Nordicel94
Pancake-faced viking-cel
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2022
- Posts
- 1,407
Hitler's charisma and his fiery oratory power is common knowledge, but I rarely see his looks being brought up in any historical discussion.
Hitler was by no means a GigaChad but he had a masculine, sort of authoritative face that's maybe not seen as "sexy", but as "trust worthy", "solid" and "paternal".
I came to think about this when I watched a WWII documentary yesterday. I imagined Hitler's right hand men, Himmler or Goebbels becoming the Führer and I could simply not envision it. They could NEVER be the face of The Fatherland.
Remember, German foids absolutely adored Hitler.
Similarly, Che Guevara, Stalin and Castro all had these "patriarchal" faces.
Then I imagined us incels, there is ZERO CHANCE, even if we were as gifted in the art of public speaking as Hitler, that we could be successful politicians, let alone revolutionary figures trying to build new empires. No one would look at propaganda posters of us and say: "Yeah, that's our guy!".
Face = everything
Hitler was by no means a GigaChad but he had a masculine, sort of authoritative face that's maybe not seen as "sexy", but as "trust worthy", "solid" and "paternal".
I came to think about this when I watched a WWII documentary yesterday. I imagined Hitler's right hand men, Himmler or Goebbels becoming the Führer and I could simply not envision it. They could NEVER be the face of The Fatherland.
Remember, German foids absolutely adored Hitler.
Similarly, Che Guevara, Stalin and Castro all had these "patriarchal" faces.
Then I imagined us incels, there is ZERO CHANCE, even if we were as gifted in the art of public speaking as Hitler, that we could be successful politicians, let alone revolutionary figures trying to build new empires. No one would look at propaganda posters of us and say: "Yeah, that's our guy!".
Face = everything