I think of this often. Humanity is physiologically very degraded. I honestly think we're the worst of the entire animal kingdom. Reminder that humanity evolved out of arboreal animals like monkeys (oversimplification but whatever) and arboreal animals are usually very static and docile. When we evolved to become successful terrestrials like homo erectus and neanderthals, that was when we were the fittest, strongest, and most dopaminergic. Hunting produces novelty seeking and is fundamentally dopaminergic.
When civilization came about, we effectively returned to our passive static arboreal plant eating soy and jewish state of being as docile and depressed beings. The more static we became because of agriculture and specialization of roles (castes), the less we hunted and gathered and the more we became subhuman. The races that hunted the most (Whites and Blacks) possess a good percentage of people who have retained their vitality and I'd argue that they're the least degraded of all. Meanwhile, all the tropical passive jewish civilizations are full of degraded people who are over-reliant on civilization and technology and are fundamentally degraded, dysgenic, and diseased. These people pollute their environments the most.
When civilization came about, we effectively returned to our passive static arboreal plant eating soy and jewish state of being as docile and depressed beings. The more static we became because of agriculture and specialization of roles (castes), the less we hunted and gathered and the more we became subhuman. The races that hunted the most (Whites and Blacks) possess a good percentage of people who have retained their vitality and I'd argue that they're the least degraded of all. Meanwhile, all the tropical passive jewish civilizations are full of degraded people who are over-reliant on civilization and technology and are fundamentally degraded, dysgenic, and diseased. These people pollute their environments the most.
