![chainmail](/data/avatars/m/65/65714.jpg?1720816924)
chainmail
Recruit
★★★
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
- Posts
- 256
Its both they are correlatedAryan and Dravidian are linguistic terms btw not racial
Its both they are correlatedAryan and Dravidian are linguistic terms btw not racial
In what way you mean?Its both they are correlated
Hierarchy isEven though I am engaging in this conversation, I don’t get why MENA and south asians on here argue about attractiveness. It’s pretty obvious that the further northwest you go, the more attractive people are going to be (in MENA and South Asia). And saying that your people are attractive won’t change the fact that are you a subhuman who posts on .is.
I would say for men it’s:Hierarchy is
White>black>Latino>Asian>middle east>indian
It's not coming from my mouthI would say for men it’s:
White>black>middle east>latino>asian>indian
Middle easterners get a bad rep because of terrorism. They still mog Latino and Asian men.It's not coming from my mouth
View attachment 1204910
Minus the Pashtuns.Pakistanis are curries.