Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hindus in the UK are alpha

Stellar thread. Curries once again keeping it based. Ricelets and Mayo cracKKKers could only dream of such threads
 
hindus aint alpha. muslims are neither.
 
@RREEEEEEEEE vs pajeet greycels boxing match when
I will knock the fuck out of these planteating cow piss drinking red dots. :feelskek: Provided they don't storm at me with 100 of them at once and lynch me like they do every Islamic person there.
Cucked by Iranian
Cucked by Moghols
Cucked by Whites
Cucked by Arabs
Cucked by Chinks

Oldest civilization my ass.

The Sino civilization is the youngest in the world and they're the ones who are leading in technology.
Are you talking about the Indus Valley Civilization? It is indeed the oldest civilization in the world, but it existed waaaay before Dravidians did. Dravidians existed around 3000 B.C., whereas the IVC existed around 7000 B.C. ;)
 
Last edited:
I will knock the fuck out of these planteating cow piss drinking red dots. :feelskek: Provided they don't storm at me with 100 of them at once and lynch me like they do every Islamic person there.

Are you talking about the Indus Valley Civilization? It is indeed the oldest civilization in the world, but it existed waaaay before Dravidians did. Dravidians existed around 3000 B.C., whereas the IVC existed around 7000 B.C. ;)
Indus is Proto-Dravidian. Dravidians were a rape baby mixture of Iranian Farmers and Native Indian Hunter Gatherers.

In fact this Iranian Farmer ancestry even in the most isolated castes and tribes of India reaches 30-40%, while normal Indians and Pakistanis have anywhere from 50-70% of this ancestry, which meant that these Iranian farmers raped nearly all of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh indiscriminately.

The Indian Hunter Gatherer ancestry only reaches over 50% in extremely excluded groups which number something like 5,000-10,000.

The Sintashta ancestry (which we call “Aryan”) only forms around 9% to 40% at maximum in Indians, Pakistanis and Afghans. Jatts, Rors, Pashtuns have around 30-40%, while Brahmins have around 25%. Normal North Indians and Pakistanis have around 15% and it becomes negligible in the South.
FFC408F1 B1E0 4D5B 9C90 2C8593B6960A

IRN Shahr-i-Sokhta BA2 = Iranian Ancestry
RUS Sintashta MLBA = Aryan ancestry
Simulated AASI = Native Indian ancestry
CHN Shirenzighou IA = Mongoloid ancestry
 

Attachments

  • 563E3F12-ED3C-4E3A-82A3-ECF95FC9D849.png
    563E3F12-ED3C-4E3A-82A3-ECF95FC9D849.png
    473 KB · Views: 46
Last edited:
Indus is Proto-Dravidian. Dravidians were a rape baby mixture of Iranian Farmers and Native Indian Hunter Gatherers.

In fact this Iranian Farmer ancestry even in the most isolated castes and tribes of India reaches 30-40%, while normal Indians and Pakistanis have anywhere from 50-70% of this ancestry, which meant that these Iranian farmers raped nearly all of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh indiscriminately.

The Indian Hunter Gatherer ancestry only reaches over 50% in extremely excluded groups which number something like 5,000-10,000.

The Sintashta ancestry (which we call “Aryan”) only forms around 9% to 40% at maximum in Indians, Pakistanis and Afghans. Jatts, Rors, Pashtuns have around 30-40%, while Brahmins have around 25%. Normal North Indians and Pakistanis have around 15% and it becomes negligible in the South.
View attachment 280164
IRN Shahr-i-Sokhta BA2 = Iranian Ancestry
RUS Sintashta MLBA = Aryan ancestry
Simulated AASI = Native Indian ancestry
CHN Shirenzighou IA = Mongoloid ancestry
Interesting, but those Iranian farmers as you call them came later and thus calling them "Proto-Dravidian" makes little sense. Also, I doubt they were raped, the women most likely wanted to breed with the lighter-skinned men willingly. :feelshaha: Once a currywhore, always a currywhore. As it currently stands, we have NO IDEA what group consisted of the original IVC because the earliest group we can link them to IVC are the Dravidians. Finally, calling them "Indian hunter-gatherers" is incorrect. Indians and Pakistanis are new terms. Before partition, we called it Hindustan. Ask your grandfather/grandmother if they are still alive. We have no name for them because we don't know who they possibly were. All we know is that they must have been natives, because they had no contemporary civilizations, those came into existence 4000 years later.
 
Why don't you both try Jihadmaxxing, who knows you might end up with 72 plump breasted virgins
 
Why don't you both try Jihadmaxxing, who knows you might end up with 72 plump breasted virgins
Low IQ meme, frequently used by hindu dindu pajeets and odin cucks alike.
 
Interesting, but those Iranian farmers as you call them came later and thus calling them "Proto-Dravidian" makes little sense. Also, I doubt they were raped, the women most likely wanted to breed with the lighter-skinned men willingly. :feelshaha: Once a currywhore, always a currywhore. As it currently stands, we have NO IDEA what group consisted of the original IVC because the earliest group we can link them to IVC are the Dravidians. Finally, calling them "Indian hunter-gatherers" is incorrect. Indians and Pakistanis are new terms. Before partition, we called it Hindustan. Ask your grandfather/grandmother if they are still alive. We have no name for them because we don't know who they possibly were. All we know is that they must have been natives, because they had no contemporary civilizations, those came into existence 4000 years later.
Dravidian languages literally did not exist before Indus is what I’m trying to say. The Dravidian languages themselves were bought by Iranian invaders. Many scholars do suggest that the Indus language which remains in deciphered may have been Proto-Dravidian.

You could call it “the Dravidian invasion” of India.

