Yeah I would just lawyer up and sell it instantly, she would take half the money anyway because courts are cucked, why would I stay there when the outcome is already known.
Blackpill Guy does a DNA test and finds out his Dad is a random chad his Mum fucked on holiday.
That isn't how the justice system, or society, work in practice. Blame isn't infinite, usually. It's shared out. Look at Yankland's criminal justice system, where one person, often, confesses and blames the other person, in exchange for a light sentence. We live in reality, not your fantasies. Watch some crime cases and observe how consistently women blame men to exonerate themselves or minimise their crimes.
A court likely wouldn't let you sell a house from under a Mother and child. You'd stay there because it's YOUR house. Leaving to live in your car or a dingy flat for months on end is cucked af.
Yeah, this man put all his resources into raising this single child and it wasn't even his and he never knew until he was an old man. The whore was like, "didn't want to upset your dad," more like she didn't want to face the consequences for her infidelity.
Which justice system? The modern western one? That's kind of the problem at hand. I'm describing an ancient justice system that actually worked. So no, that is how A justice system works.
That's my line. My law worked for thousands of years. Western law has been failing for only a few centuries.
This is what happens when the education system fails to teach history. People have no perspective.
There's never been a criminal justice system, or society, that has existed, which has remotely held women accountable for their actions commensurate to men. No remotely civilised one anyway. The dynamic I'm describing has permeated every notable society that has ever existed.
Wrong. Read Deuteronomy.
"I define all justice systems that hold women accountable as uncivilized." Good job outing yourself, simp.
Every civilized* society, where civilized means gynocratic.
Read a work of fiction?
None of the uncivilised ones do either. The less civilised, usually the bigger simps. Prioritising the welfare of females is a core part of our evolutionary biology. More "traditional" countries in the world today are the biggest simps. Femicide laws, male-only conscription and national service, gaping life expectancy between the sexes (10 years in Russia), fully celebrated National Women's Days, and so on. The harsher a society, the more men suffer, the more women are protected.
No, "civilised" (that's how you spell it in English) means not living in mud huts and dying of smallpox at 25.
This brings me back to that time when my coworker (gen. x, married, father of 2) said that there was a white couple living in republic of south africa and they had a black child and he said like "It came to the parents that mother side had an ancestor who was black".
My reaction in brain that time:
My face:
Guys tell me, how likely it is that if your ancestor was a Tyrone and your mom is white it happened that you are black? xdddd
My reaction in brain that time:
My face:
Guys tell me, how likely it is that if your ancestor was a Tyrone and your mom is white it happened that you are black? xdddd
I would literally slit my mom's throat like in my avi. Luckily me and my father are like twins. All the people tell me that I look like my father.
Couldn't be more wrong. Remember, the modern """civilized""" west lets women stab men and gives them house arrest, because God forbid they might have to drop out of medical school for attempted murder. Every sexual crime a woman is capable of committing has been made legal, with the exception of pedophilia, which women are OCCASIONALLY punished for. Meanwhile, apart from executing adulteresses, the law of Moses...
- executes non-virgin women who try to get married
- dismembers women who strike a man in the balls
- puts women in literal period jail
- executes women for having sex with animals
Westerners have a very bad habit of writing their simping into the past. Every civilization is obligated to secure the survival of its women, or it dies out. But there is a great distance between protecting women from wild animals and arbitrary violence, and being unable to hold them to account for their transgressions. All accounts of the distant past point to women being held harshly to account for their transgressions, because women's transgressions are particularly destructive to social order.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kswEUZ246Gk
She had a holiday "romance" with a guy, whose name she thinks might be "Carlos".
Similar situation to my grandmother, did a DNA test and found out her father is another person. Grandmothers sister also did one of these tests and also found out her stepdad was her actual dad. Shit hurts families
All of this is, relatively, more true in more traditional societies.
And what punishments do men receive? Much, much worse ones. As well as the same ones (when applicable), eg. men are also killed for having sex with animals. And how do you think that neutral law plays out in practice? In such a society, where both men and women are executed for fucking a dog, are more men or more women killed? Our western laws today are generally written to be gender-neutral, do you think they are? Who is sent into war in this society? Who does all the dangerous and physically hard jobs? Who has to pay for everything? And how viciously are these expectations enforced?Meanwhile, apart from executing adulteresses, the law of Moses...
- executes non-virgin women who try to get married
- dismembers women who strike a man in the balls
- puts women in literal period jail
- executes women for having sex with animals
Female accountability, relative to men, seems to be increasing.
