It's Over Gynocentrism is out of control

[Giracel]

I am mentioning this again because people need to understand the extent of what is actually going on. There are literally banners overhead threatening LEGAL ATTACKS for merely approaching foids.

This post was about advertising I saw for a foid attorney with the singular purpose of prosecuting whatever counts as "harassment" today: https://incels.is/threads/specialty-law-practice-idea.878535/

 

[SubhumanOldcel]

Always was, people are just more aware of it now.

 

[nihilum]

End feminism and abolish women’s rights to stop gynocentrism.

 

[parbate2025]

Put smelly fat lesbian feminists in cages

 

[SmhChan]

Always was, people are just more aware of it now.

That's the only silver lining. So much documented material on gynocracy that you can publish book after book. Then again, most men's reaction is just more faggoted. Just looksmax bro, to court a bottom-of-the-barrel whore.

 

[SmhChan]

End feminism and abolish women’s rights to stop gynocentrism.

That is going to do fuck-all.

 

[nihilum]

That is going to do fuck-all.

It will solve the serious demographic/fertility crisis in Europe.

 

[NukeGynocentrism]

That is going to do fuck-all.

How so?

If you want to end gynocentrism in its entirety (or close to it), then consider replacing the XX chromosome with female androids possessing synthetic wombs -- effectively making biological women obsolete.

This won’t be a possibility until another century or two.

 

[Giracel]

replacing the XX chromosome

Unlikely…

 

[SmhChan]

It will end the serious demographic crisis in Europe.

That is just delusion. Even if some incel dictator came into power tomorrow in the Western World and “ended feminism”, men are so simp-wired that at a personal level, foids would still have power over men. That dictatorship wouldn’t even last a year. Men themselves would overthrow that shit.
You need to totally re-educate men on foids, and fill their minds with a level of hatred towards foids for a start.

 

[nihilum]

You need to totally re-educate men on foids.

We need to do that.

 

[Giracel]

That is just delusion.

One factor of the demographic crisis that I feel gets overlooked is the high age of marriage. It's not simply "foid hate man, no sex, no kids." Yes, there are 4B-type foids but marriage is still happening, just too late. It's hard to know exactly why since there's a lot at play, including economic constraints. But opposing feminism could only be a benefit across the board.

 

[SmhChan]

How so?

If you want to end gynocentrism in its entirety (or close to it), then consider replacing the XX chromosome with female androids possessing synthetic wombs -- effectively making biological women obsolete.

This won’t be a possibility until another century or two.

He talked about "ending feminism and taking away foid rights." Those are delusional right-wing-coded talking points. I’m all for making foids obsolete, but I’m not very emotionally invested in the idea of artificial wombs. I believe that it’s not viable, but that might have to do with my lack of knowledge in that field.
Regardless, right now, men should work towards reducing foids to glorified wombs to keep the human race (and their own race) going.

 

[nihilum]

Men should work towards reducing foids to glorified wombs to keep the human race (and their own race) going.

So ending feminism.

 

[nihilum]

One factor of the demographic crisis that I feel gets overlooked is the high age of marriage.

That’s literally because of feminism.

 

[Morbilius]

That is just delusion. Even if some incel dictator came into power tomorrow in the Western World and “ended feminism”, men are so simp-wired that at a personal level, foids would still have power over men. That dictatorship wouldn’t even last a year. Men themselves would overthrow that shit.
You need to totally re-educate men on foids, and fill their minds with a level of hatred towards foids for a start.

Never gonna happen the system is designed around foids being a protected class if men started waking up and hating foids the system would collapse, we're a minority for a reason.

 

[nihilum]

Never gonna happen the system is designed around foids being a protected class if men started waking up and hating foids the system would collapse, we're a minority for a reason.

We need to overthrow the capitalist-feminist system and replace it with a traditionalist socialist pan-European nationalist anti-feminist new order in Europe.

 

[Giracel]

That’s literally because of feminism.

But also economics. They can't breed if they can't afford it.

 

[imlame]

But also economics. They can't breed if they can't afford it.

 

[Giracel]

traditionalist socialist pan-European

Wouldn't go over well in post-Soviet and bloc satellite states I'm afraid

 

[nihilum]

But also economics. They can't breed if they can't afford it.

That’s why we need both socialism and radical anti-feminism.

 

[SmhChan]

One factor of the demographic crisis that I feel gets overlooked is the high age of marriage. It's not simply "foid hate man, no sex, no kids." Yes, there are 4B-type foids but marriage is still happening, just too late. It's hard to know exactly why since there's a lot at play, including economic constraints. But opposing feminism could only be a benefit across the board.

