Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal [Heightpill]Socio‐Economic Position and Height in Early Adulthood

DarkStar

DarkStar

Incel Powerϟϟ
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
8,461


A representative probability sample of Australian households (part of the 1995 National Health Survey). Data were collected by face‐to‐face interviews. Socio‐economic position was measured using occupation and family income. Participants comprised 9,577 Australian‐born males and females aged 20–24 (n=3,186), 25–29 (n=3,184), and 30–34 (n=3,207). Height was self‐reported and operationalised in terms of mean height and 'short’ stature (defined as 1 SD below mean height for each sex‐age subgroup).
I wonder why Redditors often go on a tangent and claim your studies are from a "small pool" or "biased" when this was from almost 10k people?:waitwhat:

Graded, positive associations were found between occupation, family income, and height for males and females in each age cohort. Among males, mean height differences between blue‐collar employees and professionals were 1.1 cm to 1.5 cm (depending on age‐cohort), and for females, 1.6 cm to 2.1 cm.
Another fat-L for ":soy:: Correlation doesn't equal causation" tards when the writing is on the fucking wall.

The corresponding height differences for males and females living in the least and most affluent families were 1.6 cm to 2.3 cm, and 1.0 cm to 2.5 cm, respectively.
This is more interesting, since it hinges into familial status, which ofc we all can agree is to a degree heritable.

Matches up with a lot of what we see irl; by being tall you're just more likely to be born with a good face.

In my HS, the clique of popular, good looking kids from well-off families had a higher proportion of tallfags than other groups- coincidence? :feelsjuice:

Estimates of mortality risk associated with short stature suggest that these height differences translate to about a 2–5% increased risk of death for the most disadvantaged groups Given that socio‐economic height differences in adulthood have their genesis in the formative stages of biological and social development, public health intervention efforts need to focus on early life exposures and environments.
So much for the ":soy::foidSoy::Short people live longer!" copers.
The greatest reduction in height inequalities, and by extension health inequalities, is likely to flow from macro‐level public policies to alleviate poverty and minimise the social and economic divide.
Ah, good ole' "socio-economic" factors which as established, already hinge on looks, NTness, and thus genes. :society:

Scientists estimate that about 80 percent of an individual’s height is determined by the DNA sequence variations they have inherited, but which genes these changes are in and what they do to affect height are only partially understood.
We estimated that the heritability of height in our sample was 46%.
 
#BanAllTallfags2028
 
Normies and foidaloids love pretending that social advantages just magically happen, but this is more proof showing that tall = rich = successful = more likely to have good genes. It’s a cycle, and if you’re born short or ugly, you’re just permanently outside the loop.
 
total tallfag death
 



I wonder why Redditors often go on a tangent and claim your studies are from a "small pool" or "biased" when this was from almost 10k people?:waitwhat:


Another fat-L for ":soy:: Correlation doesn't equal causation" tards when the writing is on the fucking wall.


This is more interesting, since it hinges into familial status, which ofc we all can agree is to a degree heritable.

Matches up with a lot of what we see irl; by being tall you're just more likely to be born with a good face.

In my HS, the clique of popular, good looking kids from well-off families had a higher proportion of tallfags than other groups- coincidence? :feelsjuice:


So much for the ":soy::foidSoy::Short people live longer!" copers.

Ah, good ole' "socio-economic" factors which as established, already hinge on looks, NTness, and thus genes. :society:



Is there literally ANYTHING good about being short? For fuck's sake, even being black/brown-skinned at least gives you sun resistance or whatever the fuck, but being short has absolutley ZERO advantages in any way.
 
Is there literally ANYTHING good about being short? For fuck's sake, even being black/brown-skinned at least gives you sun resistance or whatever the fuck, but being short has absolutley ZERO advantages in any way.
Easier to fit in tight spaces. Perhaps you could be a tunnel rat in the next world war.
 
CHOP ALL TALLFAG LEGS NOW. :reeeeee::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:
 
Normies and foidaloids love pretending that social advantages just magically happen, but this is more proof showing that tall = rich = successful = more likely to have good genes. It’s a cycle, and if you’re born short or ugly, you’re just permanently outside the loop.
Normies always use the "muh correlation dont' equal causation" shit, when in reality all it means is you need to look close & at a bigger picture. :feelsthink:
Is there literally ANYTHING good about being short? For fuck's sake, even being black/brown-skinned at least gives you sun resistance or whatever the fuck, but being short has absolutley ZERO advantages in any way.
Easier to fit in tight spaces. Perhaps you could be a tunnel rat in the next world war.
Retarded take

Being below average in height or even just average is objectively shit & offers no benefits
 

Similar threads

Eremetic
Replies
5
Views
293
JKlancecaster069
JKlancecaster069
Leonardo Part V
Replies
23
Views
268
Leonardo Part V
Leonardo Part V
Nullified
Replies
54
Views
1K
Nullified
Nullified
XtremeMax
Replies
46
Views
464
NIGGER BOJANGLES
NIGGER BOJANGLES

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top