It's enraging. I'm glad I know my Dad is my Dad, we have too many distinctly similar characteristics.
Well the cuck offspring seems to be a faggot anyways so does it really matter?
Id say it will get worse with Gen Z and due to dating apps. Lots and Lots of Tinder Bastard kids coming up.
Are chad genes recessive?
It's clear at this point that you have no historical knowledge. So rather than dealing with your badly-chosen questions, I'll just answer with ancient Judean story time.All of this is, relatively, more true in more traditional societies.
And what punishments do men receive? Much, much worse ones. As well as the same ones (when applicable), eg. men are also killed for having sex with animals. And how do you think that neutral law plays out in practice? In such a society, where both men and women are executed for fucking a dog, are more men or more women killed? Our western laws today are generally written to be gender-neutral, do you think they are? Who is sent into war in this society? Who does all the dangerous and physically hard jobs? Who has to pay for everything? And how viciously are these expectations enforced?
Female accountability, relative to men, seems to be increasing.
If you marry a girl, go to fuck her, and she's not a virgin, and you complain about it, she gets executed for trying to defraud you. There is no concept of male virginity. This is a one-way street.
But, if you lied about her not being a virgin, you will be whipped in the town square. What was that about men getting punished worse? Misplaced western cynicism. You should be that cynical about the west, but don't universalize western problems.
Nothing new here. Notice, the man's crime is fucking another man's wife, not cheating on his own wife. A single man can commit adultery. A married man having sex with an unmarried woman is not adultery. It's actually not even a crime.
Basically says that a woman's duty to be faithful (and men's duty not to adulter) begins at betrothal. Also it's not rape if she doesn't scream.
An exception is made for being outside the city, i.e., in the wilderness. Even if she screams, nobody could come and help her, so it's assumed to be rape, and she is spared execution. Of course the marriage is going to get called off.
The notorious "biblical rape" law. If she's a virgin and not betrothed or married, and a man fucks her, with consent or by force, he can right his wrong by marrying her under unfavorable conditions. Specifically, he can't freely divorce her. But if she commits adultery, she gets executed, so it's not like she has free rein.
Last edited:
Bible stories aren't history.
Bible stories aren't history.
You don't understand "context", do you? Men being punished worse doesn't mean in every individual scenario. It means overall. Hand-picking rare (and mythical) examples of the opposite doesn't disprove this fact. You sound like a feminist who thinks they're proving "patriarchy" exists by hand-picking rare examples where men have advantages.
This is my final reply because I'm tired of providing evidence and receiving seethe and speculation. You're wrong. A smart person would admit it. That means you're stupid on top of that. My condolences that you're emotionally attached to the shittiest and most man-hating culture that ever existed. No, other cultures are not the same. Cry about it.
Would you prefer Hammurabi's code of laws? It's a similar code of laws, from the same region, without the religious aspect that you're allergic to.
Do you even know what context means? This entire back-and-forth has been you failing to wrap your head around there existing a context other than the western one.
Hand-picking? Go pull gynocentric laws out of my sources. I'll see you in the afterlife, because you won't find any
You sound like a retard who takes a bigger L for refusing to take a smaller L. I hope you learned something, but I know you didn't.
Even, when he was lighter as a kid, he was still clearly mixed. I wonder whe he only noticed when someone called him mixed@DarkStarDown another white american man cucked by the eternal negro
How can copers deny JBB anymore?
Fictional bible stories aren't "evidence", goyim.
Yep, for sure you have a valid point here. The percentage will skyrocket and lots of men will raise a bastardchild without knowing... Fucking disgusting is what it is.
And paternity tests should be mandatory at birth. There are no good arguments against it. Paternity fraud hurts fathers, children, families and society at large.
W
That percentage seems low. I read a study on this once where they concluded 8%.
Think it differs alot depending on which country they're conducting the research in. The study I read is only based on the swedish population and earlier studies here have also showed even higher numbers but now they had a new method where they checked the bloodtype or something and then got this results. Think some really old studies worldwide estimated 20-30% but those I don't think is too reliable and prefer to check more up to date studies so that people can't downtalk the problem here blaming unreliable shitty studies. But even though it's "only" 2% (or maybe more depending on country/how you measure it) I mean it's still a HUGE problem when you put that in numbers, so it's still a massive problem for hundreds of thousands of kids growing up with a cheating whore mom.
Similar threads
Blackpill
N3on was already rich cause of his dad was famous and also made a lot of money in real estate
- Justice
- Inceldom Discussion
opioidcel
Users who are viewing this thread
