Discussion height or face?

[AdolfRizzler]

i now start to belive that a foid will chose height over the face, face is important for them to look at, but their real nature is still of the sadist,masochist, psychopats, so give a 4ft guy chad face, the foids will still choose the taller, uglier dude, a good example is adriana lima who chose the 6'9 ugly dude, while she was the most beautiful model, giving birth to uglier kids than her, passing to them worse genetic that she had!
Face is important, if they have like 5'9, i think they will choose the shorter chad, than the taller uglier at face!
But I think it s because of their real nature of psychopths, sadists, masochists who wants to be dominated and beaten by something more dominant than her!
Thus dominating her, u feed their real nature, that s why they watch the most gore porn, rape, gangrape and this weird stuff!
U won t find in these porn they watch only chad face, but u will see they r tall, good frame, who are brutal with them, dominant more like an animal than a human to them, so i believe this proves that height is better than a short chad face!
What do u think?

 

[lnceI]

depends

 

[Wrath]

both

 

[Grodd]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

 

[zd60]

both are important imo

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Both hold significant importance.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Both hold significant importance.

I know that both hold importance, but an exemple if they had to choose just between these two: a chadlet and an taller uglier dude, who would they choose the chadlet who is short, or the taller dude!
By knowing their real nature, i would think the taller so that they could feed their evil nature!

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

I know that both hold importance, but an exemple if they had to choose just between these two: a chadlet and an taller uglier dude, who would they choose the chadlet who is short, or the taller dude!
By knowing their real nature, i would think the taller so that they could feed their evil nature!

I think face is slightly more important, but height can be a big factor depending on context. If the chadlet is like 5’6 and the ugly guy is 6’3, a good chunk of girls might go tall just because of height.

 

[Skoga]

As someone who suffers in both regions, height is more important

 

[AdolfRizzler]

I think face is slightly more important, but height can be a big factor depending on context. If the chadlet is like 5’6 and the ugly guy is 6’3, a good chunk of girls might go tall just because of height.

Yeah, ur probably right!

 

[laanda]

I know that both hold importance, but an exemple if they had to choose just between these two: a chadlet and an taller uglier dude, who would they choose the chadlet who is short, or the taller dude!
By knowing their real nature, i would think the taller so that they could feed their evil nature!

what you have to accept is that you want a direct answer and are against accepting a more complicated one. people are like that in this age. if you won't accept a 'its not that simple' then quite frankly, you will just be wrong. it's fine to ask this hypothetical, but don't form a belief from it, because it's rare.

The difference in which matters more is in how the two interact with one another.

proper ugly can't be fixed by being 6'3, but bad height can be fixed by chad face. That doesn't mean face > height because almost always, its about manlet 5/10 face vs moderately ugly but tall, and they're equal. being tall is much more common than having a chad face. it is a more complicated answer, there is no 'x > y', they're equal but one is 'more independant'. Technically that means face matters more, but if you go into almost any case of two incels, it doesn't matter at all.

if you want to be correct, you have to accept an answer that is literally one step above a 1 second mental process, but in my experience people are unbelievably stubborn against doing so, even though it doesn't really cost them much to understand. they just want 'x > y' and will reject anything else.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

what you have to accept is that you want a direct answer and are against accepting a more complicated one. people are like that in this age. if you won't accept a 'its not that simple' then quite frankly, you will just be wrong. it's fine to ask this hypothetical, but don't form a belief from it, because it's rare.

The difference in which matters more is in how the two interact with one another.

proper ugly can't be fixed by being 6'3, but bad height can be fixed by chad face. That doesn't mean face > height because almost always, its about manlet 5/10 face vs moderately ugly but tall, and they're equal. being tall is much more common than having a chad face. it is a more complicated answer, there is no 'x > y', they're equal but one is 'more independant'. Technically that means face matters more, but if you go into almost any case of two incels, it doesn't matter at all.

if you want to be correct, you have to accept an answer that is literally one step above a 1 second mental process, but in my experience people are unbelievably stubborn against doing so, even though it doesn't really cost them much to understand. they just want 'x > y' and will reject anything else.

oh, ok, thanks!

