Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Here's why women are dumber

emotionalpepe

emotionalpepe

Greycel
Joined
Sep 29, 2023
Posts
51
If we lived in a reality where women were attracted to people for their personalities, then the smartest guys would get the most love. How often do we see that that's never the case?

Look, I don't like speaking in absolutes and making broad generalisations because I prefer being objective, but the probabilities of a woman being attracted to a man for his intelligence is so low that it almost never happens. In the rare case scenarios it happens because the man has acquired fame or wealth due to his intelligence. Because if it was the other way around the portrayal and the focus of attraction in novels and romantic movies would be intelligence and not good looks.
Here's what I'm trying to get at.

Women are very look-oriented, to the point of idolising and worshipping what they deem attractive. See, intelligence just like an expensive watch on a guy who's not attractive is just like anything else that he has on his body. Unattractive.
People often fail to grasp the differentiation. It's not that smoking is attractive, attractive people smoking is attractive.
It's the false associations that ruin our psyche. And the so called "system" feeds off of those false associations or creates them for state benefits.

People associate with what they find most relatable. People associate with attractive people smoking and then start smoking, therefore, people relate to feeling attractive or somewhat attractive. More often than not, it's a result of systematic brainwashing, very deliberate paths in the methodologies of upbringing in children. Which often points at a la-la land where everyone is accepted and where everyone's needs are met and where the world is a fairy tale and you know the drill.

Attractiveness plays a role in this scenario. Being attracted does too. In a way, people mimic those whom they find attractive and start associating with their behaviour. The collective bisexual subconscious mind is what this is based upon.
When it comes to women however, they associate with attractiveness the most out of everything, attractiveness on a physical sense.

See, if you observe women and their behaviour, you can see a clear pathology where they are borderline or maybe literally obsessed with their bodies. Women for one reason or other are incapable of critical thought and intelligent, rational self-reflection. It is because of this inability that they judge whom they find attractive on a scale of physical attractiveness.
Thus they are unable to relate to intelligent men due to lack of first-hand experience. Men don't have this problem because men have felt intelligent before, and it wasn't pretending for the sake of attention. Therefore, men find intelligence in women attractive, not only in attractive women who display such a virtue of high intelligence, but also nerds who wear glasses and whose faces are full of pimples.
The same cannot be said about women as reasons stated earlier. Women are solely basing their attraction on facial symmetry, skin colour, eye colour strictly and tall height. They are unable to see the bigger picture, their programming only allows them to see as far as it can take them.

This disproportionate hierarchy of mental clarity is also stated in religious text like the Qur'an for example where it clearly states that a man is above a woman in terms of intelligence and that a woman's testament is half that of a man's. The antics were able to see through women's physical beauty and into their psyche and they found a void.
 
@Fat Link put that on Must Read
 
Women aren't attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to things which being intelligent could [potentially] bring ( like fame, money, status, good job etc ).
Thinking that women are attracted to intelligence is like thinking that people are attracted to money because of paper and design instead of value that money has.
 
High IQ thread
 
Very interesting thread, OP
 
Women aren't attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to things which being intelligent could [potentially] bring ( like fame, money, status, good job etc ).
Thinking that women are attracted to intelligence is like thinking that people are attracted to money because of paper and design instead of value that money has.
:feelsthink:
 
If we lived in a reality where women were attracted to people for their personalities, then the smartest guys would get the most love. How often do we see that that's never the case?

Look, I don't like speaking in absolutes and making broad generalisations because I prefer being objective, but the probabilities of a woman being attracted to a man for his intelligence is so low that it almost never happens. In the rare case scenarios it happens because the man has acquired fame or wealth due to his intelligence. Because if it was the other way around the portrayal and the focus of attraction in novels and romantic movies would be intelligence and not good looks.
Here's what I'm trying to get at.

Women are very look-oriented, to the point of idolising and worshipping what they deem attractive. See, intelligence just like an expensive watch on a guy who's not attractive is just like anything else that he has on his body. Unattractive.
People often fail to grasp the differentiation. It's not that smoking is attractive, attractive people smoking is attractive.
It's the false associations that ruin our psyche. And the so called "system" feeds off of those false associations or creates them for state benefits.

People associate with what they find most relatable. People associate with attractive people smoking and then start smoking, therefore, people relate to feeling attractive or somewhat attractive. More often than not, it's a result of systematic brainwashing, very deliberate paths in the methodologies of upbringing in children. Which often points at a la-la land where everyone is accepted and where everyone's needs are met and where the world is a fairy tale and you know the drill.

Attractiveness plays a role in this scenario. Being attracted does too. In a way, people mimic those whom they find attractive and start associating with their behaviour. The collective bisexual subconscious mind is what this is based upon.
When it comes to women however, they associate with attractiveness the most out of everything, attractiveness on a physical sense.

