Blackpill [Hard To Swallow Edition] Masturbation Could Never Be A Substitute For Sex (Sexbots Are Nothing But A Cope)

[BlkPillPres]

I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that

 

[Dionysus]

I wish I could stop masturbating tbh. Its just a waste of time for me

 

[narcissist]

I wish I could stop masturbating tbh. Its just a waste of time for me

I did no porn for like 10 days, porn is the real issue

 

[Deleted member 19858]

Are there really a lot of users denying this though? I believe most people that are into dolls view it as a second best option considering the prospect of ever having genuine sex inconceivable.

 

[truthpill]

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man

Brutal truthpill boyo

 

[BlkPillPres]

I wish I could stop masturbating tbh. Its just a waste of time for me

I'm not saying stop, but don't cope and tell yourself its a substitute for sex

Brutal truthpill boyo

This is why I believe the physical satisfaction a man gets from the act of rape likely far exceeds that of a consensual sex act,, and this is why men who rape once always go on to rape again.

Think about it, the men who rape (especially serial rapists) know full well they can possibly be arrested and sent to jail, killed, get an std, etc, its a very risky crime where you can leave dna and get caught, but they ignore all of that and still pursue the act again and again and again, and that's because the pleasure and feeling of power and satisfaction it grants overrides all logic, a man will do almost anything to attain that feeling again

 

[Vermilioncore]

We must all forcefully take a girl and mark her with our seed

 

[Deleted member 15737]

There is a lot more to sex than just orgasming. Skin to skin contact, pheromones and smells, emotional bonding, ect.

Anything other than a submissive virgin wife is cope. That’s why all major religions valued and enforced virgin brides. The Christian metaphor of true Christians being the virgin bride ordained in white.

Everything is fucking cope, the disgusting humanist luciferian elite have successfully destroyed everything. Armageddon is nigh.

 

[roboticsmaxx]

I kinda feel the need to defend my area of research.

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

This argument actually supports sexbots against hand-wringers who cry that sexbots will teach men to rape and abuse and treat women like objects. Sexbots won't, because sociopaths want a living creature with free will to subjugate. They know that robots won't sate that urge. Similarly, guys who like the chase and power play will prefer human females, specifically, bi-polar women with a propensity to splash paint and key their Ferrari. You bet that's what they're getting when they're not having gymnastic monkey sex.

Sexbots are for a different class -- the introverted men who want stability and a warm body to hug unlimited times. Two weeks is actually good enough length to program a honeymoon type of scenario (about the same length of time to beat the main campaign of an RPG), then the rest of the programming can just be spent being a loving companion, which is just a few lines of code. It is precisely for this reason my research is into using video game engines to supply the AI for the robots. Because the alternative would be a biological AWALT who will start to monkeybranch when the stability sets in and she's guaranteed cash and prizes for pressing the eject button.

I have a sex doll, and I have read accounts from others in the sex doll forums, sex dolls take the edge off by about 50% minimum. Robots can probably bring that up to about 80%. I'd say that's good enough for the majority of men.

 

[Deleted member 17997]

@Magnanimity thoughts?

 

[Magnanimity]

Juicy thread. You had me up until your cold hard conclusion: dominance. I think that there is a lot more to be said about sexuality, male sexuality and human sexuality. I see how that can be an easy conclusion to draw given a cursory look at the animal kingdom, but I believe the nuance of sex and the potential of humanity far exceed a mere drive for dominance; if this is true, then it must be equally true of women as well, as the notion cuts more deeply than sex to suggest that the driving force behind all of life is dominance, or else it should be easy to admit that dominance isn't the only thing that we value about sex.

To assess whether dominance truly is the driving force behind life, though, we must first assess what drives evolution. The fundamental property of survival is clearly the driving force behind life, as that which does not survive dies, and that which is fit to survive carries on; it is a self evident truth. What defines survival, and survival of the fittest, though, is and always has been a variable that changes in every given moment and in every given environment. We can observe how the motivation to dominate has been synonymous with survival for time immemorial, and yet, there are other aspects of survival which are just as or more conducive to survival, such as cooperation.