 

[PersonalityChad]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

Yeah i sort of agree, i'd say that as long as you're taller than the average woman in your area face is more important

 

[allah]

Face

 

[allah]

Face

It depends on height tho

 

[allah]

Sub 5'9-5'8 with a good face won't save you

 

[allah]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

 

[jartiyer1]

Both are close in importance but the face is a little more important

 

[Rapistcel]

i now start to belive that a foid will chose height over the face, face is important for them to look at, but their real nature is still of the sadist,masochist, psychopats, so give a 4ft guy chad face, the foids will still choose the taller, uglier dude, a good example is adriana lima who chose the 6'9 ugly dude, while she was the most beautiful model, giving birth to uglier kids than her, passing to them worse genetic that she had!
Face is important, if they have like 5'9, i think they will choose the shorter chad, than the taller uglier at face!
But I think it s because of their real nature of psychopths, sadists, masochists who wants to be dominated and beaten by something more dominant than her!
Thus dominating her, u feed their real nature, that s why they watch the most gore porn, rape, gangrape and this weird stuff!
U won t find in these porn they watch only chad face, but u will see they r tall, good frame, who are brutal with them, dominant more like an animal than a human to them, so i believe this proves that height is better than a short chad face!
What do u think?

Face

 

[JewProducER]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

Both matter

 

[InvoluntaryChigga]

i now start to belive that a foid will chose height over the face, face is important for them to look at, but their real nature is still of the sadist,masochist, psychopats, so give a 4ft guy chad face, the foids will still choose the taller, uglier dude, a good example is adriana lima who chose the 6'9 ugly dude, while she was the most beautiful model, giving birth to uglier kids than her, passing to them worse genetic that she had!
Face is important, if they have like 5'9, i think they will choose the shorter chad, than the taller uglier at face!
But I think it s because of their real nature of psychopths, sadists, masochists who wants to be dominated and beaten by something more dominant than her!
Thus dominating her, u feed their real nature, that s why they watch the most gore porn, rape, gangrape and this weird stuff!
U won t find in these porn they watch only chad face, but u will see they r tall, good frame, who are brutal with them, dominant more like an animal than a human to them, so i believe this proves that height is better than a short chad face!
What do u think?

Height always

 

[MattTheFramecel]

I believe face but below certain height it’s competely over even for those with chad features

 

[Guatemalancel]

face always but the issue is some of you take differences like 6'4 sub5 or 4'0 chad of course that's too huge of a difference if you took something like 5'8 real chad or even htn and 5'10 sub5 it's over for the sub5 I've personally seen it then again it depends on your location and country and if you live in a small city or not and if you're in school, college or not since I heard people saying that below 5'9 5'8 it's over even if you're chad to me atleast where I live that seems like complete nonsense I think even for normies here atleast to our level at this height but that might be the case if you live in some big city in the USA where the average height for men is 6'0 or 6'2 in that case I compared my height to all people in class and using mine It is clear that the height average in this kinda rural town in europe when I was in high school this year is noticeably lower than for example a big city in the north of this country where if you go there it's not rate to get heightmogged even by women and the further north and east you go the worst it gets I think I once got heightmogged by a girl who was not even 14 at most the one time I went to germany and that made me cope I no longer care It was over a year ago if not more and It might even be the weird shape of the street that caused that or my lack of sleep but I was already blackpilled at the time and I remember It was kind of made me cope for a moment there and made me realize the height differences are crazy in between places

 

[NDManlet173]

what you have to accept is that you want a direct answer and are against accepting a more complicated one. people are like that in this age. if you won't accept a 'its not that simple' then quite frankly, you will just be wrong. it's fine to ask this hypothetical, but don't form a belief from it, because it's rare.

The difference in which matters more is in how the two interact with one another.

proper ugly can't be fixed by being 6'3, but bad height can be fixed by chad face. That doesn't mean face > height because almost always, its about manlet 5/10 face vs moderately ugly but tall, and they're equal. being tall is much more common than having a chad face. it is a more complicated answer, there is no 'x > y', they're equal but one is 'more independant'. Technically that means face matters more, but if you go into almost any case of two incels, it doesn't matter at all.

if you want to be correct, you have to accept an answer that is literally one step above a 1 second mental process, but in my experience people are unbelievably stubborn against doing so, even though it doesn't really cost them much to understand. they just want 'x > y' and will reject anything else.

Low iq mindset

Face IS more important than voice.

You can crunch the numbers and imagine every percentile combination and with a high enough iq you can reach an answer for which is more important

And the answer is face

 

[laanda]

Low iq mindset

Face IS more important than voice.

