Serious Having "The Political Left" In Power Is More Favourable Than Having "The Political Right" With Current Social & Economic Dynamics

[micropenis29]

I keep seeing people making arguments that I have addressed and even other users have addressed in my place too, like lessthanhuman said:





You keep repeating stuff that has already been "debunked", you say a "A sufficiently right-wing, anarcho-capitalist society", alright i'll agree with you, just to show you how pointless this argument is.

Give me specifics of how you get such a society to come into being based on the current social and cultural climate

Arguing about "how system x or y can come into existence" is very different than arguing whether system x or y would work." You seem to think I'm making a prediction that anarcho-capitalism will come to fruition. I'm not doing that though; I believe a socialist takeover is underway in the U.S. and the rest of the West and that everything is going to shit and that mass starvation will occur, as this is what always happens when socialists take over.

I'm merely saying that what would be best for incels and society as a whole would be anarcho-capitalism.

Voting? - women can currently legally vote, so if you allow people to vote on women being able to vote, guess what happens JFL.

Please, give us some specifics, enough with the BS "well theoretically X system would work", yeah were all aware of that, you are leaving out the most important part, IS IT FEASIBLY POSSIBLE TO BRING SUCH A SYSTEM INTO EXISTENCE?.

Of course it's possible, but again that's irrelevant. Your OP wasn't about predicting the future, it was about whether right-wing or left-wing political systems are better or worse for incels.

THE ANSWER IS NO, there is nothing you can do to create that system, it will be opposed in every manner, if you resort to physical force the nation will treat it as a "coup", other nations will become involved to "defend the rights of women", you can't fight the entire world, and its the entire world that's cucked.

Bringing the right into power "this late in the game" will only be to WOMEN'S BENEFIT, were decades too late for that shit.

I disagree. The far-right has much better principles than the far-left across the board.

JFL are you serious, feminsim literally tries to shame stay at home mothers, the pushes women to work to the point that shit like this happens - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ork-out/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9b0dabd77be3

You're paying too much attention to narratives rather than the actual actions and intentions of the left and the right. The far left worships women and hates men. The far right is not like that. It's simple, really.

The issue I find is that there are too many thirsty men who would be willing to betabuxx used up foids even in the worst of situations. The betabuxx cucked man is the last line of defence for women. Even with all legal and government support for foids removed, they will still have a legion of other thirsty men to swing to if they ever get tired of their husband. Divorce-rape may go down, but the problem would remain.

Previous civilizations were in this conundrum before. I don't think anything short of having laws executing women for adultery or premarital sex will work to stop them from being whores, since this is what every past civilization had to resort to. Especially today in a time of economical prosperity and plenty, it's difficult to conceive that economical pressure would be enough to make women relent on being whores.

Remember that women risk being abused, living in terrible squalid conditions, and being murdered all so that they can have a chance of fucking a Chad. They'll continue with this behavior, and they will only stop being whores if laws executing them for being whores are passed (which there is no chance of in the current political atmosphere). Economical pressure may help, but not by much I feel, and would benefit rich men considerably more than incels.

The goal isn't to change the nature of women; that's of course impossible without some distant future technology. The goal is to incentivize women to behave better. Economic pressure is by far the best means of doing that. More laws are not the answer, as the enforcement of laws requires bigger government, and bigger government always leads to more cucks and foids joining said government, and more cucks and foids in charge always leads to laws eventually changing in favor of cucks and women, such as what we see now.

The only way to change this vicious cycle is to gut and remove all government and accept that things will never be perfect, but they'll be as good as they can be. Foids will always be sluts. That's a given.

I completely agree with you on this point, if government support for feminist and cucked companies were removed then we would know they would be crippled, because women are inferior in every way to men especially in the workforce.. That depends on anarcho-capitalists coming to power though, and their numbers are very few so I don't think it's plausible for them to win.

I don't think it's plausible either, since we're seeing more and more socialists in power. The West has chosen the road to full-blown socialism and it will suffer the catastrophic consequences that come with that choice.

There are a lot of wealthy Chads, and as a rule of thumb, attractive, taller people do better than shorter, uglier people because companies are more likely to hire them (halo effect).

Most of this effect (and perhaps all of it when it comes strictly to hiring for a job that requires skill in a competitive economy) is due to what I mentioned earlier: female and cuck-dominated HR departments and management hierarchies. Trace back the causes though and you'll find that it always comes from bigger government, since bigger government systematically eliminates merit-based competition and replaces it with looks-based competition.

