God is real

[Decal1us_____]

Jorge Luis Borges on mysticism(chapter: do you believe in god? Interview with Borges):

Do you believe in God?

If by God we imply a single personality or a trinity, some sort of supernatural man, a judge of our actions and thoughts, I don't believe in that being. On the other hand, if by God we mean a moral or mental purpose in the universe, I certainly believe in Him. Regarding the problem of personal immortal-ity, which Unamuno and other writers have connected to the notion of God, I don't believe in it, nor do I desire to be personally immortal.


That there is an order in the universe, a system of periodic recurrences and a general evolution, seems to me obvious. No less undeniable to me is the existence of a moral law, of an intimate feeling of having acted well or badly in each occasion.

Do you mean, essentially, that all this would prove the existence of God, or that he has been the creator, the beginning and end of everything?

I don't know if God is in the beginning of the cosmic process, but possibly he's at the end. God is perhaps an aspiration toward which the universe is predisposed.

And why do you believe in God in this way?

I believe intuitively and, besides, it would be despairing not to believe. If we presume there is a perfect and omnipotent being at the beginning of universal history, and we presume also that he created the world, then we cannot understand why pain and evil exist. If we assume, on the other hand, a God who is in the process of creation as the cosmos or our individual destiny evolves, in that particular form we can believe in Him, that is, as an evolving passage toward perfectibility.

And how do you apply your belief to the practices of everyday life?

I try to apply it. Within the constraints of the life to which I am conditioned, I do the best I can. Besides, I do not demand of my ambition's limits more than what the natural process of my own evolution can give me. I try to be a good man, but I don't always succeed.
___________________________________

What are y’alls thoughts?

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

The only real god is...

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

The only real god is...
View attachment 1321992

Feed her 10 hot dogs and French fries.

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

Feed her 10 hot dogs and French fries.

NUUUUUUUU

Blast her with tren and anavar

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

NUUUUUUUU

Yes. And the next day she should eat an entire pizza in one sitting followed by a soda

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

Yes. And the next day she should eat an entire pizza in one sitting followed by a soda

She can only have one slice and I eat the entire pizza

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

She can only have one slice and I eat the entire pizza

No, I’ll feed her all the pizzas

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

No, I’ll feed her all the pizzas

I will give her tren to ensure it turns to muscle

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

I will give her tren to ensure it turns to muscle

Dnr nigga

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

I will give her tren to ensure it turns to muscle

It’s gotta turn to soft fat to be sexy.

 

[Old Ironsides]

Blasphemous tbh.
Real God is divine.
The Holy Trinity should be followed here.

 

[The_word_made_flesh]

Jesus is Lord and King forever and ever !!

 

[Mecoja]

Jesus is Lord and King forever and ever !!

Amen.

 

[Mecoja]

Too much intangible spiritism leads to worshipping demons.

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

Presupposing that there is an objective morality said description of God is correct. That being said "objective morality" is a presupposition and has not been proven as of yet, therefore this is a relational argument at best. So if you are agnostic or not religious and believe in objective morality you might define god as such.

That being said there isn't any sufficient proof (other that one money pointing at the sun and saying "he told me that you need to give me your shit") for objective morality therefore no, I do not think that this is proof of God. Objective morality per definition needs a prime mover, some metaphysical source, so your whole argument is just circular reasoning.

 

[The_word_made_flesh]

Amen.

Good to hear my friend

 

[Balikesir]

Too much intangible spiritism leads to worshipping demons.

A phenomenon we can witness today. Numerology, channeling, idol worship. It is commonly done these days. People have no religion. No god. They have turned to demons. They encourage the youth to repeat their mistakes in order for them to not be alone in their falsehoods.

 

[Mecoja]

A phenomenon we can witness today. Numerology, channeling, idol worship. It is commonly done these days. People have no religion. No god. They have turned to demons. They encourage the youth to repeat their mistakes in order for them to not be alone in their falsehoods.