See, if you observe women and their behaviour, you can see a clear pathology where they are borderline or maybe literally obsessed with their bodies. Women for one reason or other are incapable of critical thought and intelligent, rational self-reflection. It is because of this inability that they judge whom they find attractive on a scale of physical attractiveness.
Thus they are unable to relate to intelligent men due to lack of first-hand experience. Men don't have this problem because men have felt intelligent before, and it wasn't pretending for the sake of attention. Therefore, men find intelligence in women attractive, not only in attractive women who display such a virtue of high intelligence, but also nerds who wear glasses and whose faces are full of pimples.
The same cannot be said about women as reasons stated earlier. Women are solely basing their attraction on facial symmetry, skin colour, eye colour strictly and tall height. They are unable to see the bigger picture, their programming only allows them to see as far as it can take them.

This disproportionate hierarchy of mental clarity is also stated in religious text like the Qur'an for example where it clearly states that a man is above a woman in terms of intelligence and that a woman's testament is half that of a man's. The antics were able to see through women's physical beauty and into their psyche and they found a void.
FOIDS ARE FUCKING JUST WET HOLES FOR CHAD TO PUMP AND DUMP IM FED UP I JUST WANT A STRETCHED HOLE TO CUM INSIDE OF ONE OF THESE WHORE GOD DAMN IT WITHOUT PAYING $300 wtf
 
because they just are
 
as if foids are intelligent enough to even recognize a man's intelligence
 
Women aren't attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to things which being intelligent could [potentially] bring ( like fame, money, status, good job etc ).
Thinking that women are attracted to intelligence is like thinking that people are attracted to money because of paper and design instead of value that money has.
I agree but 100iq chad mogs 90iq chad to non ethnic women tbh
 
Women aren't attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to things which being intelligent could [potentially] bring ( like fame, money, status, good job etc ).
Thinking that women are attracted to intelligence is like thinking that people are attracted to money because of paper and design instead of value that money has.
Very true
 
What about the modern IQ test stats? It could be a kike propaganda, but I still have an open mind about it. I believe men are just screwed from birth not just in looks, but status, intelligence, and access to foids (more men than foids born).
 
What about the modern IQ test stats? It could be a kike propaganda, but I still have an open mind about it. I believe men are just screwed from birth not just in looks, but status, intelligence, and access to foids (more men than foids born).
Foids are just naturally dumb cunts don’t fucking blam Jews for this you antisemetic piece of garbage!
 
Good thread, but intelligence is a huge cope. On its own it means nothing and makes you prone to depression. For intelligence to be worth anything you need other traits, like discipline, commitment, good looks, organization, responsibility, which are already worthwhile on their own.
 
Definitely, brother.

Foid whores scratch their heads trying to figure out how to fit the square peg into the circle hole, regardless. Not a surprise they get exposed as being even more retarded.
 
62052.jpg
 
Good thread, but intelligence is a huge cope. On its own it means nothing and makes you prone to depression. For intelligence to be worth anything you need other traits, like discipline, commitment, good looks, organization, responsibility, which are already worthwhile on their own.
Except for good looks, these traits can only be harnessed if you're rewarded properly. Someone born with such traits would be quick to give up on them if they were not rewarded for their work.
 
If we lived in a reality where women were attracted to people for their personalities, then the smartest guys would get the most love. How often do we see that that's never the case?

Look, I don't like speaking in absolutes and making broad generalisations because I prefer being objective, but the probabilities of a woman being attracted to a man for his intelligence is so low that it almost never happens. In the rare case scenarios it happens because the man has acquired fame or wealth due to his intelligence. Because if it was the other way around the portrayal and the focus of attraction in novels and romantic movies would be intelligence and not good looks.
Here's what I'm trying to get at.

Women are very look-oriented, to the point of idolising and worshipping what they deem attractive. See, intelligence just like an expensive watch on a guy who's not attractive is just like anything else that he has on his body. Unattractive.
People often fail to grasp the differentiation. It's not that smoking is attractive, attractive people smoking is attractive.
It's the false associations that ruin our psyche. And the so called "system" feeds off of those false associations or creates them for state benefits.

People associate with what they find most relatable. People associate with attractive people smoking and then start smoking, therefore, people relate to feeling attractive or somewhat attractive. More often than not, it's a result of systematic brainwashing, very deliberate paths in the methodologies of upbringing in children. Which often points at a la-la land where everyone is accepted and where everyone's needs are met and where the world is a fairy tale and you know the drill.

Attractiveness plays a role in this scenario. Being attracted does too. In a way, people mimic those whom they find attractive and start associating with their behaviour. The collective bisexual subconscious mind is what this is based upon.
When it comes to women however, they associate with attractiveness the most out of everything, attractiveness on a physical sense.

