traditional lifestyles instead of breathing in assloads of smog and shit.

 

[slavcel]

They don't even existed. And English certainly aren't "Nordic" in the sense of old racial classification, because they tend to be brachycephalic (this feature is present due to very high level of Red Nordid ancestry) and the ideal "Nordic" type was described as a dolichocephalic person.

 

[TheNEET]

they should have done more raping in the past
Nordic men are demigods and Nordic women are angels

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Call it same nationality over generations instead of race, if you want captain obvious.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

- Results of being a hunter gatherer society for a longer time in the past.

That makes sense as the magic ingredient. Any proof or references that they were hunter gatherers for longer than the rest of the world?

I found this on the history of agriculture:

Places of Early Civilizations
Four of the earliest agrarian civilizations occurred in fertile river valleys, utilizing plants and animals that had been domesticated earlier as their foundations.

The first of these formed in Mesopotamia, the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in what is now Iraq. The valleys of these rivers had no large trees, no big stones, and no metals, but with irrigation people could grow large crops of wheat and barley, grasses that had been domesticated earlier in the mountains nearby. They also grew lentils and chickpeas and herded sheep and goats.

The next three places where agrarian civilizations emerged were in the Nile River Valley in Egypt and Nubia, the Indus River Valley in India, and the Huang He (Yellow) River Valley in China. Each river valley had its own distinctive plants and animals, which had been domesticated from the neighboring ecosystem. The Egyptians and Nubians had wheat, barley, cattle, fish, and birds. The Indus Valley people raised humped cattle and cotton, as well as wheat, barley, lentils, sheep, goats, and chickens. In China millet and wheat were grown in the north, with rice cultivated later in the south. Pigs, chickens, and soybeans also formed the staple foods in China.

https://www.khanacademy.org/partner...ties-states/a/intro-to-agrarian-civilizations

So the first 4 places we had agricultural society are now entirely full of subhumans. Middle East, North Africa, India, and China.

Are we short, weak, ugly and pathetic because our ancestors so long ago stopping having to compete physically for resources?

Seems plausible.

If so, it was not even over for us at birth. The foundation for our inferiority was laid 10,000 years ago.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

they should have done more raping in the past
Nordic men are demigods and Nordic women are angels

They did and not only that they settles everywhere on the european coasts. Even the Russians (Rus = Ruderer) are their descendants. If you do any genealogy DNA testing and are central european you probably have some viking blood.

@RageAgainstTDL no proofs but if you know about the indian, far east and european history you see he difference. The rest is just logic of natural selection.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

They did and not only that they settles everywhere on the european coasts. Even the Russians (Rus = Ruderer) are their descendants. If you do any genealogy DNA testing and are central european you probably have some viking blood.

If they had done a thousand times more raping many of us might have gotten more of their genes and been salvaged. If I had a time machine and the capacity, I would take the ancient Nordics an aircraft carrier full of modern munitions so they could properly conquer the entire globe.

We could be living in a comparative utopia had they been a more successful people.

But perhaps the exact reason they became so physically superior (hunter gatherer lifestyles and mate selection) also made them inefficient at conquering. Conquering requires a strong agricultural base. Wars are fought and won through resources, not based on how square your jaw is.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

All different times. Viking Invasion was long after hunter gatherer society.

Pretty much. Not many people really consider it but Nordic countries were incredibly undeveloped before they found oil. People were living much more healthy and traditional lifestyles instead of breathing in assloads of smog and shit.

Not only then. Still today their whole concept of life and society is different.

 

[Anger]

Water is wet

 

[Opus132]

Nordic race doesn't even exist. http://europasoberana.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-new-racial-classification-i.html - read this. What we used to refer as "Nordic" is a mixture of three racial types - White Nordid, Red Nordid and Armenid with predominance of the first ones.

That website is garbage if it's serious about its premises (will read the whole thing later). It sets up a strawman and then proceeds to present an "updated" racial classification that isn't even as extensive as the classification the racialists actually came up with:

https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-main.htm

The problem, of course, lies in the idea genetics are actually useful to determine or understand race at all. They aren't. Anymore than studying sound waves will grand you any understanding of the difference between, say, the music of Bach and that of Beethoven. It's like pretending you can understanding and grasp the meaning of a Gothic church by counting and classifying the bricks used in its construction. It is because of genetics that we get stupid garbage like the idea there is no such thing as race, because of the greater genetic differences between individuals than between individuals of different races and yadda yadda.