The Lord Jesus Christ, bless his heart, our Lord and Savior, 10/10 Chad volcel for life as he was, was condemned by the Romans and accepted his unjust death with grace, and as a consequence, his story of mercy for mankind and his message of the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven is the story most widely recognized and renowned the world over. While this is not suggestive of biological fitness, this tells us something very important: what is important to most people is not necessarily brutality and punishment--it is grace and compassion. Granted, the Bible has at times throughout history been spread by violence, or that parts of the Bible speak of a vengeful God, the ultimate message is that of the story of a man who died on the cross. Indeed, the durability of holy texts such as the Bible are rooted in their spiritual message. We can't expect everyone to be perfect, but what we can say with certainty is that many of the most renowned thinkers and leaders have been pacifist.

There are a great many warlord as well--but to suggest thay dominance is the only driving force behind sexuality is a most shallow assertion; I think for most people, there is a strong fantasy of mutuality and empathy involved in sex.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

We must all forcefully take a girl and mark her with our seed

Based and gengis khan red army golden horde pilled

 

[CopeToNotRope]

It’s more about the physical touch and sensation


I don’t even know what breast feel like

 

[Deleted member 14536]

I think you are underestimating how advanced sexbots could be

 

[iblamemyself]

You are right about porn and jerking off. But...

I think you are underestimating how advanced sexbots could be

 

[Deleted member 20207]

High IQ. I agree with everything. Masturbation and sexbots are nothing but a huge cope.

 

[needsolution]

masturbation is my greatest cope to be honest

 

[BlkPillPres]

I think you are underestimating how advanced sexbots could be

I don't think you get the point, if you program an advanced AI with a "resist" function to put up some resistance against you trying to fuck it, you'll still know full well its just a robot and not actually resisting, its not feeling any pain, any fear, etc

You would have to fuck the robot without you knowing its a robot, for it to be truly satisfying, you'd need a placebo, as long as you know its just a robot, it won't cut it

 

[roboticsmaxx]

I don't think you get the point, if you program an advanced AI with a "resist" function to put up some resistance against you trying to fuck it, you'll still know full well its just a robot and not actually resisting, its not feeling any pain, any fear, etc

You would have to fuck the robot without you knowing its a robot, for it to be truly satisfying, you'd need a placebo, as long as you know its just a robot, it won't cut it

This is no different than being a knowing betabux with full awareness that she has no genuine desire for you. Robots are for the betabuxxers.

I also believe robots should remain emotionless unless expressly simulated. Whoever actually programs the robots with the ability to feel genuine pain is on a whole another level of fucked up.

 

[Haywire]

yes OP this is what ive thought when some members say get a doll. also i think you need a certain size dick or many foids will laugh at you even as chad.

 

[guaucel]

Sometimes your posts seem IT or Normie tier. Technology is going to replace women. There is no doubt on that.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Sometimes your posts seem IT or Normie tier. Technology is going to replace women. There is no doubt on that.

If we created a bar of food subtrate for the sake of filling your stomach, it would cure "hunger" in a sense, but you'd still lack nutrition and waste away anyways, the only technology that can replace women, is black market human cloning, anything else is a cope.

 

[Parrtlord]

I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that

I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, SUBMISSION

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman pins you down and makes love to you, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "Karate Femdom POV", that's the entire point of the "POV", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act 1st person and see a woman on top of you/loving and dominating you (the camera) its an act of being loved and pursued whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" you as hers and only hers. It's like planting a flag on territory she claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't be dominated something that resembles by a woman that you own. A sex bot doesn't have the free will to pursue you, it has no ownership of your body to begin with.

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after being fucked by her for q month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without female domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a blacktarpill-cels, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of being conquered someone that isnt a male, having them baby you, the feeling of being owned and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that...

 

[FukFeminism]

It’s more about the physical touch and sensation


I don’t even know what breast feel like

OP is right, but it isn't just about dominance. The closeness with someone, and the knowledge that they aren't just letting you do these things but they want it. Of course, it also feels much better than jerking off. (I have escortceled unfortunately.) Honestly, now that I think of it, I never considered it anywhere near close.

