JFL "Greedy capitalists created inceldom" - Chronically retarded redditor

[Misogynist Vegeta]

Oh, I didn't know you were in with the jewish elite @Master damn. On serious note it's actually hilarious how the average left wing redditard has to make literally everything about how capitalism is bad and stuff. Many users here are Neets collecting government neet buxs from governments who are left wing and it hasn't changed the behavior of women towards incels. Women who are socialists don't even do dating with their socialist values, they don't give access to sex to the less fortunate ugly men, they don't even try help them at all. So no inceldom has nothing to do with capitalism, It doesn't matter what system we were under incels would still exist because of cultural behavior of women, Cultural behavior that exists in socialist countries like cuba and capitalist countries like america.

I could even make the argument that a truly capitalist system is better for incels than a socialist one because at the very least incels could get good at capitalist through investments and use that to escape the life they live prehaps even using the money they get to invest in the future solution to inceldom in what is the AI android companion, Let us not forget that modern day socialists in the west absolutely hate AI and will destroy it's chances of progressing to that point if they ever get in power.

 

[4sez]

Can we start massacring Redditors? I swear, they have to be the biggest retards that have ever existed alongside Tumblr users.
( in-game, of course )

 

[Ambatukam Alone]

I'm at my like 8th beer, someone summarize that shit?

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

I'm at my like 8th beer, someone summarize that shit?

Oligarchs (Extremely rich people who have power of the government, @Master is that powerful?) created inceldom and the redpill to distract you from the have the power they have over you. That's his argument, it's really retarded.

 

[Ambatukam Alone]

Oligarchs (Extremely rich people who have power of the government, @Master is that powerful?) created inceldom and the redpill to distract you from the have the power they have over you. That's his argument, it's really retarded.

Shiet. Well, what I'm supposed to do about that?

 

[Grodd]

Making up outlandish conspiracies instead of blaming the actual culprit which is foids jfl.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

jfl where is it from

 

[ToBurble&Pine]

Anything but to blame foids

 

[Hoodpreet]

Can we start massacring Redditors? I swear, they have to be the biggest retards that have ever existed alongside Tumblr users.
( in-game, of course )

I really hate these cunts and cannot see them as human whatsoever. They don’t even deserve a new chip in their brains, they deserve to be thrown directly into incinerators

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

I really hate these cunts and cannot see them as human whatsoever. They don’t even deserve a new chip in their brains, they deserve to be thrown directly into incinerators

That's a waste! They should be doing manual labor for 12 hours a day. An ironic punishment for a group of people who want a system that would lead to that.

 

[superpsycho]

example #36822728272827 of redditors misunderstanding inceldom and trying to conflate it with the redpill

 

[fokusin]

Anything but to blame foids

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

This is why I don't speak to marxists these days. They did shit like this 24/7. "muh capitalism" isn't the reason behind why your back hurts, retard.

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Modern inceldom is caused by capitalism but not in the way nor the proportions this redditor sees it.

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

Modern inceldom is caused by capitalism but not in the way nor the proportions this redditor sees it.

It's just like in Whatever.

Sex operates on an economy, just like the financial one. There are winners and there are losers. Some win in one and lose in the other, some win in both, some lose in the both. C'est ainsi.

 

[LeFrenchCel]

It's just like in Whatever.

Sex operates on an economy, just like the financial one. There are winners and there are losers. Some win in one and lose in the other, some win in both, some lose in the both. C'est ainsi.

 

[monkawdeluxe]

Oh, I didn't know you were in with the jewish elite @ @Master damn. On serious note it's actually hilarious how the average left wing redditard has to make literally everything about how capitalism is bad and stuff. Many users here are Neets collecting government neet buxs from governments who are left wing and it hasn't changed the behavior of women towards incels. Women who are socialists don't even do dating with their socialist values, they don't give access to sex to the less fortunate ugly men, they don't even try help them at all. So no inceldom has nothing to do with capitalism, It doesn't matter what system we were under incels would still exist because of cultural behavior of women, Cultural behavior that exists in socialist countries like cuba and capitalist countries like america.

I could even make the argument that a truly capitalist system is better for incels than a socialist one because at the very least incels could get good at capitalist through investments and use that to escape the life they live prehaps even using the money they get to invest in the future solution to inceldom in what is the AI android companion, Let us not forget that modern day socialists in the west absolutely hate AI and will destroy it's chances of progressing to that point if they ever get in power.



