when you have a population of men, where something like war is the only outlet for redirected sexual frustration, a little background is needed. In the ancient times, war was fought mainly for, aside from economic reasons, the ability to conquer another group of people, this meant women of the conquered tribe were seen as "booty" for the victorious side in any given conflict. In turn, it would provide respite after an engagement was made and resolved. Nowadays, with the military engaged in diversifying campaigns, this outlet is starting to "not exist" for many men. Now you might say, well things like "school shootings" existed before these campaigns. Well even so, its because modern men have no outlet in a "civilized society" to redirect these energies into something productive for hundreds of years at this point, and with the bottlenecking of the institution of the military to exclude biological men from serving combat, A socially acceptable outlet for aggression no longer exists so it ends up being redirected elsewhere, often at the expense of other people, not only that but with the standards of women in the west getting more and more unreasonable, the levels of violent activity will only rise, Which is bad news for any standing republic. Because if men have nothing to lose, this will culminate in the eventual overthrow of any order that does not cater to their specific needs as individuals in a congruent society. It might happen tomorrow, it might not happen for several decades. However, the point still stands that any country that interferes with the rights of its citizens, even if some people might point out that something like “sexual intercourse” is not a need, if you get down to brass tacks and the source of the issue, it might spell life or death for any country that wants to survive the hem and haw of not only day to day business of dealing with other nations, or keeping its infrastructure tight, or making sure all citizens are safe and their liberties are protected against those who might interfere with those rights, be it corporations, governments, or society in general, its best to make sure your population is satisfied (general speaking) in their life’s lot, unless your goal is bring about ruin to your people and deal with endless violence that is either directed between individuals or at your state. An aside, one might ask “well what if the women are unhappy?” well you see women tend to internalize their struggles, so anything that is committed against them they will just blame on themselves. Not to say that they deserve to be unhappy, but overall their happiness is secondary to the overall constitution of a state or nation.