I can't emphasize enough that in a sufficiently competitive (mostly or completely governmentless) economic environment, people can't afford to hire based on looks; raw production matters too much.

I do agree low-class Chads and criminal Chads will suffer greatly without government assistance, but the rich Chads would simply gain an even bigger advantage (than they already have), and many Chads ascend to being rich by the virtue of being good-looking.

Only in professions that directly reward looks do Chads ascend to being rich by virtue of being good-looking. Chads always have the opportunity to make good money by going into acting, modeling, sales, etc. but they will never be able to compete with ugly people that are smarter than them at jobs in which looks don't help (things that require higher levels of intellectual rigor and little to no emotional manipulation). At least not in an economy that the government hasn't sufficiently intervened in and thus warped in favor of lookism.

Sadly, in our fucked up economy, Chads are getting jobs that require math, intellect, etc. because the government has turned into the nightmare that capitalists have long feared: HR departments and our public institutions are so exremely foid-heavy that they'll prioritize looks over literally everything, since the costs of such poor business decisions are so socialized that they're basically paid in full by us incels in the form of heavy taxes. Competition and merit are being completely replaced by corruption, politics, and lookism.

 

[wereqryan]

Low IQ.

 

[lessthanhuman]

The goal isn't to change the nature of women; that's of course impossible without some distant future technology. The goal is to incentivize women to behave better. Economic pressure is by far the best means of doing that. More laws are not the answer, as the enforcement of laws requires bigger government, and bigger government always leads to more cucks and foids joining said government, and more cucks and foids in charge always leads to laws eventually changing in favor of cucks and women, such as what we see now.

The only way to change this vicious cycle is to gut and remove all government and accept that things will never be perfect, but they'll be as good as they can be. Foids will always be sluts. That's a given.

We don't need to change the nature of women. We just need to take inspiration from every past civilization that has existed. We should want a return of patriarchy, where women have no right to work, vote or be educated. And where women having premarital sex or adultery results in the death penalty for them. This has worked throughout history.

I do agree though that anarcho-capitalism is infinitely preferable to the current way of things, but patriarchy would be the best solution to our problems as it has been throughout history. Alternatively, patriarchy could be combined with anarcho-capitalism, most ancient systems had an element of anarcho-capitalism. There was no safety net for women cast out in the street, she would be reduced to a starving beggar, although this was in a time when material prosperity was far less than today.

Most of this effect (and perhaps all of it when it comes strictly to hiring for a job that requires skill in a competitive economy) is due to what I mentioned earlier: female and cuck-dominated HR departments and management hierarchies. Trace back the causes though and you'll find that it always comes from bigger government, since bigger government eliminates merit-based competition and replaces it with looks-based competition.

I can't emphasize enough that in a sufficiently competitive environment, people can't afford to hire based on looks; raw production matters too much.

Only in professions that directly reward looks do Chads ascend to being rich by virtue of being good-looking. Chads always have the opportunity to make good money by going into acting, modeling, sales, etc. but they will never be able to compete with ugly people that are smarter than them at jobs in which looks don't help (things that require higher levels of intellectual rigor). At least not in an economy that the government hasn't sufficiently intervened in and thus warped in favor of lookism.

Sadly, in our fucked up economy, Chads are getting jobs that require math, intellect, etc. because the government has turned into the nightmare that capitalists have long feared: HR departments and our public institutions are so exremely foid-heavy that they'll prioritize looks over literally everything. Ccompetition and merit are being completely replaced by corruption, politics, and lookism.

The number of jobs where looks are important (e.g CEO, or salesman, or manager, or any people skills job) will always be bigger than the number of Chads (who are probably about 5% of the male population, 20% with Chadlites). I think every Chad could get a fairly well-paying job if they had no other options. The reason why Chads get into crime and act like lowlives is because they see an easy shortcut to getting rich and boosting their street cred, but via normal employment they can still be well-off without being rich. So I don't think any Chads would really struggle badly under anarcho-capitalism unless they are drug-addicted/have mental illnesses, but I do agree that there would be more incels overtaking Chads and leaving them in the dust, which would be good.

On all the other points, I fully agree. Women in particular would lose hard in an unrestrained work force. But I have to wonder if these things will benefit incels, or if they will just benefit wealthy men instead. Regardless, I still think the best way at forcing women to fuck us and locking them down is through patriarchy, because we have done it this way throughout history until the last century or so. But, like I said before, I do agree anarcho-capitalism is preferable to the current state of things.

Keep in mind when I criticize the right, and when most people criticize the right, we usually aren't thinking of libertarians or anarcho-capitalists, but of tradcucks, cuckservatives and other such people, who are usually in favor of bigger government and also women's rights. These people also, unfortunately, constitute the vast majority of the right.

 

[Norky]

But at the same time, having women in the workplace has made most jobs significantly more competitive and wages even more stagnant. Also, do women really work in the jobs they have, or just flirt/gossip all day?

 

[Smallondick]

Women being home would be fine with me if they had no rights or freedoms and were forced to obey their husbands' authority.

betabux.

 

[Mainländer]

betabux.

I don't think marriage in a truly traditional society where the status quo was vastly differently can be called "betabuxxing" in the pejorative sense like marrying nowadays can.

 

[Honeypot]

The right worships women more, the left just gives women more privileges and rights.

If the right has their way, women will be at home all day doing nothing, getting pampered by their chad husbands (or beta providers)

If the left have their way women will have an extremely high SMV but will still have to slave away working like the rest of us, they won't do much heavy lifting jobs, but they'll still have to work.

In a world where women don't have to work, and they can only be a home maker, literally their only task all day is to go around looking for chads to fuck and potential beta providers to become husbands (or maybe they marry a chad).

If you actually think if the "modern right" take over its going to be better than the left you aren't considering all the factors. Women will still keep all the shit they have that the left has given them, so now they have all the privileges and now men are lining up to marry and pamper them, giving them work free lives, whether they are a virgin or whore who has sucked 20 different cocks.

At least with the left there is a trade off, also if the right was in power, less bad things would happen to them, because men on the right are more cautious and protective. Do you really want a bunch of 2nd amendment guys walking around when its time for you to "go ER".

There will be less chances to go ER
There will be less opportunities to rape a woman because she'll either be accompanied by a man at night, or has a concealed carry license and has a gun

Having the right fully take power at this point, this late in the game, is only to our detriment, the right is too late to reverse women's whoredom and restore teh natural balance, and a lot of men on the right these days are just tradcon cucks willing to bend over backwards for women, its too late, I say left the left hold on to the mantle, at least then women can suffer a bit.

Is better communism tbh everyone is fucking poor and there aren't betabuxxers with money to maintain the whores, they both have to work only to survive, everyone have to do it, betabuxxers couldn't even betabux, chad will be poor also, forced to raise his one night low inib becky fuck children.

They have tremendous economic resources now, in a third world shithole females worth shit, what is worth is food not fucking holes.

 

[Smallondick]

Involuntary celibacy will be a political talking point within the next 20 years, I guarantee it

By then the sexbots will be starting.

I don't think marriage in a truly traditional society where the status quo was vastly differently can be called "betabuxxing" in the pejorative sense like marrying nowadays can.

You will still be a slave to the job by creating 10 spirited children, and you can use or rape your wife's wide pussy. Prefer a sexdoll
We need less people and genetic engineering, patriarchy will not help it will get worse! That is precisely why leadership supports LGBT, free sex, etc. This reduces the population.

 

[Honeypot]

By then the sexbots will be starting.


You will still be a slave to the job by creating 10 spirited children, and you can use or rape your wife's wide pussy. Prefer a sexdoll
We need less people and genetic engineering, patriarchy will not help it will get worse! That is precisely why leadership supports LGBT, free sex, etc. This reduces the population.

only if you know how bad things are... jews already have taken direct action to wipe out African and spic population, next one will be the asian.

If you rape your wife you will feel the same as fucking a doll tbh, that case should be similar as fucking a whore, 0 pleasure.

 

[Smallondick]

only if you know how bad things are... jews already have taken direct action to wipe out African and spic population, next one will be the asian.

I know it's not a beautiful thing, but a patriarchy is only a development phase, it generates many children and one hour or another will have overpopupalation. Then they will have to find ways to reduce the population. The rate of 1960 was more than 5 children with improved health that will generate a burst one hour, in 1960 that begins the "degeneration" in the current style.

 

[Honeypot]

I know it's not a beautiful thing, but a patriarchy is only a development phase, it generates many children and one hour or another will have overpopupalação. Then they will have to find ways to reduce the population. The rate of 1960 was more than 5 children with improved health that will generate a burst one hour, in 1960 that begins the "degeneration" in the current style.

