Blackpill Have you unpacked your misogyny?

[ItsOverMan]

"This is problematic, I'm going to clap back on this. We need to talk about my trauma. It's a lot to unpack."

 

[reveries]

The fact that there's a term for not liking a group and it's used everywhere and is taken seriously by most people just proves how insanely privileged this group (foids) is. Whenever you bring up misandry it's laughed at, despite it being 100 times more prevalent.

 

[MisfitGuy]

What does that even mean?

According to google Gemini:

"Unpacking one's misogyny" means examining and dismantling internalized sexist beliefs and behaviors that lead to prejudice against women, including recognizing and challenging those beliefs in oneself and others.

There is an assumption that everyone has subconscious or conscious adoption of sexist ideas and stereotypes about women, which can lead to self-devaluation and devaluation of other women. And that one must actively question and challenge these internalized beliefs, recognizing how they manifest in thoughts, words, and actions, and working towards dismantling them.

That to unpack one must:

1. Self-reflect. Listen to your own thoughts and behaviors to identify any possible traces of sexism.
2. Educate- lean about the history and impact of misogyny, and take DEI courses on gender and sexuality.
3. Challenge yourself to change your perspective and question your own biases and beliefs.
4. And lastly support women, stand up for them and challenge sexist attitudes and behaviors when you see them.

DO YOU SEE A PROBLEM WITH ALL OF THIS??

I think the problem about unpacking one's misogyny, at least if I were in the shoes of a female feeling threatened by men who hate women, is that this entire strategy is like shooting yourself in the foot.

BECAUSE THE MORE YOU ACTUALLY "UNPACK" MISOGYNY, THE MORE YOU END UP JUST HATING WOMEN AND SEEING JUST HOW UNFAIR IT ALL IS, ESPECIALLY FOR LOW SMV MEN. Gender theory is aimed at rich Chads feminists are angry at-- and its funny because these Chads will do what they do, and no "feminisms" will ever shame them from the pleasures they extract from women because they are dark triad in the first place., so long as they can continue getting away with it. And it only leaves low SMV high conscientiousness suckers like YOU to suffer, making you feel worse for shit you didn't even do in the first place.

It does not take a rocket scientist to point out random shit like the way men have to pay on dates, the way men have to be taller,etc. And while gender equality advocates point out that these constructs are also part of patriarchy, it still doesn't fundamentally matter, because at the end of the day, all we care about is the results. This is all overly pendantic bullshit, that has cleverly overt goals of subversion. Instead of unpacking misogyny, why don't we just unpack what we all want, fundamentally: STATUS. For both men and women, we just fucking want status okay? And for low SMV men,

THERE IS NO STATUS TO HAVE AS A LOW SMV MALE FEMINIST.

That's all there is to unpack. And I know this, because I have unpacked my misogyny and I unpacked it all the way to BECOMING MOD HERE. Feminists and gender theorists are retarded because they have this very overt goal to neuter men basically, but they setup this overt goal by burying it under cult brainwashing tactics that have the simulacrum of free choice. They are no different than Scientlogists, when you really really question things. When you question things too much, you realize that THERE IS NO CHOICE IN THE CULT. If you don't believe exactly what THEY believe, you are not in the cult. You are NOT an ally. And hey, I'm not saying we are any better. Incels do the exact same things by expelling bluepillers. However at least to us, a bluepilled incel is still fundamentally an incel to us-- they are merely incels that don't deserve a wider community of low SMV men (WHO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND AND RELATE TO YOUR STRUGGLES), because they are fundamentally too delusional thinking they are temporarily embarassed normies that just happen to be incel at this moment in time .

Also, men dont tell women to unpack their misandry. I think if a woman was raped by a man, its safe to assume their hatred for men is justified. This entire post is all a funny way to deconstruct the entire idea of "unpacking one's misogyny" as something that is actually self-sabotaging to feminists. I don't know a single straight man that took a gender studies class, and didn't come out of it either as a raving misogynistic lunatic, or a queerplatonic homo. Thinking about this shit is not normal by any stretch.

