Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Gene editing would reduce lookism

Lv99_BixNood

Lv99_BixNood

fascel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
24,036
Online time
2d 17h
The reason good looks are valuable is that they're rare, only a tiny fraction of the population has the right genes. But with affordable gene editing everyone could make their children chads and stacies, it's not rare anymore. Roasties would have to find a different status symbol to obsess about.
 
Standards would just increase. And for those who aren’t aware of gene editing or can’t afford it will suffer even more with increased standards.
 
The recombination pill still applies though. Just choosing the genes its born with isn’t enough to guarantee equality of looks or SMV
 
Standards would just increase. And for those who aren’t aware of gene editing or can’t afford it will suffer even more with increased standards.
But there's natural limits like for height, over a certain height you get serious health problems. People would make their children the maximum height possible without significantly affecting their health.
 
But there's natural limits like for height, over a certain height you get serious health problems. People would make their children the maximum height possible without significantly affecting their health.
No, I mean incels will still exist regardless (and will suffer even more) because gene editing isn’t accessible to everyone and will make being 6 feet the average height minimum.
 
The requirement to be NT would gain more prominence, as many serious psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia or serious bipolar and OCD cases basically make you radioactive to women.
 
Shit like coloring (for whites) and height would become worthless but no one will ever be able to get ratios on point like nature does on occasion, not only do we not have set ratios yet but you can never guarantee the millimeters in the face
 
The reason good looks are valuable is that they're rare, only a tiny fraction of the population has the right genes. But with affordable gene editing everyone could make their children chads and stacies, it's not rare anymore. Roasties would have to find a different status symbol to obsess about.
The standards would just rise
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top