Blackpill Has IncelKing lived up to the hype as blkpillpress’s most ardent disciple?
He's a retard as was Blkpillpress. I blocked him long ago.
he has in terms of escortmaxxing but not in paragraphmaxxing lol
He has the edgyness of blkpillpress but none of the iq
No. That brotha was legendary, though I don't agree with all of his takes. Bordered a bit too much on redpill for me.
Disciple can nevER replace the prophet.
Nobody can replace blkpillpres.
He was one-of-a-kind.
Nobody can replace blkpillpres.
He was one-of-a-kind.
B
There is no cock for him to hold up now.
Escortmaxxing is king
Wish more of us were into it, sex is good even without a "true intimacy and connection".
Disciples exist not only to follow, but also to surpass their master. A disciple who only follows is a failure - Even if he can't surpass the master, he should strive to try and push for it.
@Fat Link give me the discord invitation pleas
I argue that Mainlander surpass schopenhauer
Unblock me you emotional foid in sheep's clothing
I dont think incelking as high iq as blkpillpres
Why do you fuckers need to make this shit a hobby constantly?
B
Thank you for identifying yourself as an utter moron. JFL
I miss bippy!
(B p p)
He was my favorite nigger!
(B p p)
He was my favorite nigger!
Ive read Mainlander alrighy, I said not in philosophy but in commitment. Mainlander was a virgiin till the end of his life, he saw his last purpose as by writing philopie ersolung, once thats done he took the decision to salvage himself and escape from life hells, and thus not pass on anything. He is an egoist in contrast to the schopenhauerian essent of man. Since every human are nothing more but a piece of god, we are nothing more than a aloner which are heading to death as he proclaim form intended it to be that way, as nonexistence is better than existence
I would argue that Mainlander is quite naive, he argue in contrast with the schopenhauer that the state provided the great man with open eyes to this sort of knowledge, while not acknowledging the the masses are what keep the states at bay. Soo humanity will never comes to his mainlenderian conclusion. Lets discuss about apriori, he is generalizing the humans by telling everyone can denied the will to life, through spritual effort in contrast with Schopenhauer will to live wherre only a few can denied the which exist in ourself which push us to propogate and keep the burning light going, as long as life keep coming out, the will to live doesnt give a shit. It only purpose and objective is, to spread as it is irrational after all. I also will comment that is why people should read about plato the forms of good and kant transcedental ideas if he wanted to understand more about this.
SCHOPENHAUER on the other hand, sleep with multiple woman, had a child but the kid die I think. He doesnt really abide by his philosophy or offer the end and be all solution, sure theres asceticsm and enjoyment of aethestics but he himself didnt follow his philosophy in such rigid manner.
Its fine of being callled a retard, even schopie himself told that to his reader lol, thank you brocel for correcting my statement.
Last edited:
different in his criticism segment is, schopie argues it is intellect that makes us see the true world, while for mainlander it is our inner self. Gift for by god as we had human intellect to reason and made the indefinite conclusion that life is a horror shitshow, and its better to just hang ourself
Last edited:
(In order to prevent misconceptions, I remark, that according to my
epistemology, perception is not intellectual but rather spiritual: a work of the complete mind. The merit
of Schopenhauer lies in the fact, that he denied the senses the ability to perceive in Fourfold Root.)
epistemology, perception is not intellectual but rather spiritual: a work of the complete mind. The merit
of Schopenhauer lies in the fact, that he denied the senses the ability to perceive in Fourfold Root.)
I have expressed, that those forms (space, time and causality) are the brain’s share ine
perception, just as specific sense impressions are the share of the respective sense organs.
Just as our eye produces green, red and blue; so does our brain produce time, space and
causality (whose objectified abstractum is matter). My perception of a body is the product of
my sense-function and brain-function with x.- schopenhauer
perception, just as specific sense impressions are the share of the respective sense organs.
Just as our eye produces green, red and blue; so does our brain produce time, space and
causality (whose objectified abstractum is matter). My perception of a body is the product of
my sense-function and brain-function with x.- schopenhauer
Mainlander in the end is an apostle of schopenhauer, the spreader of his belief. And a true man to his own words till the end.
can the same be said about incelking? not in the slightest compared to blkpillpres
but also a criticist
have you read peter wessel zaffe?
in the end iam more more of a cioran kind of guy. I after all have I have adhd, so its hard for me to sit keep concetrating
Last edited:
schopie argue human senses are nothing more but the effect of intellect. Mainlander argues differently on this one
Last edited:
I also havent fully read the world as will and represantations yet. I am willing to correct myself @based_meme
ive read already the wisdom of life, essay and aphorisms and planning to read the fourfold root first before the world as will and represantations back
cause and effect in play, our sensation of the body are influenced by the mind, not everyone lament bach music and can see its beuaty, not evrybody can see the comedy of human existence, not everybody perceive colors the same. Its the Brain, that sensation. Thus the outside worlfd represent it to us. Thats why brocel, you are kinda right if you said that this world exist only in my mind, because its true. Law of causality and space and matters in play
its not solipism per say, it is a represantations. remember that. I still have a lot to learn for denial of the will to live
Generally expressed, matter is that form of Understanding, which objectifies the certain and specially
determined way of activity of a body. Without it the outside world, despite senses, causal law and space,
would be closed for us. All activities, all forces must first become materialized (substantive), before it
becomes something for us. Schopenhauer is right that matter is the carrier of forces and for our
knowledge the vehicle of qualities and forces of nature, but well-understood: it is in our head, the force
remains outside and independent of the head. Every force is for our knowledge material, in the object
they are inseparable. However force is, independently from subject, not material: it is only force, or
according to the brilliant teaching of Schopenhauer, only will.
determined way of activity of a body. Without it the outside world, despite senses, causal law and space,
would be closed for us. All activities, all forces must first become materialized (substantive), before it
becomes something for us. Schopenhauer is right that matter is the carrier of forces and for our
knowledge the vehicle of qualities and forces of nature, but well-understood: it is in our head, the force
remains outside and independent of the head. Every force is for our knowledge material, in the object
they are inseparable. However force is, independently from subject, not material: it is only force, or
according to the brilliant teaching of Schopenhauer, only will.
I agree with schopenhauer overall. Mainlander while bleak, is actually quite optimistic
B
I was only joking around. I personally don't care at all which philosophies you agree with or aspire to.
cool bro I though you were being dead serious
B
Similar threads
Discussion
What do you see for the future of Blackpill
- TheFinalFrontier
- Inceldom Discussion
TheFinalFrontier
Ambush
Blackpill
Canary in the Coalmines event #2: 60 year old flatmate & why "Life Expectancy" is misleading
- UndeadDeadMan
- Inceldom Discussion
nihilum
Users who are viewing this thread