The biggest evidence we have is the name of the Indus civilisation in Sumerian. Its called “Melukkhha”. The Sanskrit word for a Dravidian/barbarian is “Mlechha”. At the same time in Tamil, the word “Mlaccam” means “Highland Country”. Very interesting details imo you should read the Wikipedia page on Mleukkha

IMO the genetically closest people of Ancient Dravidian are the Brahui in Pakistan who are Pakistani but speak a Dravidian language. These are the unmixed ones that remained somehow while the other Proto-Dravidians left to the South where they further mixed with AASI people and bred them out.

And Iranian farmers were not very light skinned, they were brown-ish, so the resulting product would’ve looked like a dark subcontinental. Keep in mind modern Iranians have substantial Indo-European input so that’s why they are much lighter than ancient Iranians.

The Native Indian Hunter Gatherers by that I mean the AASI people. The languages of these people are extinct and even they themselves are extinct in their pure form and got bred out by Iranians farmers and Aryan nomads. The same thing happened to Hunter Gatherers in Europe getting bred out by Yamnaya R1b Chads.

Brutal tbh

@ryhan you May be interested in my post above and the one before I posted with infographs
 
Last edited:
Those Pakistani faggots are scum too. Fuck em.



White nationalists will cherry pick certain events to justify the same anti islam diatribe that all muslims are rapists the stats though are quite clear most muslims are peaceful but i still disagree with them reilgiously and i want answers no is answering them
Indus is Proto-Dravidian. Dravidians were a rape baby mixture of Iranian Farmers and Native Indian Hunter Gatherers.

In fact this Iranian Farmer ancestry even in the most isolated castes and tribes of India reaches 30-40%, while normal Indians and Pakistanis have anywhere from 50-70% of this ancestry, which meant that these Iranian farmers raped nearly all of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh indiscriminately.

The Indian Hunter Gatherer ancestry only reaches over 50% in extremely excluded groups which number something like 5,000-10,000.

The Sintashta ancestry (which we call “Aryan”) only forms around 9% to 40% at maximum in Indians, Pakistanis and Afghans. Jatts, Rors, Pashtuns have around 30-40%, while Brahmins have around 25%. Normal North Indians and Pakistanis have around 15% and it becomes negligible in the South.
View attachment 280164
IRN Shahr-i-Sokhta BA2 = Iranian Ancestry
RUS Sintashta MLBA = Aryan ancestry
Simulated AASI = Native Indian ancestry
CHN Shirenzighou IA = Mongoloid ancestry



This is a gold mine its solving so much confusions keep it up it's honestly a heavenly find
 
Last edited:
The fact that they are "Tamil" curries. The most cucked race of people on this planet.
Why do you hate tamils jfl the highest iq curries
Dravidian languages literally did not exist before Indus is what I’m trying to say. The Dravidian languages themselves were bought by Iranian invaders. Many scholars do suggest that the Indus language which remains in deciphered may have been Proto-Dravidian.

You could call it “the Dravidian invasion” of India.

The biggest evidence we have is the name of the Indus civilisation in Sumerian. Its called “Melukkhha”. The Sanskrit word for a Dravidian/barbarian is “Mlechha”. At the same time in Tamil, the word “Mlaccam” means “Highland Country”. Very interesting details imo you should read the Wikipedia page on Mleukkha

IMO the genetically closest people of Ancient Dravidian are the Brahui in Pakistan who are Pakistani but speak a Dravidian language. These are the unmixed ones that remained somehow while the other Proto-Dravidians left to the South where they further mixed with AASI people and bred them out.

And Iranian farmers were not very light skinned, they were brown-ish, so the resulting product would’ve looked like a dark subcontinental. Keep in mind modern Iranians have substantial Indo-European input so that’s why they are much lighter than ancient Iranians.

The Native Indian Hunter Gatherers by that I mean the AASI people. The languages of these people are extinct and even they themselves are extinct in their pure form and got bred out by Iranians farmers and Aryan nomads. The same thing happened to Hunter Gatherers in Europe getting bred out by Yamnaya R1b Chads.

Brutal tbh

@ryhan you May be interested in my post above and the one before I posted with infographs
very intresting us dravidian tamils wuz iranians and shieet
 
Last edited:
There's actually quite a lot of truth in this tbh. The currycel stereotype doesn't exist here and we have a LOT of curries.
 
Hm
 

Attachments

  • B2A0AA6A-BC01-47E7-B899-B6D3C3819770.jpeg
    B2A0AA6A-BC01-47E7-B899-B6D3C3819770.jpeg
    50.1 KB · Views: 15
curry = high T and psychopathic af
 
Why do you hate tamils jfl the highest iq curries

very intresting us dravidian tamils wuz iranians and shieet
I do not hate them per se and you are right they are the highest iq curries. But they are the last bunch of cirries I would associate with the word "alpha"
 
Don't let this thread die. Keep bumping it every other day. I'm loving this religion war here.
@pp183 this gon be gud
 
I do not hate them per se and you are right they are the highest iq curries. But they are the last bunch of cirries I would associate with the word "alpha"
Tbh im half Tamil luckily that side isn't cucked but I know many Tamil's that are straight boot lickers
 
I do not hate them per se and you are right they are the highest iq curries. But they are the last bunch of cirries I would associate with the word "alpha"
Low class sri lankan tamils like in that vid are very fucked up
Tbh im half Tamil luckily that side isn't cucked but I know many Tamil's that are straight boot lickers
tamils need to niggermax
 

Similar threads

Revenge cell
Replies
10
Views
526
Emba
Emba
fukurou
Replies
0
Views
324
fukurou
fukurou
user
Replies
1
Views
402
syrroz1986
syrroz1986
SlayerSlayer
Replies
83
Views
4K
DreamCoper
DreamCoper

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top