It always just makes me sad.

It's over

 

[Shinitai]

I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops

Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger

There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating

If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating

If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc

Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE

There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK

Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT

Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)

This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet

You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that

If you had sex why are you here

 

[Twinkcel]

Sexbots don’t have to emulate the real thing or look human like. They could be their own thing that gives superior sexual experience to the real thing which is easy if you had sex with an escort you will know what I mean.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Sexbots don’t have to emulate the real thing or look human like. They could be their own thing that gives superior sexual experience to the real thing

JFL how

It would have to emulate, sweating, warmth, pleasure spasms, moans, etc to be as good as real sex, and even then you'd know full well its just a robot and not a woman submitting her body to you use, it isn't going to have the same appeal, it would just be expensive masturbation, one upside will be no risk of stds though, so I guess it wouldn't be all that bad of a purchase

 

[Deleted member 11032]

 

[chadlandic]

Good thread

 

[FinnCel]

OP
High IQ analysis

 

[Salustio]

Indeed, sexdolls are a preferable option. I can frame the same argument you made about coping, telling that having a 3D foid is just a cope because you can't afford a better version, a 3D realdoll.

I don't have a realdoll, but I have masturbation devices, the feeling is similar to that of a true pussy, and the validation I get from foids is almost nonexistent. You believe that misogynistic people like me aren't real? I exist.

Sexdolls is the ultimate final goal of true incels. Not patriarcucked return to the past, not beta rebellion. We want advanced robots, with a small AI, only to satisfy sexual urges. Please fuck off if you want to argue in favor of the validation meme. You're not blackpilled if you are still thinking about validation.

 

[TheNEET]

that's why you gotta schizomaxx and fuck a succubus or your own thoughtform

 

[tulasdanslos]

Please fuck off if you want to argue in favor of the validation meme. You're not blackpilled if you are still thinking about validation.

As retarded as he is, I gotta give it to him that he's one of the most ardent anti-validation adherents in this website. His point is about dominance and high T sex, for example I imagine handcuffing the girl wouldn't be good enough if she couldn't get hurt by it, and other responses unique to humans.

that's why you gotta schizomaxx and fuck a succubus or your own thoughtform

Bruh .

 

[BlkPillPres]

Please fuck off if you want to argue in favor of the validation meme. You're not blackpilled if you are still thinking about validation.

I don't think you read what I said properly

 

[Salustio]

because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind

This is just speculation. I can see how validation addicted cucks are not satisfied even entering the sex-circle. Of course I cannot talk about sexual experiences of other people because everything in this website that is not pedistalizing womben and crying misery is labeled as "cope".

But there are married people, ok? MARRIED PEOPLE, who followed this validation addiction meme, OK? They did everything society told them to reach this stupid validation meme, and then, they married... and where's the validation? They can have "free" sex, so why do they have to go find hookers? My god, unbelievable! I guess I'm coping right now, because validation is so important, it must be that I am cherrypicking random people, what a coper I am.

If I claim that prostitutes are a PREFERABLE option to having a GF/wife, I will be called "coper", ok? This is the culture enforced in this place right now.

Right now, everything that is not crying misery, is labeled as "cope", and I'm tired. Here in this website there are clinical depressed people, with true diagnostic labels, there are mentally ill people, that can only rely on antidepressants, because their brain is totally damaged. This "validation" meme came out from the minds of clinical depressed people, and it's way smaller than it really is.

Regarding your argument: You are lying, you know it. Sexual urges, as shown by several theories (also the Maslow meme) is the only primal need you have, and you can satisfy it by just jerking off (porns or fantasy). You are talking of things in the top of the pyramid, "self actualization", it's more a desire of romance and intimacy, but you framed as some sort of derivate of the validation meme.

 

[tulasdanslos]

This is just speculation. I can see how validation addicted cucks are not satisfied even entering the sex-circle. Of course I cannot talk about sexual experiences of other people because everything in this website that is not pedistalizing womben and crying misery is labeled as "cope".

There is a rule against foid worship, the fuck are you talking about?

