That shit don't even add up.
How can the average age of first sex be 16 for girls & 17 for boys?
It adds up fine. Girls can get it whenver, and when they have daddy issues they like older men
Its probably more like 15 for girls, and 20 for boys. So many girls in my HS lost their virginity before 9th grade, and many guys lost it near the end of high school.
That's the slightest of my concerns tbh.
Why doesn't it add up?
Framecel222 said:
Boys are banging girls older than them, on average? On what planet does this occur? Girls universally lust after older boys, while boys are indifferent about age. I suspect lying on whatever data these stats are based on. Girls lie one way (exaggerate upwards) and boys lie the other (exaggerate downwards).
thetruecelibate said:
Exactly. Girls are only interested in boys a year or two older than them, at least. I remember when I went into Sixth Form, suddenly 15 year old girls were looking at me with interest.
Framecel222 said:
Because low IQ'cel
Don't treat those studies seriously. There is no legit way to measure those stats. Also an average of 16yo pretty much could mean that half of them lose their virginity at age of 13 and another half at age of 19.
LeagueEuW said:
True man. I literally presumed they had to be the same age to fuck or some shit.
The CDC website say it's 12 or 13 for girls.
existentialhack said:
lmao
hypergamy proof.
existentialhack said:
:skeptical:
I think it'll be more like 14 for girls. I'm still quite young and get shit here for it but most of the girls I know aren't virgin and like 3 guys in my year at high school get all of it.
Numbers don't add up because people are liars. Girls push it up to be good girls, and boys push it down so they're not sexless losers.
FeminismsCancer said:
Girls like status.
I don't get what you're asking.
SaintMarcLepine said:
Why is this obviously false statistic in existence. The Guardian has reported it. It's so self-evidently bullshit. Girls fuck upwards, age-wise, not down.
I've had a long day so sorry if I'm being fucking stupid but doesn't that line up? Females lose their virginities to older guys when they're younger so logically the age they lose it on average would be lower than for guys?existentialhack said:
SaintMarcLepine said:
It's the opposite. Stats say that boys lose @ 16, girls @ 17. Which is patently UNTRUE
80-20 rule retards.
It's probably like 13 for girls.
Oh, you wrote the opposite in the title. But yeah, that is obvious bullshit lmfao.existentialhack said:
C
When guys reach 17, they have sex with their 16 year old girlfriend. What doesn't add up?
Anyway, it's probably way lower than 16 for girls, because you know, girls like to lie about that stuff, even if it's anonymous.
Anyway, it's probably way lower than 16 for girls, because you know, girls like to lie about that stuff, even if it's anonymous.
everyone lies lmao
no female wants to be considered a slut, no male wants to be considered a virgin loser. end of story.
no female wants to be considered a slut, no male wants to be considered a virgin loser. end of story.
mangoboy said:
That would make the numbers even more ridiculous. If 80% of boys are unattractive and not having sex, that pushes up the average age. On top of which, girls are not fucking the top 20% of YOUNGER boys. They're fucking the top 20% of OLDER boys.
CopingGymcel said:
Sorry, I fucked up in title lol. It's the opposite. Boys lose it at 16 and girls at 17, according to surveys and shit.
more like 13 for girls and 16 for boys
false
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
