Serious How come moralfags all have different definitions of morality?

[based_meme]

It really isn't, your bias is just so strong that you LITERALLY CAN'T process reality outside the framework of morality, its really sad for an incel to be so limited in their thinking, were supposed to be the ones who aren't NPC's, but you are really no different than a normie, you are just mad you are missing out on all of the fun they are, so your cope is that they will suffer for eternity afterwards

DUDE, FFS...

"The good of society" is a moral question like "the temperature of the sun" is a scientific question and like "the start date of WW2" is a historical question.

That's what they are categorically.

 

[BlkPillPres]

DUDE, FFS...

"The good of society" is a moral question like "the temperature of the sun" is a scientific question and like "the start date of WW2" is a historical question.

That's what they are categorically.

It isn't a moral question, you can only see it as a moral question because you can only view reality within the framework of morality, its that simple, it is just as easily a utilitarian question, but for you everything in life comes down to "right" and "wrong", especially because you are likely religious

If we created an artificial intelligence to pose questions and create laws of governance and develop technologies "for the good of society", would the questions that the AI pose be "moral questions"?

You'd have to be a fucking idiot to say yes, the AI would process these things as nothing more than variables and it was simply trying to come up with an optimal result

People do what is beneficial to them and those around them, because that means you are safer that way, a stable society means you personally are less likely to face any problems related to instability, it doesn't have to have anything to do with morality, but again, like I said before, and like YOU OBVIOUSLY AREN'T HONEST ENOUGH TO ADMIT TO YOURSELF:

It really isn't, your bias is just so strong that you LITERALLY CAN'T process reality outside the framework of morality

Without morality, you don't get to pat yourself on the back and feel good about your shitty life for being a "good person", so you literally can't let go of the concept, and everything you think or do is viewed through the lens of morality

Hence the term moralfag, MORALITY IS YOUR LIFE

 

[based_meme]

It isn't a moral question, you can only see it as a moral question because you can only view reality within the framework of morality, its that simple, it is just as easily a utilitarian question, but for you everything in life comes down to "right" and "wrong", especially because you are likely religious

If we created an artificial intelligence to pose questions and create laws of governance and develop technologies "for the good of society", would the questions that the AI pose be "moral questions"?

You'd have to be a fucking idiot to say yes, the AI would process these things as nothing more than variables and it was simply trying to come up with an optimal result

People do what is beneficial to them and those around them, because that means you are safer that way, a stable society means you personally are less likely to face any problems related to instability, it doesn't have to have anything to do with morality, but again, like I said before, and like YOU OBVIOUSLY AREN'T HONEST ENOUGH TO ADMIT TO YOURSELF:


Without morality, you don't get to pat yourself on the back and feel good about your shitty life for being a "good person", so you literally can't let go of the concept, and everything you think or do is viewed through the lens of morality

Hence the term moralfag, MORALITY IS YOUR LIFE

Dude, you're fucking hopeless. You're like a flat earther who walks into a physics and astronomy graduate lecture with all of the conviction in the world that the earth is indeed flat and that there's this great NASA conspiracy involving all of the scientists of the world. The lecturer patiently tries explaining to you the flaws in your reasoning, but you proudly dismiss all of it as horseshit. It soon becomes apparent that there are simpy too many gaps in the fundamentals for you to grasp the explanations.

Here you're lacking serious fundamentals in the subject to analyze and reason about morality back and forth (pretty easy when you close your mind and act like it doesn't exist KEK). In fact you haven't even defended your initial flawed arguments adequately. You've just defaulted to a variation of Godwin's law, where instead of invoking Hitler you claim the other side has to be trolling so you feel you don't need to defend your points. Your ego is too big to even admit the possibility that your flawless logic might not be so flawless, and so you've closed your mind off.

It would be easy to simply think of you as an imbecile and partition you away, but here we're about getting black pilled, and I honestly think you do care about the truth. It's like a scrawny kid on his first day in the gym trying to bench 200 pounds. You feel like you need to intervene before they do (or say in this case) something seriously stupid and hurt (embarrass) themselves.

I don't intend to change your view. That just doesn't happen, because people will believe whatever they want to believe in spite of everything. What I do hope, though, is that you grow a bit wiser and explore the subject of ethics. Prove me wrong. Prove that you're not hopeless.

 

[BlkPillPres]

people will believe whatever they want to believe in spite of everything

The irony

 

[based_meme]

The irony

Yes, you fucking tool. That applies to everyone, myself included. It's a basic aspect of human psychology. You're not special and neither am I.

JFL

 

[Homoculus]

Morality is for those who own it. Who owns it? Rich. Who's always right? Rich. And the poor is fucked.

I like your observation.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Yes, you fucking tool. That applies to everyone, myself included. It's a basic aspect of human psychology. You're not special and neither am I.

JFL

I'd argue anybody who believes in morality by default thinks they are special, because they believe there is this inherent standard of greatness that exists, and since they adhere to it in some form, that makes them "good" or "great" by proxy, that's "basic human psychology", morality is rooted in feelings of self righteousness, it revolves around ego

Its impossible to think of a standard ruleset as "good", and to also not think of yourself as better than others who don't adhere to it, when you do