I was talking about jews literally starting to sterilize most third world woman with diseases never seen before like Zika.

 

[Smallondick]

I was talking about jews literally starting to sterilize most third world woman with diseases never seen before like Zika.

Yes, I do not think it's bad. I forgot that part.

 

[Honeypot]

Yes, I do not think it's bad. I forgot that part.

it's goes much deeper than Zika, Zika is the recent direct action but indirectly global sterilization is a working project from nearly a century ago

 

[Smallondick]

it's goes much deeper than Zika, Zika is the recent direct action but indirectly global sterilization is a working project from nearly a century ago

And it really does, it's better to live in an overpopulated world.

 

[BlkPillPres]

And it really does, it's better to live in an overpopulated world.

This, I don't know what people don't get this, we have too much people on the planet already

@Honeypot
I never got the whole "they are trying to depopulate us" thing, we don't have infinite fucking space on the planet, we don't have infinite fucking resources on this planet, until we start doing interstellar traveling, and we find planets with similar conditions to earth (or we have the technology to sufficiently "terraform" planets), maybe we should slow down a bit with the breeding, there are 8 billion + of us here already, were losing space and running out of natural resources everyday.

Aren't the groups that are sterilizing humans just doing whats necessary to guide humans along a logical path, I think organizations have to do shit like this in secret because they know the average human is like the meme, an NPC, fucking idiots, that if they tried to explain why they did this, and tried to rationalize with people that they can't have a lot of children right now, people would start going up in arms about "muh freedoms" and rebel, and likely start fucking even more and making more babies as an act of rebellion

At a certain point I have to agree with the "illuminati", the average human isn't fit to make choices for themselves, they don't think logically, they are too emotional, if they let humans "run wild" everything would fall apart.

 

[Smallondick]

This, I don't know what people don't get this, we have too much people on the planet already

@Honeypot
I never got the whole "they are trying to depopulate us" thing, we don't have infinite fucking space on the planet, we don't have infinite fucking resources on this planet, until we start doing interstellar traveling, and we find planets with similar conditions to earth (or we have the technology to sufficiently "terraform" planets), maybe we should slow down a bit with the breeding, there are 8 billion + of us here already, were losing space and running out of natural resources everyday.

Aren't the groups that are sterilizing humans just doing whats necessary to guide humans along a logical path, I think organizations have to do shit like this in secret because they know the average human is like the meme, an NPC, fucking idiots, that if they tried to explain why they did this, and tried to rationalize with people that they can't have a lot of children right now, people would start going up in arms about "muh freedoms" and rebel, and likely start fucking even more and making more babies as an act of rebellion

At a certain point I have to agree with the "illuminati", the average human isn't fit to make choices for themselves, they don't think logically, they are too emotional, if they let humans "run wild" everything would fall apart.

Yes..

 

[lastchancel]

low iq

you think women are going to be forced into their homes now that trump is in office? hasn't gone so well yet has it? basically nothing changes. between left and right

 

[Reprobus]

Low IQ.

 

[Salustio]

Tradcucks are not the strong kind of men they pretend to be, they are weaklings, slaves to the white vagina who desperately need the female validation.

I don’t like the tradcuck scum that infected the manosphere. They want to restore patriarchy, a concept invented by feminists, so that proves they felt for the feminist narrative.

Tradcucks are not capable of directing the female behavior, they just need a system that allow them to have a wife, they also need predetermined social roles to follow, so that means that in a patriarchal society tradcucks are the incel’s main issue, they are woman enablers and mangina pussy beggars, because the traditional male role is enabling the female privilege of being a neet and raise children instead of going to work.

An incel have to look for different perspectives, he does not have to follow the normies narrative.
Every social system produces a particular kind of incel. An incel is a person excluded and marginalized by the society he lives in. So, incels do not have to support nor tradcucks neither feminists, they would be barginalized by both.

 

[BlkPillPres]

low iq

you think women are going to be forced into their homes now that trump is in office? hasn't gone so well yet has it? basically nothing changes. between left and right

View attachment 68788

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you didn't read the thread properly or you aren't replying to me and forgot to quote someone arguing against the thread, because what you are saying here is something I agreed with and pointed out in the thread, the fact that the political right would not try to bring back a traditionalist government, so if they were put back into power, women would now just have the perks that the left gave them on top of the perks the right now supplies them with.