See, if you observe women and their behaviour, you can see a clear pathology where they are borderline or maybe literally obsessed with their bodies. Women for one reason or other are incapable of critical thought and intelligent, rational self-reflection. It is because of this inability that they judge whom they find attractive on a scale of physical attractiveness.
Thus they are unable to relate to intelligent men due to lack of first-hand experience. Men don't have this problem because men have felt intelligent before, and it wasn't pretending for the sake of attention. Therefore, men find intelligence in women attractive, not only in attractive women who display such a virtue of high intelligence, but also nerds who wear glasses and whose faces are full of pimples.
The same cannot be said about women as reasons stated earlier. Women are solely basing their attraction on facial symmetry, skin colour, eye colour strictly and tall height. They are unable to see the bigger picture, their programming only allows them to see as far as it can take them.

This disproportionate hierarchy of mental clarity is also stated in religious text like the Qur'an for example where it clearly states that a man is above a woman in terms of intelligence and that a woman's testament is half that of a man's. The antics were able to see through women's physical beauty and into their psyche and they found a void.
Women are objects, sexual objects. They can't survive without men. Even their lowest act "selling their bodies" revolves around men. Our ancestors knew this. Women's liberation was the biggest mistake ever. Deep down it's all a big business and the scope is depopulation.

It's over.
 
Except for good looks, these traits can only be harnessed if you're rewarded properly. Someone born with such traits would be quick to give up on them if they were not rewarded for their work.
Good point. And what's the most reliable way to be rewarded, or receive positive feedback?

Being good looking.
 
Good personality doesnt mean smart lol
 
Bro, you really don't need the sermon.

They have smaller brains. That's it. Case closed.
 
I agree but 100iq chad mogs 90iq chad to non ethnic women tbh
Says who? If anything it's the opposite. The 90iq Chad is probably gonna be more forward and aggressive and that's catnip to women of all races.
 
Says who? If anything it's the opposite. The 90iq Chad is probably gonna be more forward and aggressive and that's catnip to women of all races.
90 is for short term relationships. 100 is for long term.
 
90 is for short term relationships. 100 is for long term.
Again who says? Are you secretly a woman and am talking through your own experience? Also do you really think a normal white women (or any women) would be able to tell the difference between a 100iq vs a 90iq guy?
 
Women are a cancer on this planet. KICK A FOID IN HER STINKY PUSSY TODAY
 
Anything a good looking person does is always seen in a positive light or good light.

People always say that women are more detailed-orientated and analytical, but I would say it's the opposite, and that men carry more of those traits. A lot of the stuff that women like are just surface-level and at least men, and appreciate for what things are more deeply. Which is part of why men that are hobbyists are usually knee-deep in it and also men tend to be more autistic than women as well.
 
Women aren't attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to things which being intelligent could [potentially] bring ( like fame, money, status, good job etc ).
Thinking that women are attracted to intelligence is like thinking that people are attracted to money because of paper and design instead of value that money has.
Came to say this
 
Anything a good looking person does is always seen in a positive light or good light.

People always say that women are more detailed-orientated and analytical, but I would say it's the opposite, and that men carry more of those traits. A lot of the stuff that women like are just surface-level and at least men, and appreciate for what things are more deeply. Which is part of why men that are hobbyists are usually knee-deep in it and also men tend to be more autistic than women as well.
When anyone says that women are more detail oriented, if you pick their brains a bit more you will learn that they are basing their claims on the following:
A) How much attention and time they spend dressing themselves up
B) Decorating a house or another physical object

If pay close attention, you will see the underlying mutuality - women are obsessed only with visual attractiveness because that's all they can perceive and all that they can offer. Imagine a woman that can't properly decorate herself, home or car? With what else would she capture your attention? (Assuming you were playing the role of a chad or another foid ofc, they dont care about capturing our attention lmfao)
 
"People often fail to grasp the differentiation. It's not that smoking is attractive, attractive people smoking is attractive".

That's such a simple but completely important way of looking at things, I like that one, that's mine now.
 
Deserved the pin
The attention to detail is usually related to the exterior and not the underlying reason
 
Deserved the pin
The attention to detail is usually related to the exterior and not the underlying reason
 
Deserved the pin
The attention to detail is usually related to the exterior and not the underlying reason
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
54
Views
761
Mistake
Mistake
Stupid Clown
Replies
5
Views
174
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
godleftmeunfinished
RageFuel I hate fat women
Replies
22
Views
480
chainmail
chainmail
Balding Subhuman
Replies
20
Views
641
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
Rabbi Schneerson
Replies
3
Views
149
Limitcel
Limitcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top