Security is always my main concern when trying out a new automated broker. Before you deposit any euros, make sure you go through the official Stuwen Opulex login https://stuwen-opulex.online to ensure your personal data is protected by military-grade encryption. The onboarding process is very straightforward, and their compliance with European banking standards makes withdrawals to local bank accounts incredibly smooth.

The main flaw in applying economic theories to dating is treating intimacy like a physical resource or currency. Whether under capitalism or socialism, affection and consent are based on individual choice, not state distribution or market forces. No political system is ever going to mandate mutual attraction or "redistribute" relationships like wealth.

However, your point about the tech market driving AI development is entirely accurate. Capitalist investment is exactly what is rapidly advancing AI companions right now. Regardless of political pushback, that sector is growing fast and will likely become a highly customized alternative for people seeking connection outside of traditional social dynamics.

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

There are incels in the animals kingdom like with Elephant seals which means inceldom predates capitalism or humans for that matter. Reddit always has the most retarded takes imaginable.
And the New Left was a CIA funded project which means leftoids are just useful idiots and controlled opposition for the same people that they claim to hate.

 

[NepNep]

Marxists being retarded = water, they could step on some random mutt's shit and blame Rockefeller and late capitalism

 

[Risky2Risky]

View attachment 1701656

Oh, I didn't know you were in with the jewish elite @Master damn. On serious note it's actually hilarious how the average left wing redditard has to make literally everything about how capitalism is bad and stuff. Many users here are Neets collecting government neet buxs from governments who are left wing and it hasn't changed the behavior of women towards incels. Women who are socialists don't even do dating with their socialist values, they don't give access to sex to the less fortunate ugly men, they don't even try help them at all. So no inceldom has nothing to do with capitalism, It doesn't matter what system we were under incels would still exist because of cultural behavior of women, Cultural behavior that exists in socialist countries like cuba and capitalist countries like america.

I could even make the argument that a truly capitalist system is better for incels than a socialist one because at the very least incels could get good at capitalist through investments and use that to escape the life they live prehaps even using the money they get to invest in the future solution to inceldom in what is the AI android companion, Let us not forget that modern day socialists in the west absolutely hate AI and will destroy it's chances of progressing to that point if they ever get in power.

I’m red pilled asf and against capitalism completely jfl

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

The main flaw in applying economic theories to dating is treating intimacy like a physical resource or currency. Whether under capitalism or socialism, affection and consent are based on individual choice, not state distribution or market forces. No political system is ever going to mandate mutual attraction or "redistribute" relationships like wealth.

Economics is the study of scarcity, and nothing is more scarce for the average man right now than genuine attraction. By removing the social regulations of the past (like enforced monogamy, traditional marriage, reduced female freedom and economic power, as well as religion), we transitioned from a regulated economy to a Laissez-faire sexual market; that is the sexually liberal market, which has truly established itself with the sexual revolution. In a completely free market, monopolies always form. A small percentage of men hoard the vast majority of female attention, leaving the rest of the market in a permanent recession. Importantly, women themselves are also actors within this market, who are also highly privileged and have an abundance of low-demand options while pursuing the high-demand Chad.

Of course, you cannot "mandate attraction," per se, but it is certainly possible to regulate the dating market in the very same manner every other market can be regulated. In fact, it is a societal imperative to regulate such a market in the face of great inequality and risk to sociosexual dynamics, as it directly affects many other areas within society — being one of the most fundamental aspects of a society overall.

 

[SmhChan]

Economics is the study of scarcity, and nothing is more scarce for the average man right now than genuine attraction. By removing the social regulations of the past (like enforced monogamy, traditional marriage, reduced female freedom and economic power, as well as religion), we transitioned from a regulated economy to a Laissez-faire sexual market; that is the sexually liberal market, which has truly established itself with the sexual revolution. In a completely free market, monopolies always form. A small percentage of men hoard the vast majority of female attention, leaving the rest of the market in a permanent recession. Importantly, women themselves are also actors within this market, who are also highly privileged and have an abundance of low-demand options while pursuing the high-demand Chad.

Of course, you cannot "mandate attraction," per se, but it is certainly possible to regulate the dating market in the very same manner every other market can be regulated. In fact, it is a societal imperative to regulate such a market in the face of great inequality and risk to sociosexual dynamics, as it directly affects many other areas within society — being one of the most fundamental aspects of a society overall.