The current society is fueled by extreme levels of hedonism and consumerism. Economic constraints being a cause is a huge cope (not a slight against you). People were having kids even 100 years ago, while they were 100x worse off economically. Besides, if you’re married, you literally pay less tax in a lot of countries.
The only reason foids are marrying late is that by their 30s, they are done with taking 1000s of dicks in their holes, and they need a new experience, and that is marriage. Marriage is an aesthetic for them since modern marriages barely last a decade.
Foids don’t really “hate” men. Their unhinged takes on how men should be treated in society are them showing men their place in society. Men are simply seen as slaves by the foid class, and when men start to “get ideas,” foids combat it with more extreme levels of gynocentrism that we are seeing (you might have noticed gynocentrism has ramped up significantly in the last 2 decades).

 

[Giracel]

That’s why we need both socialism and radical anti-feminism.

Achieving that coexistence would be a real struggle given your average rad fem thinks communism is so wonderful

 

[nihilum]

The current society is fueled by extreme levels of hedonism and consumerism. Economic constraints being a cause is a huge cope (not a slight against you). People were having kids even 100 years ago, while they were 100x worse off economically. Besides, if you’re married, you literally pay less tax in a lot of countries.
The only reason foids are marrying late is that by their 30s, they are done with taking 1000s of dicks in their holes, and they need a new experience, and that is marriage. Marriage is an aesthetic for them since modern marriages barely last a decade.
Foids don’t really “hate” men. Their unhinged takes on how men should be treated in society are them showing men their place in society. Men are simply seen as slaves by the foid class, and when men start to “get ideas,” foids combat it with more extreme levels of gynocentrism that we are seeing (you might have noticed gynocentrism has ramped up significantly in the last 2 decades).

Trvth Nvke

 

[nihilum]

The current society is fueled by extreme levels of hedonism and consumerism. Economic constraints being a cause is a huge cope (not a slight against you). People were having kids even 100 years ago, while they were 100x worse off economically.

 

[nihilum]

View attachment 1740191

Achieving that coexistence would be a real struggle given your average rad fem thinks communism is so wonderful

Stalin (authoritarian communist) was anti-feminist.

Proudhon (libertarian communist) was anti-feminist too.

 

[Giracel]

The current society is fueled by extreme levels of hedonism and consumerism. Economic constraints being a cause is a huge cope (not a slight against you). People were having kids even 100 years ago, while they were 100x worse off economically. Besides, if you’re married, you literally pay less tax in a lot of countries.
The only reason foids are marrying late is that by their 30s, they are done with taking 1000s of dicks in their holes, and they need a new experience, and that is marriage. Marriage is an aesthetic for them since modern marriages barely last a decade.
Foids don’t really “hate” men. Their unhinged takes on how men should be treated in society are them showing men their place in society. Men are simply seen as slaves by the foid class, and when men start to “get ideas,” foids combat it with more extreme levels of gynocentrism that we are seeing (you might have noticed gynocentrism has ramped up significantly in the last 2 decades).

I guess the econ argument does have issues. Even today we see 50 IQ subsaharan africans in abject poverty breeding completely out of control (that we foolishly subsidize with Western aid). This is a good assessment.

Those "last 2 decades" unfortunately were the majority of my life. '00 – '05 were destroyed by timing.

 

[nihilum]

View attachment 1740191

Achieving that coexistence would be a real struggle given your average rad fem thinks communism is so wonderful

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon had staunchly patriarchal and anti-feminist views. He firmly believed in traditional gender roles and the inherent inferiority of women in society.

 

[SmhChan]

Never gonna happen the system is designed around foids being a protected class if men started waking up and hating foids the system would collapse, we're a minority for a reason.

JoinedMar 23, 2026

Who's "we?" You’re closer to normies than you’re to me. If you have been paying any attention, you might have noticed normies have been seething against foids and their gynocracy for quite a while now. They simply lack the conviction to do something about it because they cannot rationalize their hatred of foids. So, they ended up channelling that hatred towards ethnic groups.

 

[Giracel]

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon had staunchly patriarchal and anti-feminist views. He firmly believed in traditional gender roles and the inherent inferiority of women in society.

To be honest, I haven't looked beneath the veneer of modern gay + feminist communism to see what early socialists actually believed. I read a bit of Marx in sociology 101 but I don't recall anything about gender roles from that. What comes to mind when I hear "socialist" is muslims, transgenders, rad fems… basically everything that was shoved into my face by the zeitgeist of the Palestine protests.

 

[nihilum]

JoinedMar 23, 2026

Who's "we?" You’re closer to normies than you’re to me. If you have been paying any attention, you might have noticed normies have been seething against foids and their gynocracy for quite a while now. They simply lack the conviction to do something about it because they cannot rationalize their hatred of foids. So, they ended up channelling that hatred towards ethnic groups.

feminism is responsible for the demographic/fertility crisis of white people in Europe.

 

[Morbilius]

JoinedMar 23, 2026

Who's "we?" You’re closer to normies than you’re to me. If you have been paying any attention, you might have noticed normies have been seething against foids and their gynocracy for quite a while now. They simply lack the conviction to do something about it because they cannot rationalize their hatred of foids. So, they ended up channelling that hatred towards ethnic groups.

Wtf does me joining just a few months ago have to do with anything? Normies don't seethe about shit, they're your enemy if you truly believe they're on your side you're delusional. I'll never defend normies with anything yet you seem to, no normies will worship foids and will never fault them for anything.

 

[nihilum]

To be honest, I haven't looked beneath the veneer of modern gay + feminist communism to see what early socialists actually believed. I read a bit of Marx in sociology 101 but I don't recall anything about gender roles from that. What comes to mind when I hear "socialist" is muslims, transgenders, rad fems… basically everything that was shoved into my face by the zeitgeist of the Palestine protests.

Anti-feminism
Proudhon expressed strongly patriarchal views on women's nature and their proper role in the family and society at large. In his Carnets (Notebooks), unpublished until the 1960s, Proudhon maintained that a woman's choice was to be "courtesan or housekeeper". To a woman, a man is "a father, a chief, a master: above all, a master". His justification for patriarchy was men's assumed greater physical strength, and he recommended that men use this strength to subordinate women, saying that "[a] woman does not at all hate being used with violence, indeed even being violated". In her study of Gustave Courbet, who painted the portrait of Proudhon and His Children (1865), art historian Linda Nochlin points out that alongside his early articulations of anarchism Proudhon also wrote La Pornocratie ou les femmes dans les temps modernes, described as "the most consistent anti-feminist tract of its time, or perhaps, any other" and which "raises all the main issues about woman's position in society and her sexuality with a paranoid intensity unmatched in any other text"

 

[nihilum]

Wtf does me joining just a few months ago have to do with anything? Normies don't seethe about shit, they're your enemy if you truly believe they're on your side you're delusional. I'll never defend normies with anything yet you seem to, no normies will worship foids and will never fault them for anything.

feminists and neoliberals are my enemy.

 

[juggmymaxilla]

That is just delusion. Even if some incel dictator came into power tomorrow in the Western World and “ended feminism”, men are so simp-wired that at a personal level, foids would still have power over men. That dictatorship wouldn’t even last a year. Men themselves would overthrow that shit.
You need to totally re-educate men on foids, and fill their minds with a level of hatred towards foids for a start.

You’re forgetting what the west was before the 19th amendment. Giving women the right to vote was the final step in tipping the scale in their favor, after which gynocentrism went rampant. Look at countries where women still play their trad role of birth-giver/caretaker, their society is at a much better balance.

 

[nihilum]

You’re forgetting what the west was before the 19th amendment. Giving women the right to vote was the final step in tipping the scale in their favor, after which gynocentrism went rampant. Look at countries where women still play their trad role of birth-giver/caretaker, their society is at a much better balance.

We have to abolish women’s rights to save the West.

 

[NukeGynocentrism]

That is just delusion. Even if some incel dictator came into power tomorrow in the Western World and “ended feminism”, men are so simp-wired that at a personal level, foids would still have power over men. That dictatorship wouldn’t even last a year. Men themselves would overthrow that shit.

He talked about "ending feminism and taking away foid rights." Those are delusional right-wing-coded talking points.

An incel dictator would obviously be overthrown, and an incel uprising is indeed a delusion; however, that was never quite the argument.

The common proposition is that it would be a nationalist coalition taking power, not disorganized incels. One that reverses "progressive" policies and shifts the culture, provided it seeks to actually dismantle the current system. More accurately, the system would already be collapsing, with said coalition acting as the final nail in the coffin. This would occur in the context of a power vacuum -- a fragmenting society characterized by deteriorating infrastructure, worse social tensions, and demographic collapse when we’re both old fucks. The point is that this decay is unlikely to be permanent.

In my eyes, the most realistic chance of success lies in creating a male-focused, nationalist right-wing parallel society -- communes and towns with their own strictly reactionary institutions and traditional hierarchies. As these organizations inevitably grow, they would soon increase in relevance and influence.

I say nationalist as there are no race-blind, anti-feminist groups that seriously pose a threat to the system. Nationalist groups fitting these criteria exist throughout Western countries, most notably in the U.S. in terms of size and the theorized goal I stated earlier.

Anti-feminism in this hypothetical would not be done in the way Afghans do it, but it would be a lot better than what we have now with room for improvement.