And all the self love inner spirituality is satanism, calling themselves gods and kings.

 

[Balikesir]

And all the self love inner spirituality is satanism, calling themselves gods and kings.

Their basis for this new age cult is Indian paganism. They took the basis and combined it with western religions. This is where you get the people who make videos on summoning spirits or channeling dead children. This is funded by the elite. The elite themself published a book about it. 'The secret' is the name.

The Secret (Byrne book) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Its about how manifestation works. An idea based on fantasies. They have appropriated quotes from scientists too. Albert Einsteins

Is the most notorious quote.

He never said this. There is no proof to suggest he ever said this. The elite has convinced the average person in believing in fantasies. They laugh at us behind the curtain.

 

[Mecoja]

Their basis for this new age cult is Indian paganism. They took the basis and combined it with western religions. This is where you get the people who make videos on summoning spirits or channeling dead children. This is funded by the elite. The elite themself published a book about it. 'The secret' is the name.

The Secret (Byrne book) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Its about how manifestation works. An idea based on fantasies. They have appropriated quotes from scientists too. Albert Einsteins

View attachment 1323177

Is the most notorious quote.

He never said this. There is no proof to suggest he ever said this. The elite has convinced the average person in believing in fantasies. They laugh at us behind the curtain.

Very interesting and true.

 

[B33troot]

Blasphemous tbh.
Real God is divine.
The Holy Trinity should be followed here.
View attachment 1322024

God is not a Trinity. The bible doesn't even teach that idea.

 

[Old Ironsides]

God is not a Trinity. The bible doesn't even teach that idea.

You are correct. The Bible does not mention the Holy Trinity.
God is divine, however the church argues who God is.

 

[Decal1us_____]

Jesus is Lord and King forever and ever !!

I agree

 

[Decal1us_____]

Too much intangible spiritism leads to worshipping demons.

I dont follow spiritism

 

[Mecoja]

I dont follow spiritism

Thats good.

 

[Decal1us_____]

Their basis for this new age cult is Indian paganism. They took the basis and combined it with western religions. This is where you get the people who make videos on summoning spirits or channeling dead children. This is funded by the elite. The elite themself published a book about it. 'The secret' is the name.

The Secret (Byrne book) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Its about how manifestation works. An idea based on fantasies. They have appropriated quotes from scientists too. Albert Einsteins

View attachment 1323177

Is the most notorious quote.

He never said this. There is no proof to suggest he ever said this. The elite has convinced the average person in believing in fantasies. They laugh at us behind the curtain.

Aka new age movement beliefs. Who is behind the new age movement? Jesuits. Jesuits are also behind the illuminati, C.F.R., international bankers, the mafia(criminal arm of the vatican), club of rome, the opus dei, and more…

 

[Decal1us_____]

Thats good.

 

[Decal1us_____]

Presupposing that there is an objective morality said description of God is correct. That being said "objective morality" is a presupposition and has not been proven as of yet, therefore this is a relational argument at best. So if you are agnostic or not religious and believe in objective morality you might define god as such.

That being said there isn't any sufficient proof (other that one money pointing at the sun and saying "he told me that you need to give me your shit") for objective morality therefore no, I do not think that this is proof of God. Objective morality per definition needs a prime mover, some metaphysical source, so your whole argument is just circular reasoning.

Ok

 

[AegisReflector]

Presupposing that there is an objective morality said description of God is correct. That being said "objective morality" is a presupposition and has not been proven as of yet, therefore this is a relational argument at best. So if you are agnostic or not religious and believe in objective morality you might define god as such.

That being said there isn't any sufficient proof (other that one money pointing at the sun and saying "he told me that you need to give me your shit") for objective morality therefore no, I do not think that this is proof of God. Objective morality per definition needs a prime mover, some metaphysical source, so your whole argument is just circular reasoning.

He mentioned "the intimate feeling of having acted well or bad in each occasion". Is that not proof of at least some sense of an objective morality?

