What does that even mean?
According to google Gemini:
"Unpacking one's misogyny" means examining and dismantling internalized sexist beliefs and behaviors that lead to prejudice against women, including recognizing and challenging those beliefs in oneself and others.
There is an assumption that everyone has subconscious or conscious adoption of sexist ideas and stereotypes about women, which can lead to self-devaluation and devaluation of other women. And that one must actively question and challenge these internalized beliefs, recognizing how they manifest in thoughts, words, and actions, and working towards dismantling them.
That to unpack one must:
1. Self-reflect. Listen to your own thoughts and behaviors to identify any possible traces of sexism.
2. Educate- lean about the history and impact of misogyny, and take DEI courses on gender and sexuality.
3. Challenge yourself to change your perspective and question your own biases and beliefs.
4. And lastly support women, stand up for them and challenge sexist attitudes and behaviors when you see them.
DO YOU SEE A PROBLEM WITH ALL OF THIS??
I think the problem about unpacking one's misogyny, at least if I were in the shoes of a female feeling threatened by men who hate women, is that this entire strategy is like shooting yourself in the foot.
BECAUSE THE MORE YOU ACTUALLY "UNPACK" MISOGYNY, THE MORE YOU END UP JUST HATING WOMEN AND SEEING JUST HOW UNFAIR IT ALL IS, ESPECIALLY FOR LOW SMV MEN. Gender theory is aimed at rich Chads feminists are angry at-- and its funny because these Chads will do what they do, and no "feminisms" will ever shame them from the pleasures they extract from women because they are dark triad in the first place., so long as they can continue getting away with it. And it only leaves low SMV high conscientiousness suckers like YOU to suffer, making you feel worse for shit you didn't even do in the first place.
It does not take a rocket scientist to point out random shit like the way men have to pay on dates, the way men have to be taller,etc. And while gender equality advocates point out that these constructs are also part of patriarchy, it still doesn't fundamentally matter, because at the end of the day, all we care about is the results. This is all overly pendantic bullshit, that has cleverly overt goals of subversion. Instead of unpacking misogyny, why don't we just unpack what we all want, fundamentally: STATUS. For both men and women, we just fucking want status okay? And for low SMV men,
THERE IS NO STATUS TO HAVE AS A LOW SMV MALE FEMINIST.
That's all there is to unpack. And I know this, because I have unpacked my misogyny and I unpacked it all the way to BECOMING MOD HERE. Feminists and gender theorists are retarded because they have this very overt goal to neuter men basically, but they setup this overt goal by burying it under cult brainwashing tactics that have the simulacrum of free choice. They are no different than Scientlogists, when you really really question things. When you question things too much, you realize that THERE IS NO CHOICE IN THE CULT. If you don't believe exactly what THEY believe, you are not in the cult. You are NOT an ally. And hey, I'm not saying we are any better. Incels do the exact same things by expelling bluepillers. However at least to us, a bluepilled incel is still fundamentally an incel to us-- they are merely incels that don't deserve a wider community of low SMV men (WHO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND AND RELATE TO YOUR STRUGGLES), because they are fundamentally too delusional thinking they are temporarily embarassed normies that just happen to be incel at this moment in time
.
Also, men dont tell women to unpack their misandry. I think if a woman was raped by a man, its safe to assume their hatred for men is justified. This entire post is all a funny way to deconstruct the entire idea of "unpacking one's misogyny" as something that is actually self-sabotaging to feminists. I don't know a single straight man that took a gender studies class, and didn't come out of it either as a raving misogynistic lunatic, or a queerplatonic homo. Thinking about this shit is not normal by any stretch.
I think the more one actually overintellectualizes this shit, the more prone they are to self-bias to begin with, but at the same time, it also proves that the entire academic structure of this idea already has guardrails and rules to have one think in a specific way-- proving this is all a hamsterwheel to neuter you anyway.
I think it's fundamentally unrealistic to brainwash people with an "education" to think in a certain way, unless there are tangible rewards setup-- because anything without objective status rewards for effort put in is fundamentally culty. The only thing that makes sense with regard to having an egalitarian society is more along the lines of: what is YOUR value, what do YOU offer as an indvidual? It feels like hell, but this is the ACTUAL structure of modern society whether you like it or not.
For men, we will never escape the burden of having exorbitant competition with each other for sexual resources. I suppose for some being a "male feminist" is a cuttlefish that could possibly work, but most likely, it WONT. And for women-- there's a reason why OF is better than working at Starbucks 12 hours a day even though you have a Masters degree in Sociology. Being a slut online is higher status than being a good girl wagecuck.