Also, the perceived superiority of Nordics had really nothing to do with how they looked. There was a whole slew of characteristics racialists in those days ascribed to race that genetics would be helpless to determine:

https://www.theapricity.com/earlson/reeh/index.htm

To me, the big fallacy of this conception of racial superiority is that the racialists quite clearly confused race with caste. Many of the characteristics they ascribed to the Nordic race actually pertained to the "higher" castes, chiefly the priestly caste and the warrior caste in particular, while the other races were given traits associated with the lower castes. Questions of superiority or inferiority among the races are a waste of time because it is caste that determines superiority, not race.

 

[Golden Blue]

- Results of being a hunter gatherer society for a longer time in the past.
- More meat over generations.
- Better healthcare
- social culture
- more vitamins
- less economic pressure
- better values
- health education
- resulting in less stress

It is a mix.

Copy their social standards and our children can all become chad.

If bolded was true then Australian Aborigines, Inuits, etc would be the best looking and tallest people on earth. In parts of Papua New Guinea they haven't just entered the Neolithic or discovered agriculture, do you think they are super-good looking? It doesn't matter how long your ancestors were hunting foraging, the effects of civilization are absolutely debilitating and can completely change the formation of the skull within a generation:

Scandinavians don't even descend purely from hunter-gatherers, they are(like most of Western/Central/Eastern Europe) descended from a near even mix of farmers, pastoralists and hunters.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

If bolded was true then Australian Aborigines, Inuits, etc would be the best looking and tallest people on earth. In parts of Papua New Guinea they haven't just entered the Neolithic or discovered agriculture, do you think they are super-good looking? It doesn't matter how long your ancestors were hunting foraging, the effects of civilization are absolutely debilitating and can completely change the formation of the skull within a generation:

Scandinavians don't even descend purely from hunter-gatherers, they are(like most of Western/Central/Eastern Europe) descended from a near even mix of farmers, pastoralists and hunters.

So what's the secret? Random chance or random breeding cycles? How did they become so superior while Indians and Chinese became so inferior?

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Hmm, I expected that it has to do with a more dangerous lifestyle and different nutrition. But I looked it up. You are right after iceage europeans mixed again with people from eastern steppes. I can imagine it has solely to do with meat then. I mean masai are pretty big too, for example.

 

[Golden Blue]

So what's the secret? Random chance or random breeding cycles? How did they become so superior while Indians and Chinese became so inferior?

I won't use terms like superior etc because its not objective. But Nordic looks(which are the basis for all Nordicism btw) are essentially:

1. Height - Height is the result of genetics and living standards. Modern North Euros have the best living standards in the world, one box is ticked. North Europeans descend in great part from pastoralists from the Eastern European steppe(Yamnaya culture then Corded Ware), other box ticked. Across the world, pastoralists and their descendants tend to be taller than people who follow other lifestyles. Even in Asia, nomadic Mongols and North Chinese(who have nomad blood) are taller than say South East Asians. Pastoral peoples eat more meat and drink more milk, no doubt the main reason for their height. Think Maasai.

2. Colouring - North Europeans are predominantly light eyed and light to medium haired. This gives then a distinct, shiny and aesthetic look that is uncommon or nonexistent in most of the rest of the world, simultaneously rare and appealing. Imagine if Swedes, Danes etc had the same pigmentation as say Arabs but retained everything else. Do you think Nordicism would exist? Do you think race would hold such an important place in modern history, at least among North Euros? I don't think so. However superficial pigmentation may be genetically, visually and anthropologically it is extremely important in distinguishing between groups of people.

 

[TheGoodGuy]

Isn't Denmark a caliphate yet?

Nope only young girls wearing next to nothing, not what I would call a caliphate. But there are so many muslims (ethnics) it´s so fucking annoying we are being overrun with these vermin.

 

[UndertakerCel]

There is no master race. Chad is the only master of male humans.

 

[Deleted member 60]

it's weird seeing hot girls who don't act like total bitches