I've been thinking a lot and came up with this law:
"In any mammal species, there shall always be males that never experience sex with a female mate out of desirability: due to unfavourable genetics."
This applies to all mammals - including humans.
Name one group of mammals that doesn't have a hierarchy in which the superior genetic male breeds/has sex meanwhile all the undesirable/less genetically fortunate males don't ever experience that.
I remember watching a NatGeo documentary as a kid about some seals: there was one alpha male seal that had a pod of female seals at his disposal. All he did was eat and breed.
I'll never forget this moment: 4 other male seals were watching in the distance. One of them got the attention of one of the female seals and try to get close to her to mate with her, the genetically superior male seal saw this and almost killed him.
The point I'm trying to make is we're no different to all the other mammals. Granted foids aren't looking for someone who'll kill other males as there's no need for physical combat or to defend territory as even
@needsolution could take down a 6'9 Ogrecel with a .45cp gun (which he legally purchased).
Therefore the only way foids can genetically select males is by your looks and height. That's the only factor which is determined by your genetics and has little influence with external factors.
As times progress foids will want guys with better faces and to be much taller.
Why?
Just look at the makeup industry.
As of 9 July 2019: the beauty industry is valued at $532 billion.
A small percentage of those users will be males. It's indisputable that foids have driven that rapid growth as they want methods to enhance their own genetics to get the best men they can possibly find - hence why they go for plastic surgey to attain: larger firmer breasts, larger asses, fuller lips etc.
They're not "doing it for themselves", well actually, they kind of are: with chad as the underlying motive. They want to get the best male mate possible.
In addition, the average height has increased, granted that could be attributed to better nutrition and lack of war/fighting but, I'd also say the genetic selection by foids is also a contributing factor - this would have to be investigated further.
Incels are a thing across all mammals, but the percentage of incels in men is much larger than that in women firstly and it's growing at a much greater rate in men than women making "femcels" (which don't exist) negligible.
That Inceldom issue needs to be addressed.
I'm not denying that Incels shouldn't exist, but if we're approaching a stage where 30% of men will never have sex and based on the graph: is showing no signs of decreasing. We have a problem.
a c c e l e r a t e