According to google Gemini:
"Unpacking one's misogyny" means examining and dismantling internalized sexist beliefs and behaviors that lead to prejudice against women, including recognizing and challenging those beliefs in oneself and others.
There is an assumption that everyone has subconscious or conscious adoption of sexist ideas and stereotypes about women, which can lead to self-devaluation and devaluation of other women. And that one must actively question and challenge these internalized beliefs, recognizing how they manifest in thoughts, words, and actions, and working towards dismantling them.
That to unpack one must:
1. Self-reflect. Listen to your own thoughts and behaviors to identify any possible traces of sexism.
2. Educate- lean about the history and impact of misogyny, and take DEI courses on gender and sexuality.
3. Challenge yourself to change your perspective and question your own biases and beliefs.
4. And lastly support women, stand up for them and challenge sexist attitudes and behaviors when you see them.
DO YOU SEE A PROBLEM WITH ALL OF THIS??
I think the problem about unpacking one's misogyny, at least if I were in the shoes of a female feeling threatened by men who hate women, is that this entire strategy is like shooting yourself in the foot.
BECAUSE THE MORE YOU ACTUALLY "UNPACK" MISOGYNY, THE MORE YOU END UP JUST HATING WOMEN AND SEEING JUST HOW UNFAIR IT ALL IS, ESPECIALLY FOR LOW SMV MEN. Gender theory is aimed at rich Chads feminists are angry at-- and its funny because these Chads will do what they do, and no "feminisms" will ever shame them from the pleasures they extract from women because they are dark triad in the first place., so long as they can continue getting away with it. And it only leaves low SMV high conscientiousness suckers like YOU to suffer, making you feel worse for shit you didn't even do in the first place.
It does not take a rocket scientist to point out random shit like the way men have to pay on dates, the way men have to be taller,etc. And while gender equality advocates point out that these constructs are also part of patriarchy, it still doesn't fundamentally matter, because at the end of the day, all we care about is the results. This is all overly pendantic bullshit, that has cleverly overt goals of subversion. Instead of unpacking misogyny, why don't we just unpack what we all want, fundamentally: STATUS. For both men and women, we just fucking want status okay? And for low SMV men,
THERE IS NO STATUS TO HAVE AS A LOW SMV MALE FEMINIST.
That's all there is to unpack. And I know this, because I have unpacked my misogyny and I unpacked it all the way to BECOMING MOD HERE. Feminists and gender theorists are retarded because they have this very overt goal to neuter men basically, but they setup this overt goal by burying it under cult brainwashing tactics that have the simulacrum of free choice. They are no different than Scientlogists, when you really really question things. When you question things too much, you realize that THERE IS NO CHOICE IN THE CULT. If you don't believe exactly what THEY believe, you are not in the cult. You are NOT an ally. And hey, I'm not saying we are any better. Incels do the exact same things by expelling bluepillers. However at least to us, a bluepilled incel is still fundamentally an incel to us-- they are merely incels that don't deserve a wider community of low SMV men (WHO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND AND RELATE TO YOUR STRUGGLES), because they are fundamentally too delusional thinking they are temporarily embarassed normies that just happen to be incel at this moment in time
.Also, men dont tell women to unpack their misandry. I think if a woman was raped by a man, its safe to assume their hatred for men is justified. This entire post is all a funny way to deconstruct the entire idea of "unpacking one's misogyny" as something that is actually self-sabotaging to feminists. I don't know a single straight man that took a gender studies class, and didn't come out of it either as a raving misogynistic lunatic, or a queerplatonic homo. Thinking about this shit is not normal by any stretch.
I think the more one actually overintellectualizes this shit, the more prone they are to self-bias to begin with, but at the same time, it also proves that the entire academic structure of this idea already has guardrails and rules to have one think in a specific way-- proving this is all a hamsterwheel to neuter you anyway.
I think it's fundamentally unrealistic to brainwash people with an "education" to think in a certain way, unless there are tangible rewards setup-- because anything without objective status rewards for effort put in is fundamentally culty. The only thing that makes sense with regard to having an egalitarian society is more along the lines of: what is YOUR value, what do YOU offer as an indvidual? It feels like hell, but this is the ACTUAL structure of modern society whether you like it or not.
For men, we will never escape the burden of having exorbitant competition with each other for sexual resources. I suppose for some being a "male feminist" is a cuttlefish that could possibly work, but most likely, it WONT. And for women-- there's a reason why OF is better than working at Starbucks 12 hours a day even though you have a Masters degree in Sociology. Being a slut online is higher status than being a good girl wagecuck.
Last edited:
