I largely concur with OP. Thing I disagree with most, though, is one of the main points in this:
IQ, just like conscientiousness, isn't a meme. These are some of the most important factors that correlate with monetary success. Doctors, lawyers, engineers, major business owners, etc. tend towards having IQs that are at least above average. For example, I suspect that doctors would usually have IQs in the 120s to 140s range.
Obviously, being introverted and neurotic could hinder one's self, but this largely applies if one picks a job that involves lots of socialisation. One doesn't need to be low inhib and happy to be a radiologist.
My point isn't that IQ doesn't make a difference, my point is if you have an average IQ, then you have
AN AVERAGE IQ, so how can you use that as an excuse as though there aren't other people with average IQ's that own businesses or became rich
Also when I say its a meme, it only makes a difference in "the working world", you don't need a high IQ to crime max, to sell drugs, etc, IQ only matters if you plan on playing by the rules society laid out to begin with
Advanced animals, but still animals
Yes, and unlike other animals, rational
Your own thread was written in motivation by an emotion (Rage) which is not a rational thought but resides in the inherently irrational realm of emotions
1. Who decided that, you've been watching too many movies, a lot of good decisions are made through anger, anger doesn't mean out of control, anger just means you are strongly influenced by something you view in a negative way
Not all "rage" is "Hulk Rage"
I think its a cliche false premise to classify all acts of violence due to anger as "crazed" and all thoughts under anger as "irrational", as though nobody in the history of existence has used anger as their drive and motivation, and made rational decisions while under its influence
2. Red herring, if I had written this while not "enraged" and indicated no feelings of such, you still wouldn't agree with it, so you are basically stating a non-point as if you disagree with the post for that reason, you'd disagree regardless
If someone shoots your best friend for his wallet, whether they did it to feed their family or to buy a gold chain, you'd disagree with it (assuming you are on good terms lol), its a red herring to pretend as if under certain circumstances you'd be alright with said friend being shot
Why would you rationally be enraged at something other people do that doesn't affect you directly in any way?)
Things disgust you whether they are within your vicinity or not, also please see the irony in an incel saying this, there are a lot of things taking place in normies lives that don't affect us directly that we are enraged at
It literally cant be done, going to prison = life automatically over. If it were legal i would he doing it a long ago.
Aren't you assuming you getting caught is a foregone conclusion?