You can crunch the numbers and imagine every percentile combination and with a high enough iq you can reach an answer for which is more important

And the answer is face

he said height retard not voice

 

[laanda]

Low iq mindset

Face IS more important than voice.

he said height retard not voice

on which you have a much stronger opinion than i do v

5'5"/165 - 5'7"/170: Turbomanlet, bottom10%
The smv difference between this height and average height is a similar difference between a bottom 15% and top15% face

you're here talking about what's low iq high iq, at least learn to fucking read first

 

[NDManlet173]

on which you have a much stronger opinion than i do v



you're here talking about what's low iq high iq, at least learn to fucking read first

Maybe if you read what i said you'd realise i said face is more important than voice as an example that even though it's complicated at the end of the day one is clearly better

I was referring to the height vs face arguement in the other 2 paragraphs

 

[laanda]

Maybe if you read what i said you'd realise i said face is more important than voice as an example that even though it's complicated at the end of the day one is clearly better

I was referring to the height vs face arguement in the other 2 paragraphs

you didn't make that clear at all you just blindly said 'face IS more important than voice'. it was your first line.

also, your shitty height chart is complete observation yet you talk about 'crunching the numbers', though I agree with most of it, i think my post you quoted here is completely perfect. I didn't say face > height I said something irrefutable, which is it's situational but one is more independently condemning, and idiots want a simple x or y

my main and really only problem with you is all your posts are based solely off of personal observation. not '''crunching the numbers''' at all, as you said above. that's what IT does, and it's prone to bias, making you the thousandth user to come here and shit up the forum with a ride or die opinion about height > face or face > height.

if you seriously think being bottom 15% face isn't a death sentence while a 7/10 faced 5'6 doesn't have better, but admittedly not great odds, I'm just going to write you off as a mtn/ltn faced guy whose projected his own height fucking him up onto an insistence that height >>> face. This isn't even an argument, because you admittedly make your threads based off of 'personal observation'

 

[laanda]

I was referring to the height vs face arguement in the other 2 paragraphs

also it still doesn't make it clear because the final paragraph is this

And the answer is face

so either you were referring to voice, or i'm mistaken to think you think height > face. which I assume, because we know you think one is more important, and you said this in your own thread

5'5"/165 - 5'7"/170: Turbomanlet, bottom10%
The smv difference between this height and average height is a similar difference between a bottom 15% and top15% face

why is your ego so high? your positions are impossible to tell from your own posts or they contradict one another, you make them based on personal observation, and yet you think it's my fault you forgot to write them properly

 

[NDManlet173]

you didn't make that clear at all you just blindly said 'face IS more important than voice'. it was your first line.

also, your shitty height chart is complete observation yet you talk about 'crunching the numbers', though I agree with most of it, i think my post you quoted here is completely perfect. I didn't say face > height I said something irrefutable, which is it's situational but one is more independently condemning, and idiots want a simple x or y

my main and really only problem with you is all your posts are based solely off of personal observation. not '''crunching the numbers''' at all, as you said above. that's what IT does, and it's prone to bias, making you the thousandth user to come here and shit up the forum with a ride or die opinion about height > face or face > height.

if you seriously think being bottom 15% face isn't a death sentence while a 7/10 faced 5'6 doesn't have better, but admittedly not great odds, I'm just going to write you off as a mtn/ltn faced guy whose projected his own height fucking him up onto an insistence that height >>> face. This isn't even an argument, because you admittedly make your threads based off of 'personal observation'

Bottom15% face is very bad yes

Depends what percentile you mean for 7/10

5'6.0 barefoot morning is extremely short would need a top4% face to be equal to someone 5'11 roughly

 

[NDManlet173]

also it still doesn't make it clear because the final paragraph is this

so either you were referring to voice, or i'm mistaken to think you think height > face. which I assume, because we know you think one is more important, and you said this in your own thread


why is your ego so high? your positions are impossible to tell from your own posts or they contradict one another, you make them based on personal observation, and yet you think it's my fault you forgot to write them properly

Alr yeah it wasn't clear

Face is slightly more important than height overall because past the top10% of height there's not much benefit but past the top10% of face it gets exponentially better and better, they are extremely close to equal when discussing the bottom90%

My ego isn't high
It's not a contradiction
I said bottom 15% face versus top15% face is similar diff to a roughly bottom4% height is to a bottom50% height
Bottom4% face to bottom50%face would still be a slightly bigger difference.
No contradiction

 

[NDManlet173]

Bottom15% face is very bad yes

Depends what percentile you mean for 7/10

5'6.0 barefoot morning is extremely short would need a top4% face to be equal to someone 5'11 roughly

Equal to someone 5'11 with a 50%ile face if it wasn't clear enough

 

[laanda]

Bottom15% face is very bad yes

Depends what percentile you mean for 7/10

5'6.0 barefoot morning is extremely short would need a top4% face to be equal to someone 5'11 roughly

then why the fuck did you waste my time calling my post which agrees with this, wrong and saying 'if you fucking crunch the numbers bro u can find that face is more important in every situation' if you fucking believe that there are situations where it isn't