I swear Gen Z and Millennials are brainrotted on "muh intimacy from foids." Like, average men in the past didn't give a fuck about genuine intimacy from foids. Ironically, back then, men opened up to foids in private much more frequently without any fear of judgment since the power dynamic was more balanced.
Any guy past 20 who is still hung up on this Shakespearean idea of romance is a grade-A moron. Even the performative chads like Clavicular, who show off their “harems” on the internet, are only scoring the lowest of the low clout-chasing trash.

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

Economics is the study of scarcity, and nothing is more scarce for the average man right now than genuine attraction. By removing the social regulations of the past (like enforced monogamy, traditional marriage, reduced female freedom and economic power, as well as religion), we transitioned from a regulated economy to a Laissez-faire sexual market; that is the sexually liberal market, which has truly established itself with the sexual revolution. In a completely free market, monopolies always form. A small percentage of men hoard the vast majority of female attention, leaving the rest of the market in a permanent recession. Importantly, women themselves are also actors within this market, who are also highly privileged and have an abundance of low-demand options while pursuing the high-demand Chad.

Of course, you cannot "mandate attraction," per se, but it is certainly possible to regulate the dating market in the very same manner every other market can be regulated. In fact, it is a societal imperative to regulate such a market in the face of great inequality and risk to sociosexual dynamics, as it directly affects many other areas within society — being one of the most fundamental aspects of a society overall.

The great irony of this is that the average foid these days leans to the left, that absolutely abhor the idea of a person making their own wealth and choosing to keep it for themselves instead of giving it back to the community, Whether or not the more wealthy people actually worked hard to earn their wealth and whether or not the people who are receiving this wealth truly deserve it doesn't matter to them as they are often fueled by jealousy of what they themselves don't have but when they are the ones who have thinks that others don't have they wish to keep it, Which isn't surprising because a significant amount of socialists are socialists until they are the ones having their wealth garnished.

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

Any guy past 20 who is still hung up on this Shakespearean idea of romance is a grade-A moron.

I know I'm delusional, but let a man dream we don't have much else to believe in.

 

[The Judge]

Ironically, you could very easily paint our frustrations with a Marxist brush.

We are the disenfranchised, the ones left behind in a hyper-competitive market. Why should only attractive men have access to romantic relationships? Why do some men have hundreds of partners, whilst others live and die completely alone?

 

[Caichan]

I created the movement

 

[MentalistKebab]

Socialists are retards who try to blame everything on capitalism.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

The great irony of this is that the average foid these days leans to the left, that absolutely abhor the idea of a person making their own wealth and choosing to keep it for themselves instead of giving it back to the community, Whether or not the more wealthy people actually worked hard to earn their wealth and whether or not the people who are receiving this wealth truly deserve it doesn't matter to them as they are often fueled by jealousy of what they themselves don't have but when they are the ones who have thinks that others don't have they wish to keep it, Which isn't surprising because a significant amount of socialists are socialists until they are the ones having their wealth garnished.

Truly a case of socialism for thee, but Laissez-faire for me mindset.

They demand the redistribution of financial capital because they perceive themselves as disadvantaged in that regard, but they guard their sexual capital with a ruthless, elitist gatekeeping. The irony is that a truly "leftist" worldview would recognize that sexual isolation is a form of poverty. But because the poor in this scenario are men they find repulsive, they abandon their principles of need-based distribution and revert to the most hardcore, Darwinian survival of the fittest mentality. They are only "collectivists" when it’s someone else’s money on the line; when it’s their own "preferences," they are the most radical libertarians on the planet. The ironic part is that the sexual market is arguably even more intrinsically biased than the economic market, and additionally, it is considerably less regulated than it.

 

[SmhChan]

The great irony of this is that the average foid these days leans to the left, that absolutely abhor the idea of a person making their own wealth and choosing to keep it for themselves instead of giving it back to the community, Whether or not the more wealthy people actually worked hard to earn their wealth and whether or not the people who are receiving this wealth truly deserve it doesn't matter to them as they are often fueled by jealousy of what they themselves don't have but when they are the ones who have thinks that others don't have they wish to keep it, Which isn't surprising because a significant amount of socialists are socialists until they are the ones having their wealth garnished.

Foids lean towards whatever serves their purpose. Their political allegiance is nothing to study about.

 

[Maikowski]

Capitalism gave women more power to be independent then ever before in history. It gave women fake daycare jobs. It gave women the internet, instagram, TikTok, and Hinge. Literally enabled women to be hypergamous.