One thing I commonly see here is the "height Vs. face" debate, but a common nuance that it lacks is that toilets don't actually don't view it like that. To a toilet being tall, having a nice face, being a Non-Hispanic White doesn't actually add to your attractiveness, the opposite is true, being short (below 6'5~6'6), having an average or sub-average face, being non-White or White with a Spanish surname are all just reasons for rejection.
If a man owns a car it doesn't make him more attractive, not having a car simply makes him more unattractive (carpill), being tall doesn't make him more attractive, being average height or short simply makes him unattractive (heightpill), Etc.
This is why gymcels exist, having a muscular physique isn't attractive, it is just that not having one is seen as ugly.
Toilets maintain very high standards for what is to be considered "a man" and if you fail to get their minimum you're not even being considered, but getting their minimum doesn't mean anything either, it just means that they have one less reason to reject you, not one more reason to accept you.
Either you're "the full package" or you're going to be sent back to sender.
If a man owns a car it doesn't make him more attractive, not having a car simply makes him more unattractive (carpill), being tall doesn't make him more attractive, being average height or short simply makes him unattractive (heightpill), Etc.
This is why gymcels exist, having a muscular physique isn't attractive, it is just that not having one is seen as ugly.
Toilets maintain very high standards for what is to be considered "a man" and if you fail to get their minimum you're not even being considered, but getting their minimum doesn't mean anything either, it just means that they have one less reason to reject you, not one more reason to accept you.
Either you're "the full package" or you're going to be sent back to sender.