 

[lastchancel]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you didn't read the thread properly or you aren't replying to me and forgot to quote someone arguing against the thread, because what you are saying here is something I agreed with and pointed out in the thread, the fact that the political right would not try to bring back a traditionalist government, so if they were put back into power, women would now just have the perks that the left gave them on top of the perks the right now supplies them with.

still lowiq, right wing isn't going to revert to traditionalism, that's much too drastic and requires third position/national socialism to revert to that stage. Right wing will try stop abortion and erode those far left rights. Women will not get extra rights from the right wing.

 

[BlkPillPres]

still lowiq, right wing isn't going to revert to traditionalism, that's much too drastic

Are you trolling or fucking blind?, that's literally what I'm saying, its like you're arguing against an imaginary person right now, can you not read english, my point is literally that the right wing government would never revert to traditionalism. Seriously what is going on here, its like I'm typing one thing and your eyes are reading the opposite.

Women will not get extra rights from the right wing.

They'll the the protection that the right provides, all these "ER's" taking place will be a lot harder to do with a bunch of gun toting 2nd amendment lovers in power. Women would become a truly protected class, the left has the most cucks, but the right has the most white knights, i'll take cucks over white knights.

 

[Honeypot]

This, I don't know what people don't get this, we have too much people on the planet already

@Honeypot
I never got the whole "they are trying to depopulate us" thing, we don't have infinite fucking space on the planet, we don't have infinite fucking resources on this planet, until we start doing interstellar traveling, and we find planets with similar conditions to earth (or we have the technology to sufficiently "terraform" planets), maybe we should slow down a bit with the breeding, there are 8 billion + of us here already, were losing space and running out of natural resources everyday.

Aren't the groups that are sterilizing humans just doing whats necessary to guide humans along a logical path, I think organizations have to do shit like this in secret because they know the average human is like the meme, an NPC, fucking idiots, that if they tried to explain why they did this, and tried to rationalize with people that they can't have a lot of children right now, people would start going up in arms about "muh freedoms" and rebel, and likely start fucking even more and making more babies as an act of rebellion

At a certain point I have to agree with the "illuminati", the average human isn't fit to make choices for themselves, they don't think logically, they are too emotional, if they let humans "run wild" everything would fall apart.

I didn't say I was in favour or not, what I believe is that "illuminati", "jews" or "NWO" are not your friends and they would definitely do harm to you and most people, they are doing it right now in ways you can't imagine. You are a fucking nuance for them, every pleb is and will eventually be a lamb to the slaughter.

Sterilization can be the only good thing they are doing, rest of their intentions are selfish and bad like whatever human being would do with enough power.

 

[lastchancel]

Are you trolling or fucking blind?, that's literally what I'm saying, its like you're arguing against an imaginary person right now, can you not read english, my point is literally that the right wing government would never revert to traditionalism. Seriously what is going on here, its like I'm typing one thing and your eyes are reading the opposite.


They'll the the protection that the right provides, all these "ER's" taking place will be a lot harder to do with a bunch of gun toting 2nd amendment lovers in power. Women would become a truly protected class, the left has the most cucks, but the right has the most white knights, i'll take cucks over white knights.

the left has both cucks and white knights. you have yet to demonstrate what protection the right is providing

Are you trolling or fucking blind? my point is literally that the right wing government would never revert to traditionalism.

If the right has their way, women will be at home all day doing nothing, getting pampered by their chad husbands (or beta providers)

 

[Emergency Manual]

Lefitist are the reason why we live in this shitty society. Feminism, social welfare, tolerance, secularism, ect all lead to this society. 10 years ago the thought of faggots marrying was laughable, now look where we are.

OP is Black, it's no secret he'd prefer the Left. After all, Leftists give Blacks more Gibs (welfare).

 

[lastchancel]

OP is Black, it's no secret he'd prefer the Left. After all, Leftists give Blacks more Gibs (welfare).

high iq

 

[BlkPillPres]

the left has both cucks and white knights.

Yes, but their white knights are weaker and less armed, so they don't even count. Their white knights are spin kicking phones out of peoples hands


The rights white knights will probably shoot you and a lot of them might be military trained.

So yeah, big difference in capabilities of enemies, I choose the side I can likely mop the floor with physically as my enemy JFL. If worst comes the worst, I'd rather my weaker enemy be in power.