My ego isn't high
It's not a contradiction

your ego is fucking raging

i am so fucking tired of how every argument i get into since about 2021, when im right the other person just fucking continues because they can't tolerate the fact they were wrong

you haven't said SHIT about why you fucking disagree with my post. Do you think face isn't more independent than height? That's the point of the post. It's the supported theory of the forum and it's backed up by YEARS of content posted here, fucking studies, chadfish experiments, and guess what everyone elses heckin 'personal observations'. Or are you just wrong about what matters in dating? not knowing what a 7/10 face is, or thinking there aren't 5'7 guys with chadlite faces who have girlfriends? a fucking BOTTOM 15% FACE you're literally either completely wrong, because you go off of what YOU observe (which you also haven't commented on) or you didn't fucking read my original post and disagree with it because i didn't say face > height like x > y. Which is the point of the fucking post, that low patience teenagers fucking refuse to take an answer that isn't x > y and sperg out if you give one. fuck off god i swear someone is paying you to bait me.

 

[NickelodeonCel]

Both are very important and can be a death sentence on their own.

 

[NDManlet173]

then why the fuck did you waste my time calling my post which agrees with this, wrong and saying 'if you fucking crunch the numbers bro u can find that face is more important in every situation' if you fucking believe that there are situations where it isn't


your ego is fucking raging

i am so fucking tired of how every argument i get into since about 2021, when im right the other person just fucking continues because they can't tolerate the fact they were wrong

you haven't said SHIT about why you fucking disagree with my post. Do you think face isn't more independent than height? That's the point of the post. It's the supported theory of the forum and it's backed up by YEARS of content posted here, fucking studies, chadfish experiments, and guess what everyone elses heckin 'personal observations'. Or are you just wrong about what matters in dating? not knowing what a 7/10 face is, or thinking there aren't 5'7 guys with chadlite faces who have girlfriends? a fucking BOTTOM 15% FACE you're literally either completely wrong, because you go off of what YOU observe (which you also haven't commented on) or you didn't fucking read my original post and disagree with it because i didn't say face > height like x > y. Which is the point of the fucking post, that low patience teenagers fucking refuse to take an answer that isn't x > y and sperg out if you give one. fuck off god i swear someone is paying you to bait me.

Holy yappatron nigga

By saying face beats height if you crunch the numbers its very obvious I mean every situation averaged out

Obviously having a 24" bidelt with a 5/10 face is better than having a 16" bidelt with a 5.1/10 face but you don't say BROOOOO FACE ISN'T MORE IMPORTANT THAN FRAME IT'S SITUATION DEPENDENT BROOOO

 

[DreamCoper]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

height matters more but there are diminishing returns to where the ideal height is about 2.5sd’s but face keeps giving more benefits basically linearly.

 

[Genetics_subhuman]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

True

 

[Failed Pullout]

If you're here it doesn't matter

 

[recessed]

It’s over

 

[Mr Black]

Face ofcourse, but only by very little

 

[sbccel]

If you're here it doesn't matter

It’s over

 

[recessed]

 

[LUCK]

Face. Your height only has a real impact once it goes into bottom/top 25% territory, whereas normies with average faces usually struggle with finding relationships.

 

[ESL]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

 

[nxm]

My view on it is that below 5'9 Height is more important but after 5'9 Face matters more.

 

[rob_cel0097]

i now start to belive that a foid will chose height over the face, face is important for them to look at, but their real nature is still of the sadist,masochist, psychopats, so give a 4ft guy chad face, the foids will still choose the taller, uglier dude, a good example is adriana lima who chose the 6'9 ugly dude, while she was the most beautiful model, giving birth to uglier kids than her, passing to them worse genetic that she had!
Face is important, if they have like 5'9, i think they will choose the shorter chad, than the taller uglier at face!
But I think it s because of their real nature of psychopths, sadists, masochists who wants to be dominated and beaten by something more dominant than her!
Thus dominating her, u feed their real nature, that s why they watch the most gore porn, rape, gangrape and this weird stuff!
U won t find in these porn they watch only chad face, but u will see they r tall, good frame, who are brutal with them, dominant more like an animal than a human to them, so i believe this proves that height is better than a short chad face!
What do u think?

Personally, I think both. Having a masculine face is also dominant and attractive to foids, just like height.

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

No face for your height.
No height for your face.

 

[Moggedbyeveryone]

Both. You can't have one without the other. You have to be tall and you have to have a good face. A bad face negates being tall, and being short negates having a good face.

 

[Moggedbyeveryone]

No face for your height.
No height for your face.