A lot of people think that in the West, people married young before the industrial revolution but this wasn't the case. The average age of when women married from 16th century on was mid-20s.The West has been feministic and capitalistic for ages.
Meanwhile the East preserved the patriarchical society deep into 20th century before being forcibly westernized.
Read about the Hajnal line between the different marriage patterns, it's the historic border between the cucked feminist West and patriarchical East.
en.wikipedia.org
The Hajnal line is a border that links Saint Petersburg, Russia and Trieste, Italy. In 1965, John Hajnal discovered it divides Europe into two areas characterized by different levels of nuptiality. To the west of the line, marriage rates and thus fertility were comparatively low and a significant minority of women married late or remained single; to the east of the line and in the Mediterranean and select pockets of Northwestern Europe, early marriage was the norm and high fertility was countered by high mortality.
West of this line, the average age of marriage for women was 23 or more,[3] men 26, spouses were relatively close in age,[4] a substantial number of women married for the first time in their thirties and forties, and 10% to 20% of adults never married.[5][6][7] East of the line, the mean age of both sexes at marriage was earlier, spousal age disparity was greater and marriage more nearly universal.
to the west of the line, about half of all women aged 15 to 50 years of age were married while the other half were widows or spinsters; to the east of the line, about seventy percent of women in that age bracket were married while the other thirty percent were widows or nuns.
the average age at first marriage had climbed to 25 for women and 27 for men in England and the Low Countries by the end of the 16th century
The West of Hajnal line thus enabled feminism and capitalism to develop, because the greedy cucked men allowed women to marry late:
Many historians have wondered whether this unique conjugal regime might explain, in part, why capitalism first took root in Northwestern Europe, contributing to the region's relatively low mortality rates, hastening the fragmentation of the peasantry and the precocious formation of a mobile class of landless wage-earners. Others have highlighted the significance of the late marriage pattern for gender relations, for the relative strength of women's position within marriage, the "conjugal" dowry system of Northwestern Europe in which the dowry merged with the husband's wealth and would thus grow or shrink depending on circumstances (perhaps an incentive for many women to work),[29] the centrality of widows in village land inheritance, and the vitality of women's community networks.
Because of this, Western men became weak, with the ideal of manliness ultimately becoming the attractive pretty boy that women like, while in the East, masculine ogres dominate to this day.
We need to build a wall on the Hajnal line and protect the based East Slavdom from the degenerate feminist capitalist West. There is no other solution.
Meanwhile the East preserved the patriarchical society deep into 20th century before being forcibly westernized.
Read about the Hajnal line between the different marriage patterns, it's the historic border between the cucked feminist West and patriarchical East.
Western European marriage pattern - Wikipedia
The Hajnal line is a border that links Saint Petersburg, Russia and Trieste, Italy. In 1965, John Hajnal discovered it divides Europe into two areas characterized by different levels of nuptiality. To the west of the line, marriage rates and thus fertility were comparatively low and a significant minority of women married late or remained single; to the east of the line and in the Mediterranean and select pockets of Northwestern Europe, early marriage was the norm and high fertility was countered by high mortality.
West of this line, the average age of marriage for women was 23 or more,[3] men 26, spouses were relatively close in age,[4] a substantial number of women married for the first time in their thirties and forties, and 10% to 20% of adults never married.[5][6][7] East of the line, the mean age of both sexes at marriage was earlier, spousal age disparity was greater and marriage more nearly universal.
to the west of the line, about half of all women aged 15 to 50 years of age were married while the other half were widows or spinsters; to the east of the line, about seventy percent of women in that age bracket were married while the other thirty percent were widows or nuns.
the average age at first marriage had climbed to 25 for women and 27 for men in England and the Low Countries by the end of the 16th century
The West of Hajnal line thus enabled feminism and capitalism to develop, because the greedy cucked men allowed women to marry late:
Many historians have wondered whether this unique conjugal regime might explain, in part, why capitalism first took root in Northwestern Europe, contributing to the region's relatively low mortality rates, hastening the fragmentation of the peasantry and the precocious formation of a mobile class of landless wage-earners. Others have highlighted the significance of the late marriage pattern for gender relations, for the relative strength of women's position within marriage, the "conjugal" dowry system of Northwestern Europe in which the dowry merged with the husband's wealth and would thus grow or shrink depending on circumstances (perhaps an incentive for many women to work),[29] the centrality of widows in village land inheritance, and the vitality of women's community networks.
Because of this, Western men became weak, with the ideal of manliness ultimately becoming the attractive pretty boy that women like, while in the East, masculine ogres dominate to this day.
We need to build a wall on the Hajnal line and protect the based East Slavdom from the degenerate feminist capitalist West. There is no other solution.