 

[lastchancel]

Yes, but their white knights are weaker and less armed, so they don't even count. Their white knights are spin kicking phones out of peoples hands


The rights white knights will probably shoot you and a lot of them might be military trained.

So yeah, big difference in capabilities of enemies, I choose the side I can likely mop the floor with physically as my enemy JFL. If worst comes the worst, I'd rather my weaker enemy be in power.

still waiting on some examples of right wing white knights tbh

 

[BlkPillPres]

Lefitist are the reason why we live in this shitty society. Feminism, social welfare, tolerance, secularism, ect all lead to this society. 10 years ago the thought of faggots marrying was laughable, now look where we are.

Its too late to roll back the dice now, putting the right into power isn't going to undo any of these changes, what part of that don't you guys get. Women will now have all the same rights the left created for them, ontop of being a "truly protected class" as they now have the most proficient white knights at their beck and call, military men, police officers, firemen, etc most are all positions filled by physically fit men who are in most cases politically right or "right leaning". So now women will have the ultimate power, they will use the leftist laws as their "weapon" and they will use the right as their "shield".

Ever played an rpg game, sword and board is a pretty good build, all my builds are sword and board because they are OP, we are fucked if the right takes over now and starts trying to make changes, they'll make everything more safe and secure for women, rape rates will go down, ER's will be virtually impossible, etc.

Female suffering, which was already low to begin with, will begin to decrease drastically. Is that what we really want, just so we can give ourselves THE COPE OF "GETTING ONE OVER ON THE LEFT/WOMEN". It would just be a cope, because we would have inadvertently given them even more power than they had before.

The current right is too weak willed to recreate a true traditionalist society, they won't take away women's voting rights, rights to work, rights to own property, etc. They won't bring back "true slut shaming" and the social ostracization that came with it, they won't do anything that is actually to a significant benefit to men, especially incel males.

Can't you guys see that its too late for the right to step in, they aren't willing to do what is necessary, they'll only give women more power, how many times does this need to be repeated.

 

[Emergency Manual]

@BlkPillPres we are fucked either way. The Left will take our guns and freedom of speech. You wouldn’t even have this forum to cope if SJW’s had their way. The left will plunge the economy into a Venezuela-esque depression and you will be paying $30 for a can of spam.

Even talking to a woman can be considered rape according to a SJW, you want these people to have power? We’d all be in prison for hate crimes because we said faggot or nigger on the internet.

 

[BlkPillPres]

still waiting on some examples of right wing white knights tbh

At the rate you are going here, you seem pretty disingenuous, so I'm already expecting some reply about how this doesn't count or there's no way to tell these guys are of "the right" even though we can clearly deduce that based on their professed religious beliefs, their attire, their speech and the state they live in (especially for the top video, I doubt its a leftist that did that).

You know full well what I say is true and no examples are needed, it self evident by the "culture" of the right, especially white males, everything they do is about protecting white women to preserve their precious race and aryan genetics.





NO ER'S CAN TAKE PLACE IF MEN LIKE THIS BECOME THE CULTURAL NORM.

JFL at hitting a woman in public during this era, you will be beaten by a group of men.

 

[NeetSupremacist]

I don't care as long nobody touches my NEETbux!

 

[lastchancel]

At the rate you are going here, you seem pretty disingenuous, so I'm already expecting some reply about how this doesn't count or there's no way to tell these guys are of "the right" even though we can clearly deduce that based on their professed religious beliefs, their attire, their speech and the state the live in (especially for the top video, I doubt its a leftist that did that).





NO ER'S CAN TAKE PLACE IF MEN LIKE THIS BECOME THE CULTURAL NORM.

JFL at hitting a woman in public during this era, you will be beaten by a group of men.

so a guy defending his own DAUGHTER from a spree shooter is a white knight?? You clearly forgot to take your schitzo medicine today, you are very delusional, that has nothing to do with white knighting. let me help you out; https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=white knighting

all those videos are about shootings, and not about white knighting. I think you want the left wing to bend you over because "increased degeneracy maybe stacey will gib me chance" theory. Lowiq.

also good job ignoring this

 

[BlkPillPres]

@BlkPillPres we are fucked either way. The Left will take our guns and freedom of speech. You wouldn’t even have this forum to cope if SJW’s had their way. The left will plunge the economy into a Venezuela-esque depression and you will be paying $30 for a can of spam.

Even talking to a woman can be considered rape according to a SJW, you want these people to have power? We’d all be in prison for hate crimes because we said faggot or nigger on the internet.

