...that this glorious mask-off moment for feminists happened almost two-and-a-half years ago:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kgfyjy/sheer_hypocrisy_a_law_designed_for_equality_is/
www.cbsnews.com
www.theguardian.com
Jfl at any poor fuckers that still believe the bullshit of feminism being about anything else than pure female supremacy
, least of all any type of "equality." Here it is, a glorious mask-off, no gaslighting, no bullshit, moment of what feminism actually is, straight from one of the most powerful women in Europe.
THERE IT IS. A clear as day admission that "feminism" = "female dominance", coming straight from the mouth of the person who is almost certainly the single most powerful mayoral/regional-level politician in the European Union, if not the entirety of Europe as a whole even. Just fucking look at what she said lmao. The more women there are, the more feminist it is. If feminism was about """equality""" as all the bluepillers endlessly repeat whenever the topic of men's rights is addressed ("We don't need men's rights movements, they are just misogynistic, feminism is already fighting for equality for all.") then something being "too feminist" would be said institution forcing a 50/50 gender split at all its positions, to the point of it being detrimental. But no, for her, something being feminist means pure female dominance, and she, once again, one of the most powerful politicians in Europe, frankly admits it with none of the bullshit gaslighting we face from feminists and their simp allies on the net.
Just, fucking, lol at this entire article.
.
Just fucking lol, just fucking lol, JUST FUCKING LOL.
We're way past the point where "reversing the races/genders" was even worth the effort. For fuckers like this, pointing out double standards means absolutely nothing. They want their group to achieve power and they will do absolutely anything for it. No amount of pointing out their monumental hypocrisy in crying victim to get prefferential treatment, only to keep said prefferential treatment even after becoming the dominant, "oppressive" majority will ever amount to anything. At most, they will just laugh and rub it in your face.
That said, I still can't help myself in saying, just fucking imagine if something like this happened with genders/races switched around.
Just imagine the sheer fucking explosion ofrage all over the internet if some white guy, working in either a slightly female-dominated field or a minority-dominated one, started hiring only white men, and when fined for that, would say that he'd come to pay the fine with all of the white guys working for him to make a statement, say that the fine is, "obviously absurd, unfair, irresponsible and dangerous," and say that white guys need to be promoted as much as possible to lower the inequalities.
And of course, the house always wins:
The fine was only for 2018, because in 2019, most likely expecting something like this to happen, the French repealed it. Of course, the fine will only go towards making sure that more of this is happening.
Also, "absurd." They, the feminists writing about this, fucking called it "absurd" as well hahahahahahahahahahaha. The sheer "mask-off-ness" of this shit hahahahahahahahahaha.
Which is fucking hilarious when you compare this law ("one sex should not account for more than 60% of nominations to management positions"), with the recent EU ruling that "listed companies that have a registered office in an EU country would be required to aim to have 40 percent of their non-executive director positions held by women by 2027."
www.politico.eu
NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE FUCKING FEMINIST BITCHES CALLING OUT THE FRENCH EX-LAW IS SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT THE RECENT EU LAW. THEY ARE BASICALLY THE FUCKING SAME, BOTH REQUIRING MEN TO BE AT MOST 60% OF THOSE POWERFUL POSITIONS. However, the French law was written in a gender neutral way, which meant that it backfired on women, which is why those powerful politicians are all mocking it, why it was repealed just a year after being created, and why those powerful politicians are making a comedy show of paying the fine.
ON THE OTHER HAND, the EU law is NOT gender neutral, it is specifically created and written in a way that makes it clear that it is supposed to benefit women and thus has no chance of backfiring on women. THAT is why no feminists are calling it absurd or calling for it to be repealed, even though it makes it perfectly legal for companies to be 100% female controlled, but any company with too much men must publish plans to get more women in its leadership.