But there are married people, ok? MARRIED PEOPLE, who followed this validation addiction meme, OK? They did everything society told them to reach this stupid validation meme, and then, they married... and where's the validation? They can have "free" sex, so why do they have to go find hookers? My god, unbelievable! I guess I'm coping right now, because validation is so important, it must be that I am cherrypicking random people, what a coper I am.

People in a relationship in 2019 still have more sex than single people on median, only Chad can compete with their amount of sex while single.

If I claim that prostitutes are a PREFERABLE option to having a GF/wife, I will be called "coper", ok? This is the culture enforced in this place right now.

No, I will call you a soy-guzzling mangina, because that's what you are, giving money to a hooker and her pimp means you have abandoned all dignity.

Right now, everything that is not crying misery, is labeled as "cope", and I'm tired. Here in this website there are clinical depressed people, with true diagnostic labels, there are mentally ill people, that can only rely on antidepressants, because their brain is totally damaged. This "validation" meme came out from the minds of clinical depressed people, and it's way smaller than it really is.

Pretending that Meds have it as bad as ethnics is also bordering on psychosis, yet I don't go around saying you are mentally ill. Also, ever heard of depressive realism? These people have just correctly identified the biggest hurdle of their life, lack of validation, and have come to the conclusion that it can't be overcome as a sub 8 male.

Regarding your argument: You are lying, you know it. Sexual urges, as shown by several theories (also the Maslow meme) is the only primal need you have, and you can satisfy it by just jerking off (porns or fantasy). You are talking of things in the top of the pyramid, "self actualization", it's more a desire of romance and intimacy, but you framed as some sort of derivate of the validation meme.

This is actual major cope. Masturbation is never seen on the wild, our evolutionary cousins (chimps, bonobos) that masturbate only do so when in captivity. Humans are social animals and absolutely need sex for our mental well being. You can't just masturbate and call it a day, that's bluepilled.

 

[Salustio]

Pretending that Meds have it as bad as ethnics is also bordering on psychosis, yet I don't go around saying you are mentally ill. Also, ever heard of depressive realism? These people have just correctly identified the biggest hurdle of their life, lack of validation, and have come to the conclusion that it can't be overcome as a sub 8 male.

fuck off

 

[tulasdanslos]

fuck off

Much argument, very insight


bottom text

This meme was brought to you by gang weed.

 

[Robtical]

I don't think you get the point, if you program an advanced AI with a "resist" function to put up some resistance against you trying to fuck it, you'll still know full well its just a robot and not actually resisting, its not feeling any pain, any fear, etc

I don't want a foid to resist me or be in fear when I'm fucking her. The robot having a submissive AI is what I want.

 

[Salustio]

Much argument, very insight

depressive realism ? Are you serious? No, it can't be serious.

Of course, the joos are behind clinical diagnosis of depression, sure. Fuck off

 

[Robtical]

Sexdolls is the ultimate final goal of true incels. Not patriarcucked return to the past, not beta rebellion.

Sexbots, removing cucked laws, and blackpilling non-chads is the beta rebellion.

 

[Salustio]

blackpilling non-chads is the beta rebellion.

Forced blackpilling. Through hard science and evidences. The new gen of uncucked individuals will not suffer anymore the society-inducted validation meme. Only beta rebellion we must enforce is the one involving massive doses of blackpill.

 

[Robtical]

Only beta rebellion we must enforce is the one involving massive doses of blackpill.

Then the cucked "metoo" laws will be removed and we can replace the cucks in power.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Regarding your argument: You are lying, you know it. Sexual urges, as shown by several theories (also the Maslow meme) is the only primal need you have, and you can satisfy it by just jerking off (porns or fantasy)

Yeah dude you are right, we have a primal need to play with our genitalia while watching others of ours species having sex, rather than actually having sex........ makes perfect sense, masturbation is definitely not just a cope

 

[Salustio]

Yeah dude you are right, we have a primal need to play with our genitalia while watching others of ours species having sex, rather than actually having sex........ makes perfect sense, masturbation is definitely not just a cope

You just have to eject semen. In a way or another. The Maslow's cope is fallacious because of its premises. Just look at the pyramid yourself. I don't like the Maslow meme, as it is an old surpassed theory that never had sense to begin with. But this stupid bullshit forum is full of people who post this meme. So I'm just trying to use something you have seen several times in front of your eyes.