I personally think there's a chance it could exist in that form, but it's difficult to tell with so little information. From an universal standpoint, morality doesn't make much sense outside the human reality. Most living beings must kill to remain alive. The system(universe) basically tells us: i demand you to make others suffer for your own good, yet we all know killing is "bad".

My personal opinion: there is some sort of "morality" check in this system that we live in, but it has very little in common with what we call morality. It checks any sort of action, including thoughts(and those might be even more important than the actions themselves), and measures them to it's own standards of what constitutes high level and low level energy, and grants us a reflection of that. If you insist on low level energy, it will punish you with low level results to force you to climb the evolutionary ladder. An all encompassing evolutionary check.

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

feeling

Well because morality is dependent on his personal feelings that makes it per definition subjective. If he were to simply not live then his whole moral system would disappear because it is contingent upon his perspective and analysis.

From an universal standpoint, morality doesn't make much sense outside the human reality

That is why objective morality is not a thing. At the very least morality is contingent upon humanity, religious people like to cope with that by saying that God is infallible and therefore his morality must be objective, which is obviously wrong.

yet we all know killing is "bad"

I disagree with that, a lot of people also do. fact of the matter is that nothing is good or bad, that is the default position (moral antirealism), if you disagree you need to come up with some proof.

 

[Poopless One]

Dnrd. Agree with the title tho.

 

[Decal1us_____]

Dnrd. Agree with the title tho.

 

[biggestloser]

NUUUUUUUU

Blast her with tren and anavar

give her human growth hormone

 

[Chingaquedito]

Jorge Luis Borges on mysticism(chapter: do you believe in god? Interview with Borges):

Do you believe in God?

If by God we imply a single personality or a trinity, some sort of supernatural man, a judge of our actions and thoughts, I don't believe in that being. On the other hand, if by God we mean a moral or mental purpose in the universe, I certainly believe in Him. Regarding the problem of personal immortal-ity, which Unamuno and other writers have connected to the notion of God, I don't believe in it, nor do I desire to be personally immortal.


That there is an order in the universe, a system of periodic recurrences and a general evolution, seems to me obvious. No less undeniable to me is the existence of a moral law, of an intimate feeling of having acted well or badly in each occasion.

Do you mean, essentially, that all this would prove the existence of God, or that he has been the creator, the beginning and end of everything?

I don't know if God is in the beginning of the cosmic process, but possibly he's at the end. God is perhaps an aspiration toward which the universe is predisposed.

And why do you believe in God in this way?

I believe intuitively and, besides, it would be despairing not to believe. If we presume there is a perfect and omnipotent being at the beginning of universal history, and we presume also that he created the world, then we cannot understand why pain and evil exist. If we assume, on the other hand, a God who is in the process of creation as the cosmos or our individual destiny evolves, in that particular form we can believe in Him, that is, as an evolving passage toward perfectibility.

And how do you apply your belief to the practices of everyday life?

I try to apply it. Within the constraints of the life to which I am conditioned, I do the best I can. Besides, I do not demand of my ambition's limits more than what the natural process of my own evolution can give me. I try to be a good man, but I don't always succeed.
___________________________________

What are y’alls thoughts?

this guy was too logical to write fiction or believe in supernatural shit, even in his fantasy stories he leaves clues that make his fiction more “realistic” (Just like lovecraft did in the "dream cycle")

I find it hard to think that he really believed in god, or supernatural stuff for which there is no empirical evidence, he probably said all that crap to sound more enigmatic and to stimulate the imagination of his readers

 

[Decal1us_____]

this guy was too logical to write fiction or believe in supernatural shit, even in his fantasy stories he leaves clues that make his fiction more “realistic” (Just like lovecraft did in the "dream cycle")

I find it hard to think that he really believed in god, or supernatural stuff for which there is no empirical evidence, he probably said all that crap to sound more enigmatic and to stimulate the imagination of his readers

What religion do you think he followed?