And then thefeminists and IT cucks tell us that feminists want "equality". LOL.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kgfyjy/sheer_hypocrisy_a_law_designed_for_equality_is/
Paris city hall fined for hiring too many women under law aimed at fixing gender balance
Mayor Anne Hidalgo mocked the $109,408 fine as "obviously absurd, unfair, irresponsible and dangerous."
www.cbsnews.com
Paris city hall fined for putting too many women in senior roles
Paris mayor to pay fine of €90,000 for breaking national rules in 2018 on gender parity
Jfl at any poor fuckers that still believe the bullshit of feminism being about anything else than pure female supremacy
, least of all any type of "equality." Here it is, a glorious mask-off, no gaslighting, no bullshit, moment of what feminism actually is, straight from one of the most powerful women in Europe.THERE IT IS. A clear as day admission that "feminism" = "female dominance", coming straight from the mouth of the person who is almost certainly the single most powerful mayoral/regional-level politician in the European Union, if not the entirety of Europe as a whole even. Just fucking look at what she said lmao
. The more women there are, the more feminist it is. If feminism was about """equality""" as all the bluepillers endlessly repeat whenever the topic of men's rights is addressed ("We don't need men's rights movements, they are just misogynistic, feminism is already fighting for equality for all.") then something being "too feminist" would be said institution forcing a 50/50 gender split at all its positions, to the point of it being detrimental. But no, for her, something being feminist means pure female dominance, and she, once again, one of the most powerful politicians in Europe, frankly admits it with none of the bullshit gaslighting we face from feminists and their simp allies on the net.Just, fucking, lol at this entire article.
Motherfucker
.Just fucking lol, just fucking lol, JUST FUCKING LOL
.We're way past the point where "reversing the races/genders" was even worth the effort. For fuckers like this, pointing out double standards means absolutely nothing. They want their group to achieve power and they will do absolutely anything for it. No amount of pointing out their monumental hypocrisy in crying victim to get prefferential treatment, only to keep said prefferential treatment even after becoming the dominant, "oppressive" majority will ever amount to anything. At most, they will just laugh and rub it in your face.
That said, I still can't help myself in saying, just fucking imagine if something like this happened with genders/races switched around.
Just imagine the sheer fucking explosion of
rage all over the internet if some white guy, working in either a slightly female-dominated field or a minority-dominated one, started hiring only white men, and when fined for that, would say that he'd come to pay the fine with all of the white guys working for him to make a statement, say that the fine is, "obviously absurd, unfair, irresponsible and dangerous," and say that white guys need to be promoted as much as possible to lower the inequalities.And of course, the house always wins:
The fine was only for 2018, because in 2019, most likely expecting something like this to happen, the French repealed it. Of course, the fine will only go towards making sure that more of this is happening.
Also, "absurd." They, the feminists writing about this, fucking called it "absurd" as well hahahahahahahahahahaha
. The sheer "mask-off-ness" of this shit hahahahahahahahahaha.Which is fucking hilarious when you compare this law ("one sex should not account for more than 60% of nominations to management positions"), with the recent EU ruling that "listed companies that have a registered office in an EU country would be required to aim to have 40 percent of their non-executive director positions held by women by 2027."
Council advances EU plan to put more women on corporate boards
Von der Leyen hails new rules to break ‘glass ceiling’ in corporate boardrooms.
NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE FUCKING FEMINIST BITCHES CALLING OUT THE FRENCH EX-LAW IS SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT THE RECENT EU LAW. THEY ARE BASICALLY THE FUCKING SAME, BOTH REQUIRING MEN TO BE AT MOST 60% OF THOSE POWERFUL POSITIONS. However, the French law was written in a gender neutral way, which meant that it backfired on women, which is why those powerful politicians are all mocking it, why it was repealed just a year after being created, and why those powerful politicians are making a comedy show of paying the fine.
ON THE OTHER HAND, the EU law is NOT gender neutral, it is specifically created and written in a way that makes it clear that it is supposed to benefit women and thus has no chance of backfiring on women. THAT is why no feminists are calling it absurd or calling for it to be repealed, even though it makes it perfectly legal for companies to be 100% female controlled, but any company with too much men must publish plans to get more women in its leadership.
And then the
feminists and IT cucks tell us that feminists want "equality". LOL.