I think the more one actually overintellectualizes this shit, the more prone they are to self-bias to begin with, but at the same time, it also proves that the entire academic structure of this idea already has guardrails and rules to have one think in a specific way-- proving this is all a hamsterwheel to neuter you anyway.

I think it's fundamentally unrealistic to brainwash people with an "education" to think in a certain way, unless there are tangible rewards setup-- because anything without objective status rewards for effort put in is fundamentally culty. The only thing that makes sense with regard to having an egalitarian society is more along the lines of: what is YOUR value, what do YOU offer as an indvidual? It feels like hell, but this is the ACTUAL structure of modern society whether you like it or not.

For men, we will never escape the burden of having exorbitant competition with each other for sexual resources. I suppose for some being a "male feminist" is a cuttlefish that could possibly work, but most likely, it WONT. And for women-- there's a reason why OF is better than working at Starbucks 12 hours a day even though you have a Masters degree in Sociology. Being a slut online is higher status than being a good girl wagecuck.

The Pyramid in Reality
10%-20% of Chads and Chadlite
100% of Women
Bottom 80%-90% of Guys

The Pyramid Claimed by Feminists and Libtards
100% of Men
100% of Women

 

[The Scarlet Prince]

Yikes sweetie! Let's unpack this.

 

[NiggasCallmedaDrink]

Yikes let's unpack this

 

[universallyabhorres]

Yikes let's unpack this

 

[Lonelyus]

So I can't become, he never made any offer and didn't reply to my few questions

Yeah he dont reply when he dont want to, So no you will not be a mod.

 

[ogercel]

There is no misogyny. Pointing out women's nature isn't misogyny. Neither is talking about the blackpill.
It is simply in women's nature to crave for the specific kind of man blackpill describes as "Chad". There is nothing malicious or misogynistic about pointing out that truth. It is neither generalization, because every woman's "Chad" is a little different. Women do have preferences, the only 'generalization' here is that each of her desired mates must have some traits that are near-identical with every other woman on the planet, namely:
1. Tall
2. Masculine/Model Face (or twink if she is one of those K-Pop stans/fujo)
3. Broad shoulders
4. Deep voice, or at least not a nasal-sounding one.
5. Socioeconomic status (rich, influential, leader, or at least a man who commands respect of other men)

In essence one woman might crave a white Chad, the next might be more into Latino Chads, or Changs (if they do exist), or perhaps even an Indian chad, but they are all Chad in the end.

And probably many more. Whether this is 'misogynistic' because it puts women in the same category... That is dubious to me. It is simply how it is. It is the truth. Can truth be misogynistic? No, it cannot be.

Calling women whores, sluts, bitches, calling to rape, ect.? Yes, kind of, but then again, I do not support or criticize it. I acknowledge that a lot of us had endured horrible treatment from women, so I at least realize where it comes from. But I refuse to take a side.

What I will say is that this misogyny has an actual benefit to the community (and a drawback), namely that it keeps simps and reddit retards out of derailing our threads. If we weren't the way we are, then this community wouldn't exist, and would collapse due to simpage and other retarded rhetorics. The flaw is that in our misogyny, a lot of users do not actually fully internalize blackpill beliefs and instead cope with their inadequacies by shielding themselves from them with anger, hatred, resentment, ect. It's truly fucked up that this is what we have to do to keep the community from collapsing apart, but what can you do? If there was a better way to run things, then that way would have arisen a long time ago, I think.

Just to clarify, by hatred I mean that a lot of users here do not actually discuss blackpill that much and focus on mindless, sometimes comical-levels of hatred towards normies/chads/foids. It's okay to feel angry or resentful towards them, but this is a blackpill incel forum, so blackpill would be important too. Things need to be repeated or else they will simply disappear. I think @The Enforcer has made a post about this exact thing.

Sir youre GIgaBased!!!