The left already has power, the right just needs to be a "present force" to keep extremes from happening, but I'd never want the right to take over, they just stay where they are as "gate keepers" so I can watch the collapse happen.

so a guy defending his own DAUGHTER from a spree shooter is a white knight?? You clearly forgot to take your schitzo medicine today, you are very delusional, that has nothing to do with white knighting. let me help you out; https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=white knighting

Nice combination, you both cherry picked circumstances and then created a strawman using it.

You are being disingenuous here and picking the one case where there are familial relations, in most of those cases its just some random guy going to the defense of random normies, especially women. There have literally been examples of this where men made themselves literally shields for random women or their girl friends (who will ironically just get a new man).

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012...ds-died-protecting-girlfriends_n_1695290.html

So lets get this straight, there's special exceptions to white knighting now, as long as its a mass shooting its no longer white knighting?.

PLEASE ANSWER ONE QUESTION
If a guy literally jumps into the line of fire and takes bullets for a random foid is he a white knight?

also good job ignoring this
View attachment 68836

the left has both cucks and white knights. you have yet to demonstrate what protection the right is providing

I already addressed this in this very thread. Someone made the same reply, maybe I should have phrased that sentence better.

I never said they'd enforce it, in fact my point is that they won't enforce it, women will have all the perks of the left and all the perks of the right, I don't even want them to have the option to stay home and not work, because due to the changes in male and female SMV it'll be due to betabuxing a husband they barely if ever fuck, or being able to marry Chad out of their league.

 

[Smallus Dickus]

Maybe division on left/right scene of the politics is different in USA and Europe, but right side in my country means primarily less taxation, and more freedom. That's why I will always vote on them. 1/2 of my wage is something I lose to taxes, I mean sure some of those goes to roads or hospitals, but every year bigger and bigger part of it goes to welfare. I'm ugly, but not stupid or lazy so why government takes so much from me just to hand it over to single mothers? No matter who's in charge we gonna be undesirable anyway, but at least I will have my cash in my pocket to use it as I want it

 

[BlkPillPres]

1/2 of my wage is something I lose to taxes

This shit is robbery, in these kinds of countries I would probably be a neet, there's no point in working if I lose fucking 50% of my money, that's very demotivational.

 

[Smallus Dickus]

This shit is robbery, in these kinds of countries I would probably be a neet, there's no point in working if I lose fucking 50% of my money, that's very demotivational.

It fucking is, but it's also impossible to be a neet where I live. It's a 22 catch situation, and I want to save some money because I know taxation will only get worse.

 

[Shower_Taker]

Low IQ.

 

[BlkPillPres]

It fucking is, but it's also impossible to be a neet where I live. It's a 22 catch situation, and I want to save some money because I know taxation will only get worse.

Try being a criminal then, if you have any criminals in your family ask them to show you the ropes, bring you into the fold, preferably white collar crime, but if not blue collar, I could not imagine myself being an "upstanding citizen" in your country. I would be selling drugs or doing something else behind the scenes that isn't taxable to supplement my income.

Maybere there's some kind of loophole. I'm pretty sure working a "taxi" (your car) is taxable, but that's only if you register, establish a "personal clientele", these people are "your friends", you are merely helping a friend out, and they are only paying you because they want to help a friend out lol.

Something like Uber but not taxable, look for loopholes in the law, download a pdf of the tax laws in your country, specifically look into the income tax sections.

 

[Smallus Dickus]

Try being a criminal then, if you have any criminals in your family ask them to show you the ropes, bring you into the fold, preferably white collar crime, but if not blue collar, I could not imagine myself being an "upstanding citizen" in your country. I would be selling drugs or doing something else behind the scenes that isn't taxable to supplement my income.

Maybere there's some kind of loophole. I'm pretty sure working a "taxi" (your car) is taxable, but that's only if you register, establish a "personal clientele", these people are "your friends", you are merely helping a friend out, and they are only paying you because they want to help a friend out lol.

Something like Uber but not taxable, look for loopholes in the law, download a pdf of the tax laws in your country, specifically look into the income tax sections.

Every criminal I know is low-life, drug dealers here are poor except "big fishes".
I would be poor taxi driver + I live in small town + without registration taxi drivers would destroy me.
The best I could(and can ) do is freelancing, doing IT side-jobs, especially for western clients. Fun thing is that even registered, doing jobs for foreign company is taxed much less than just standard job