like I said in PM if you didn't issue an apology to
@AwakenedArisen then I would out you for this fallacy: you're arguing a straw man here
Arisen said "Just follow whatever defintion suits you best theory" which does not imply you actually created the definition, just that you're following a definition (created by others) which suits you
Also when it changed, in what order are you saying it changed?
I'm not sure how we describe these definitions, but if I had to throw spaghetti:
1) "ephebophilia wants boys" and "hebephilia wants girls" = gendered definitions (what me and Costell and Goldenson/Anderson and Cimbolic/Carter use)
2) "ephebophilia wants older teens" and "hebephilia wants younger teens" = aged definitions (what you and tranny-pushing Blanchard use)
So are you saying it changed from gendered>aged or aged>gendered?
Can you give an example of an IT thread referring to this? This seems like an issue we should cover in the wiki for historical purposes.
Is IT saying that we are the hijackers? Who are they attributing originality to? Antoine Banier? Henry Flynt? Alana Boltwood?
Black-pilled incels may refuse to identify to avoid controversy too, while non-blackpilled incels might identify with the label while not accepting the blackpill.
There's probably some correlation though, if that's what you hint at.
Someone high-inhib enough to 'avoid controversy' via shunning labels would probably be high-inhib regarding what thinking patterns they allow themselves and resist black pills.
at what point in time (year? decade?) are you referencing?
The way Costell wrote about it in 1980 sounded like it was in common use at the time in clinical practice regarding sex offenders.
To be a "sexologist" do you need an MD or PhD? Seems like a label not heavily regulated.
Also I put more faith in how Costell used the term in 1980 than I do in how Blanchard used it in 2005.
This is not an 'evolution', it was 100% a hijack/misuse.
Basically they didn't want a "division by gender" because that lumped heterosexual men and homosexual men into separate groups.
By doing a "division by age" they turn heterosexual men against themselves, splitting them into different camps, while lumping homo and hetero men into shared groups.
Exactly the type of thing a tranny-coddler like Blanchard would love to do to sew confusion.
Originally ephebophilia was applied to ALL pubescent boys being molested, not just those in late puberty
View attachment 573420
by re-branding it as "late puberty" instead of "boys in all stages of puberty" they are basically sheltering homosexuals who were pushing for sex with boys in early adolescence by letting them say "oh no, I didn't mean I was advocating fucking boys who just recently started puberty, I meant boys who were nearly finished it!"
No that's just the Blanchard re-brand. The true meaning of these words is that hebephilia is ALL stages of puberty for girls, and ephebophilia is ALL stages of puberty for boys.
View attachment 573421