The validationcuck thesis, revoles around the cope that without sex, you can die, because it's a basic need. Ok, let's seek information on the internet. This bullshit can be proved? Of course not.

So the cucks come here and show us the Maslow's hierarchy (because they are lazy and dumb), and pretend to tell something insightful, like a "gotcha" answer".

But it's bullshit, I'm alive even without sex, still not suffering all the major damages all these validationcucs are whining about. After having jerked off, that's all, I'm in peace and my mind is clear. I go fuck a prostitute, I'm OK, I'm not dying.

The truth is that that this forum if full of people who lie about their mental conditions, a lot of them are depressed and have clinical diagnosis, they are on drugs, they have mental ilnesses, and the blackpill is dangerous for them.

Just leave the blackpill to me, because I can handle it, without copes. If you are considering suicide, please do it, because I'm tired of validationcucks and their depression. Leave the blackpill to truly uncuckable people like me and kill yourself if you still want to deny reality and you think that pedistalizing women is the only purpose a man can have. The only logical conclusion to this reasoning is committing suicide.

 

[Deleted member 14805]

I don't want a foid to resist me or be in fear when I'm fucking her. The robot having a submissive AI is what I want.

 

[Anoncel123]

Better fapping than being a betacuck or escortcuck tbh

 

[roboticsmaxx]

JFL how

It would have to emulate, sweating, warmth, pleasure spasms, moans, etc to be as good as real sex, and even then you'd know full well its just a robot and not a woman submitting her body to you use, it isn't going to have the same appeal, it would just be expensive masturbation, one upside will be no risk of stds though, so I guess it wouldn't be all that bad of a purchase

The rate society is going they're actively trying to program us to find tubs of lard to be beautiful and hot, in other words they're rewiring us into become simps to Jabba the Hut. Fuck that, we might as well rewire our tastes to find aerodynamically-shaped plastics and silicone to be attractive. Turd Flinging monkey has had sex, and he vouches for the sexdoll laifu. Sweating, pleasure spasms, and other dirty human traits are totally unnecessary in a basic sexbot, and can be added in for those who really want those specific features. Because I keep saying again and again, your average married betabuxxer in a dead bedroom aint getting that shit either from his human companion.

Also so-called "love" is just release of oxytycin. You can get a similar effect from chocolates. It won't be long until we can just use direct neural stimulation.

Sexdolls is the ultimate final goal of true incels. Not patriarcucked return to the past, not beta rebellion. We want advanced robots, with a small AI, only to satisfy sexual urges. Please fuck off if you want to argue in favor of the validation meme. You're not blackpilled if you are still thinking about validation.

This. The single biggest factor of modern relationships today is hyperinflated hypergamy. Below average women getting attention and validation from a global pool of simps and cucks, which makes them super picky, and -- after having a taste of chad sportfucking -- becoming alpha widows who cannot be satisfied except with the best of the best.

Remove this validation from them. Remove this need for men to be validated by them so they won't turn into simps. We don't need to be validated by women. Ask the Wright brothers. Ask Isaac Newton. Ask Nicolas Tesla. They all went nope.jpg. That's why MGTOW is so into sexbots. Actually even better if you can kill your sexdrive and go total monk mode and shun anything related to women and seek spirituality in a monastery, but not all men can do that, so the next best thing we can recommend to recovering simps are sex dolls and sexbots.

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

There is a rule against foid worship, the fuck are you talking about?

People in a relationship in 2019 still have more sex than single people on median, only Chad can compete with their amount of sex while single.

Depends on the relationship. The number of dead bedrooms rising is a consequence of alpha widowing and betabuxxers getting trapped.

No, I will call you a soy-guzzling mangina, because that's what you are, giving money to a hooker and her pimp means you have abandoned all dignity.

This is actual major cope. Masturbation is never seen on the wild, our evolutionary cousins (chimps, bonobos) that masturbate only do so when in captivity. Humans are social animals and absolutely need sex for our mental well being. You can't just masturbate and call it a day, that's bluepilled.

Masturbation is never seen in the wild because rape is an option among our primate relatives. As is murder. Alphas get killed all the time. And you are coping if you think all women aren't whores, including your mother and (possible) future gf/wife. The love potential mates have for you is not real, because love is nothing more then a chemical reaction manipulating the bioelectrical computer in your head. If we can simulate that response from via drugs or technology, why shouldn't we?

To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with

Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)

Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy

Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that

>you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts.
Let me ask you a question. Is having sex with a person in a vegetative state similar to having sex with a doll? Will it satisfy the "domination" need?

The issue with this is your basic premise, that domination is needed to feel fulfilled sexually, is not true universally among all men. I've fucked prostitutes and such before, and I never felt the need to dominate them. I've never felt the need to humiliate them or play power games with them. I don't have this drive that you seem to have to want to dominate foids. The best experience I've had with a prostitute was after having sex, we cuddled for an hour naked, just feeling each other and sharing body heat while watching a movie. I'd rather prefer cooperation and mutualism than domination. Unfortunately, foids are biologically and socially programmed to want domination, so this is impossible.

A sexbot may not satisfy you or perhaps some more aggressive men, but it doesn't need to. All it needs to do is satisfy betabuxxers better than actual women can. That isn't a high bar to pass fortunately, and we will begin to see immediate changes in society at large. Most men just want to be appreciated by their foids at the end of the day. To not worry that they will be cheated on or are being led on and manipulated by a whore. That their children are theirs. That the attraction the foid has for them is real. It is a simple request that women cannot fill, but one which can be filled by AI easily once the computational power becomes great enough (quantum computers).

Technology is also advancing at a quick enough rate that we could conceivably have artificial wombs and mother AI by the time we decide to have children. So the evolutionary justification for females becomes obsolete. At that point, what is it that you are trying to dominate? You can have more, healthier offspring via artificial wombs than with natural foids. Chad might have 10 kids from different foids, but I have 10 from an artificial womb. From the perspective of evolution, is there a real difference between Chad and I?

I feel that your need to dominate is simply a reciprocation of the female need to be dominated tbh. I encourage you to at least try a sexbot when it comes out. I think females are an evolutionary handicap at this point and will not be around for much longer.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Just leave the blackpill to me, because I can handle it, without copes. If you are considering suicide, please do it, because I'm tired of validationcucks and their depression. Leave the blackpill to truly uncuckable people like me and kill yourself if you still want to deny reality and you think that pedistalizing women is the only purpose a man can have. The only logical conclusion to this reasoning is committing suicide.

Just leave reading to me, because your reading and comprehensions skills are complete trash, I half think English is your 2nd language with how badly you have interpreted this thread

Let me ask you a question. Is having sex with a person in a vegetative state similar to having sex with a doll? Will it satisfy the "domination" need?

Yes it would satisfy the domination need, but raping a person in a vegetative state (it would be rape not sex, lets be honest JFL), would be dominating, but they can't really react to anything you do now could they, so it would be somewhat boring to say the least

I've fucked prostitutes and such before, and I never felt the need to dominate them. I've never felt the need to humiliate them or play power games with them.

I don't think you read my post properly, by dominate I don't mean just extreme stuff like some BDSM shit, during sex a woman submits her body to your usage, you are dominating a woman by default by having sex with her, because she has to SUBMIT to your acts, sex is inherently about dominant and submissive roles

Remember where I said:

its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that

When I say dominance I don't mean just extreme and violent things, the act of dominating isn't just that, sex is inherently an act of submission for women (the penetrated), and an act of dominance for men (the penetrator). The feeling of someone submitting to you cannot be replaced by masturbation or sex bots, because something that doesn't have a consciousness cannot submit, its an object.

Are you seriously going to argue you vigorously pounding your loins into someone over and over until you release bodily excretions into and/or inside them, isn't a physically dominating act?

You can go ahead and make that argument, and that's where I stop arguing lol