 

[RandomGuy]

The first god named in the Bible is Shaddai.

The fake one.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ByGTYOyATxE?si=JkrXEx9oO6A_8ogv

The real one.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/jzGKnf6h2TU?si=d6Ibrv43JIBe2qMW

 

[DeliriousMerchant]

The only real god is...
View attachment 1321992

Damn, she looks bad as hell here
Too bad art's inconsistent

 

[decafincel]

The only real god is...
View attachment 1321992

She would be with some Brazilian soccer player if she was real

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

She would be with some Brazilian soccer player if she was real

She would be my wife
As for Hinata would be @Left4DeadNiggerboy's wife

 

[John"]

god is a cope like meat beating (ofc the latter is much more beta).

 

[decafincel]

She would be my wife
As for Hinata would be @Left4DeadNiggerboy's wife

I've never watched Goon Hero but I don't get the appeal, there's wayyy hotter anime foids. As long as you're happy tho

 

[Based NaziCel]

The only real god is...
View attachment 1321992

This is literally foid worshipping, nugga

 

[Decal1us_____]

god is a cope like meat beating (ofc the latter is much more beta).

god is the demiurge

 

[Ahnfeltia]

if by God we mean a moral or mental purpose in the universe, I certainly believe in Him

I've personally never believed in a God-given purpose.

Presupposing that there is an objective morality said description of God is correct. That being said "objective morality" is a presupposition and has not been proven as of yet, therefore this is a relational argument at best. So if you are agnostic or not religious and believe in objective morality you might define god as such.

That being said there isn't any sufficient proof (other that one money pointing at the sun and saying "he told me that you need to give me your shit") for objective morality therefore no, I do not think that this is proof of God. Objective morality per definition needs a prime mover, some metaphysical source, so your whole argument is just circular reasoning.

Objective morality can never be (dis)proven because it's entirely superphysical.

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

superphysical

Prove the existence of that, I assume that this is a niche way of saying metaphysics.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

I assume that this is a niche way of saying metaphysics.

pretty much. Its exact definition is

being above or beyond the physical world or explanation on physical principles

Prove the existence of that

I'm claiming objective morality -- were it to exist -- would be part of the superphysical. My point is that superphysical things cannot be (dis)proven because they're beyond all means of proof we have (unless you allow superphysical axioms).

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

I'm claiming objective morality -- were it to exist -- would be part of the superphysical. My point is that superphysical things cannot be (dis)proven because they're beyond all means of proof we have (unless you allow superphysical axioms).

Long story short like most theistic people you strongly suspect something for which there is no proof for. In western logic we have something called Occam's Razor, ergo a theory that necessitates more preconceptions than the other is false, because the chances of more preconceptions actually being true is smaller than that of a theory with less preconceptions.

Because non existence of the metaphysical has one preconception tied to it it is more likely to be true than metaphysics being real. You can just read any of Kant's works are realize what a large volume of preconceptions is needed to make his world view work. I'm not implying that you necessarily agree with Kant I am just giving an example of the mental gymnastics that are tied to such theories.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

like most theistic people you strongly suspect something for which there is no proof

I don't think so. What do you think I'm suspecting then?

 

[Malsori]

The only real god is...
View attachment 1321992

Transvestite

 

[Malsori]

Long story short like most theistic people you strongly suspect something for which there is no proof for. In western logic we have something called Occam's Razor, ergo a theory that necessitates more preconceptions than the other is false, because the chances of more preconceptions actually being true is smaller than that of a theory with less preconceptions.

Because non existence of the metaphysical has one preconception tied to it it is more likely to be true than metaphysics being real. You can just read any of Kant's works are realize what a large volume of preconceptions is needed to make his world view work. I'm not implying that you necessarily agree with Kant I am just giving an example of the mental gymnastics that are tied to such theories.

Long story short i'm not reading your soy trash and instead will tell you to go fuck yourself you nigger. God is real and is fighting lefty fags like you