fwhr and its relation to SMV

[truecel23]

What is the ideal would you say?

 

[Zielony4]

Isn't is supposed to be some sort of 1.618 golden ratio? Not sure of much lol.

 

[truecel23]

Isn't is supposed to be some sort of 1.618 golden ratio? Not sure of much lol.

Not sure. Lots of conflicting opinions on lookism etc.

 

[CopingGymcel]

Mine is almost 2 and my SMV is low.

 

[truecel23]

Mine is almost 2 and my SMV is low.

Yeah I think overall features matter a lot. Even having an overly wide jaw can destroy SMV.

 

[CopingGymcel]

Yeah I think overall features matter a lot. Even having an overly wide jaw can destroy SMV.

This is how I look at it: 

As long as your fWHR isn't too low or too high, you'll be fine. If it's 1.75 or 1.9, it doesn't matter much.

 

[truecel23]

This is how I look at it: 

As long as your fWHR isn't too low or too high, you'll be fine. If it's 1.75 or 1.9, it doesn't matter much.

What's up with the 1.618 golden ratio thing?

 

[CopingGymcel]

What's up with the 1.618 golden ratio thing?

Isn't that for the shoulder width to hip ratio? Doubt it applies to face, 1.6 fWHR is a bit narrow.

 

[truecel23]

Isn't that for the shoulder width to hip ratio? Doubt it applies to face, 1.6 fWHR is a bit narrow.

Nah it refers to face apparently.

 

[CopingGymcel]

Nah it refers to face apparently.

That's quite a low fWHR.