BlkPillPres
I'm Not A Monster, I'm Just Ahead Of The Curve
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Posts
- 16,486
- Online
- 126d 5h 5m
Your life is miserable because you aren't sexually satisfied
People often bring up Elliot Roger going on and on about loneliness in his manifesto, and falsely cite that as an example of proof, that inceldom is about loneliness, lack of companionship and female affection, etc
That's nothing but a misunderstanding of the situation of the scenario, allow me to explain
Elliot wanted a blonde stacy, went on and on about blonde girls in his manifesto, if he was fucking a 5/10 brunette at that time in his life, that gave him all her holes and was deep throating him daily, that manifesto would never have existed and that's a fact (like a friends with benefits thing, they don't really talk or hang out, just fuck)
He'd still want a blonde stacy for a while, but he'd care a lot less about it, and would actually be satisfied with the girl he had, and likely one day he'd give up on getting a blonde stacy and think of it as a "childish dream" and settle down with that brunette who kept him satisfied and never cucked him
So that "dream companionship", that "perfect relationship" he thinks he wants (what a lot of us think we want), like magic doesn't really matter if you think about it, if you are being sexually satisfied you'll likely stick with where your bread is buttered, but most of us have neither sexual satisfaction nor companionship, so its easy to conflate the yearning caused by lack of sex with loneliness
Companionship doesn't matter, everything comes down to being satisfied
THE ONLY REASON YOU THINK YOU WANT MORE THAN SEXUAL SATISFACTION IS BECAUSE YOU'VE NEVER HAD CONSISTENT ACCESS TO SEX AND EXPERIENCED THE SATISFACTION IT BRINGS YOU
THIS IS THE PART WHERE I REALLY NEED YOU TO PAY ATTENTION AND READ CAREFULLY
Its very convenient to argue that its about "being lonely" when you've never had sexual satisfaction, its more likely that he [Elliot] (and other incels) were just sexually frustrated and began to conflate that frustration with being lonely, because "being with a woman" (not being lonely) is the prerequisite (initial requirement) to get sex
Let me give you an analogy so you get my point:
There's a guy who is frustrated and complaining about not being 16 years old yet, and that he can't drive a car because its illegal at his age
You are saying he's frustrated because he's 16 years old, I'm saying you're wrong, the prerequisite to drive is being 16 years old
What he really wants to do is drive, not be 16, he just has to be 16 to drive, and he speaks as if he hates being under 16 because he gets teased about it, but if he could drive he wouldn't care that he's under 16
He like you, is falsely conflating his frustration with being 16, when actually he's frustrated that he can't drive, if he could skip the age limit and just drive, he wouldn't care about being under 16 and getting teased about it, the driving is the issue, not the age (sexual satisfaction is the issue, not lacking companionship/loneliness)
People often bring up Elliot Roger going on and on about loneliness in his manifesto, and falsely cite that as an example of proof, that inceldom is about loneliness, lack of companionship and female affection, etc
That's nothing but a misunderstanding of the situation of the scenario, allow me to explain
Elliot wanted a blonde stacy, went on and on about blonde girls in his manifesto, if he was fucking a 5/10 brunette at that time in his life, that gave him all her holes and was deep throating him daily, that manifesto would never have existed and that's a fact (like a friends with benefits thing, they don't really talk or hang out, just fuck)
He'd still want a blonde stacy for a while, but he'd care a lot less about it, and would actually be satisfied with the girl he had, and likely one day he'd give up on getting a blonde stacy and think of it as a "childish dream" and settle down with that brunette who kept him satisfied and never cucked him
So that "dream companionship", that "perfect relationship" he thinks he wants (what a lot of us think we want), like magic doesn't really matter if you think about it, if you are being sexually satisfied you'll likely stick with where your bread is buttered, but most of us have neither sexual satisfaction nor companionship, so its easy to conflate the yearning caused by lack of sex with loneliness
Companionship doesn't matter, everything comes down to being satisfied
THE ONLY REASON YOU THINK YOU WANT MORE THAN SEXUAL SATISFACTION IS BECAUSE YOU'VE NEVER HAD CONSISTENT ACCESS TO SEX AND EXPERIENCED THE SATISFACTION IT BRINGS YOU
THIS IS THE PART WHERE I REALLY NEED YOU TO PAY ATTENTION AND READ CAREFULLY
Its very convenient to argue that its about "being lonely" when you've never had sexual satisfaction, its more likely that he [Elliot] (and other incels) were just sexually frustrated and began to conflate that frustration with being lonely, because "being with a woman" (not being lonely) is the prerequisite (initial requirement) to get sex
Let me give you an analogy so you get my point:
There's a guy who is frustrated and complaining about not being 16 years old yet, and that he can't drive a car because its illegal at his age
You are saying he's frustrated because he's 16 years old, I'm saying you're wrong, the prerequisite to drive is being 16 years old
What he really wants to do is drive, not be 16, he just has to be 16 to drive, and he speaks as if he hates being under 16 because he gets teased about it, but if he could drive he wouldn't care that he's under 16
He like you, is falsely conflating his frustration with being 16, when actually he's frustrated that he can't drive, if he could skip the age limit and just drive, he wouldn't care about being under 16 and getting teased about it, the driving is the issue, not the age (sexual satisfaction is the issue, not lacking companionship/loneliness)
Last edited:
