BlkPillPres
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Posts
- 19,737
This is something that needs to be addressed, I'm seeing a lot of blue pilled posts against paying for sex, and the most frustrating part isn't their refusal, its the blatant contradiction in their arguments and their mindset, that female validation means more to them than sex, while at the same time speaking about women like they are lower than dirt, its the stupidity that is angering, these idiots can't see the obvious contradiction in their words, let me get to the point
Its completely contradictory to both acknowledge that women are basically instinct driven and illogical, and yet somehow value whether or not they admire you or think highly of you
Ask yourself, of what value is a woman's evaluation of you, when you SUPPOSEDLY do not value her as a person
How can you devalue women as an existence, speak of them as illogical, emotional, less intelligent, etc, while at the same time claiming that their evaluation of you is something that matters (do you see the obvious contradiction yet?)
THAT WOULD BE LIKE ME SAYING I HAVE A BROKEN MIRROR, YET I TRUST ITS ABILITY TO GIVE ME AN ACCURATE REFLECTION
One should only value the evaluation given by someone relative to how much they value the logical integrity of said person, in other words, if you truly believe everything the black pill says about women, then by valuing female validation, you are putting stake in the competency of a group of individuals, that you yourself deem as incompetent (OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION)
That's a huge contradiction, it doesn't make any sense, I seriously believe most of the guys saying this are posturing and they don't really think badly of women. They are coping and just calling them "bad names" so they can trick themselves (using mental gymnastics) into thinking that they don't care about women, so they don't feel powerless and trapped
These guys still have a "reverence" for women which is why they value their validation
Its completely contradictory to both acknowledge that women are basically instinct driven and illogical, and yet somehow value whether or not they admire you or think highly of you
Ask yourself, of what value is a woman's evaluation of you, when you SUPPOSEDLY do not value her as a person
How can you devalue women as an existence, speak of them as illogical, emotional, less intelligent, etc, while at the same time claiming that their evaluation of you is something that matters (do you see the obvious contradiction yet?)
THAT WOULD BE LIKE ME SAYING I HAVE A BROKEN MIRROR, YET I TRUST ITS ABILITY TO GIVE ME AN ACCURATE REFLECTION
One should only value the evaluation given by someone relative to how much they value the logical integrity of said person, in other words, if you truly believe everything the black pill says about women, then by valuing female validation, you are putting stake in the competency of a group of individuals, that you yourself deem as incompetent (OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION)
That's a huge contradiction, it doesn't make any sense, I seriously believe most of the guys saying this are posturing and they don't really think badly of women. They are coping and just calling them "bad names" so they can trick themselves (using mental gymnastics) into thinking that they don't care about women, so they don't feel powerless and trapped
These guys still have a "reverence" for women which is why they value their validation
Last edited: